The 14 Words

Sunday, 3 August 2014

Europeans crying for our enemies. What is wrong with us? - Rufus


As I write these words, terrible suffering is underway; human beings are being slaughtered in massive numbers; lives are being destroyed. The tragedy I speak of is the massacre of Europeans in the Ukraine. This horrific crime against ordinary people has gained attention from time-to-time, but it has not become the focus of mass protests, with Europe-wide calls for 'something to be done' to stop the destruction of our European kin. Why not? Because Europeans being murdered in Europe for the benefit of global finance, simply isn't considered important to the liberal bigots - unless of course the suffering can be manipulated to justify killing even more of our people!

Contrast the lack of interest in the destruction of the Ukraine, with the hysteria from the liberal self-haters when it comes to moaning about ongoing bloodshed in Asia. The butchery of Syria and Iraq were deliberately created in order to destroy strong nations, thus allowing for their exploitation and the enrichment of multi-national corporations. 

The barbarism unleashed by the destabilisation of the region has destroyed many thousands of lives - and with the emergence of ISIL/ISIS, this descent into primitive brutality can only be expected to grow. The liberal bigots seem quite happy to go along with those who created this horror, by calling for the end of legitimate rule in Syria, and by repeating the official mantra that however bad things are in Iraq, it is better than had Saddam Hussain remained. The ability of liberals to cry for one set of civilians over another, whilst simultaneously believing they are opposing despotism by supporting it in a different form, is truly astounding.


In Africa there is a great deal of bloodshed, but no-one even acknowledges it. The liberal rent-a-mob 'Stop the War Coalition' (a front for the MI5 operation, the SWP) don't bother with the outrages in Africa unless they can blame Europeans for them, so when it is Africans killing Africans (and especially when global finance gains from the carnage), the blood spilled doesn't matter to the hypocrites of the STWC/SWP.

One particular conflict which has really got the liberal idiots excited, is the current Israeli actions in the Gaza strip. Interestingly, the 'far-right' and 'far-left' both have taken up the cause of the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians, although they support the Arabs for very different reasons.


To the Left (which in the UK includes those who use the term liberal), the refusal of Israel to allow itself to become a mongrelised multi-culti sewer, is reason enough to hate that nation. The one-worlders are so debased and so obsessed with destroying their own people that they cannot tolerate any people defending itself. It is perhaps one of the greatest ironies of the degenerate multi-culti European nightmare, that our present plight was engineered by diaspora Jews, who have been so successful in wrecking our lands, that attention has now turned to theirs. By 'theirs' I naturally mean theirs by occupation in much the same way as 'theft by finding' or 'squatters rights', but be that as it may, the simple act of defending the land one occupies, rather than opening one's borders to invasion, is enough to raise the ire of the liberal multi-cultists and their associated globalizers.


To the Right, the support for Gaza comes as a knee-jerk reaction to the fact that it is Israel which is fighting there. The hatred of Israel comes from a deep understanding of the Judaic nature of those who have brought about our downfall. It is very much understandable that people who have been so very seriously harmed by Organised Jewry and the lies of the Holyhoax, should take pleasure from the problems facing Israel. At an emotional level, the need for revenge for the evils of multi-culturalism, mass non-European Immigration, Capitalism, Globalism etc etc etc, are wholly supportable. However, as the hostility to the concept of the Jewish State is borne of emotion, it tends to cloud the judgement of those who seek the best for their own people. It is right to oppose the machinations of the Jews in the diaspora and those in Israel who pull their strings, but to allow oneself to be ruled by emotion is a mistake. The power of the diaspora must end, but that will be much harder if the Jewish State comes to an end and the diaspora becomes the norm.

The Third Position on Gaza is also in favour of the Palestinians. This is not due to hatred of Jews or to a love of multi-culturalism, but rather due to a sense of fairness. If we are to call for an end of the occupation of our lands by foreigners who have no business here, then we must defend the Palestinians who have had their lands stolen by the people who call themselves Israelis. This position is reasonable and logical. How can anyone argue for his own freedom, yet deny the freedom of another? 

The Third Position on 'Palestine' has the unfortunate impact of weakening the Jewish State and thereby increasing the chance of the State failing. The argument is based upon the premise that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, and that the sacred bond of Blood and Soil must be protected. Herein lies the whole crux of the Palestine-Israel problem.

In ancient times, the land upon which Israel rests was considered the Holy Land. Jews, Moslems and Christians still see the territory as sacred. Taking the side of the Palestinians is to support their assertion that the land belongs to Islam. Taking the side of Israel is to support their assertion that the land belongs to Judaism. There is an alternative view, which is that the land belongs to the true Israelites, who are not the modern Jews, but rather are the Anglo Saxons of Northwest Europe. The Israelite claim is also taken up by Ethiopians who claim that Blacks are the real Israelites and the Khazar/Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews are imposters. Every point is problematic, and can be argued point-by-point by those who have religious axes to grind.


If we consider the Palestine-Israel issue according to the unity of Blood and Soil, then the claims to the territory are thus:
  • Palestine is an Arab land and the Jews stole it in 1948 by means of mass immigration and colonisation, much as the Pakistanis are doing in England.
  • Israel is the home of the Jewish people who are its rightful owners due to being there 2000 years ago.
So which story is true?

Palestine is the name used to designate the Arabs living in the disputed land. This is a modern usage of the name, which is highly political. Until the creation of Israel, Palestine was a term often used to refer to the Jews living in the region. Under the British Mandate, the west of the Transjordan region was known as Palestine. Prior to this Palestine was used to denote the land south of Syria in the Middle East. Clearly the name is not without problems.

Palestine in its earliest use referred to the land inhabited by the Philistines.  The racially-observant Biblical texts have accustomed us to viewing the Philistines as uncultured peoples. However, this isn't so.  The Philistines were uncircumcised people from the Greek islands - they were Europeans who were slandered in religious texts because they were not Jewish in race or religion - being rather, Europeans who worshiped the fish god, Dagon.  The name Philistine became mutated into Palestine over time (as is to be expected).  The original Palestinians were Greeks, not Arabs, not Semites, not Jews.

The term Israel is used to refer to the ancient Kingdom of the same name, to a people who claim to have been granted the land by their deity.  Obviously this is impossible to verify or refute and is a matter of religious faith.  Interestingly, the 'Children of Israel' is not a straight forward definition.  The muddling of the terms Jews and Israel has caused this confusion.

The Israelites and the Jews were not one and the same.  If the name chosen for the Jewish State had been Judea, then there would be no need to debate the issue - the land of Judea (now in the disputed West Bank) can be confirmed as Jewish for thousands of years, and the larger cities in the Gaza Strip were heavily-populated by Jews until recent times when they were taken over by mass Arab immigration.  The name Israel, however, gives legitimacy to a claim that the land belongs to those who rejected Judaism and held on to the Israelite religion, which became Christianity.  It is amusing to note that if Israel should be the exclusive land of the Israelites, then that would mean that there is no place there for the Moslem migrants or for the Jews who rejected the Second Covenant of Israel.

Logically then, as Palestine was the land of European Philistines, and as the name Israel relates to a people who migrated to the west, leaving the anti-Israelite Jews behind, the whole of modern Israel can be claimed spiritually and racially by Europeans!  Should we then argue that all the Jews AND the Moslems get out of that territory and 'return' it to Europe?  It is a logical argument, but an academic one not worthy of seriously pursuing.


It can be seen that the Jewish claims to Israel can be demolished just as easily as the Arab ones, but equally can be supported by those who are partisan.  This leaves a further question: Does it serve the interests of Europeans better if there is a strong Jewish State and no Palestine, if there is a weak Jewish State and a limited Palestine, or if there is no Jewish State and a unified Moslem world across the south and east of the Mediterranean (the third option coming automatically as a result of the second)?

As Europeans, we need to think of what is best for us.  If Israel is weakened, or ceases to be, then what will become of the Jewish people?  They will come flooding back across the Mediterranean, claiming a right to abode in Europe because their ancestors happened to be here for some time.  They will use every slur in the book, such as the Holyhoax and the oft used weapon of accusing of anti-Semitism those who do not wish to be ruled by Jews.  They will bring with them a renewed hatred of the Goyim for encouraging the Arab takeover of Israel; a hatred which will surely see the destruction of Europe by multi-cultists accelerated.


To the 'National Socialists', 'anti-Semites', 'Identity Christians' and others who can see the hidden Jewish hand behind liberalism and 'political correctness', I ask you, if you can see the harm inflicted on Europe by those with the Jewish mindset, then surely the solution to all our woes is to end their presence here? Only a lunatic such as a 'Hollywood Nazi' would wish the genocide of the Jewish people, so realistically if the harm of the diaspora is to be stopped, then the Jews, Maranos and Crypto-Jews, need to be removed from our lands. 

If they are to be removed, they have to be removed to somewhere else.
Adolf Hitler understood the Jewish question just as did Theodor Herzl. Although coming from different positions, both understood that Assimilation of Jewry and Europe would mean the death of both. Herzl proposed the creation of a Jewish State. Hitler proposed the removal of Jews from Europe, ideally to a new homeland far removed from our borders. Joseph Stalin also understood the need for a Jewish State. Stalin took the need for a Jewish homeland to the point of creating a Jewish State in Biro-bidjan, near the Chinese border with Russia. All three thinkers were right!

It is time for Europeans worldwide to stop allowing outsiders, traitors and self-haters to dictate what we should care about. The Israeli authorities have so far killed just short of 2,000 'Palestinians'. This is sad for the families involved, as indeed it is sad for the families of the Jews killed by the Arabs. But what does it mean to Europeans? Ultimately, we have to view the Israel-Palestine conflict through the lens of how it impacts upon our lives. In the end, the deaths of all 2 million Gazans are not worth a single tear in Europe - they simply do not matter. What matters is the survival of our people; nothing else.


In Bradford, the MPs who are supposed to represent the people of the city, David Ward, Gerry Sutcliffe and George Galloway, have been bending over backwards to suck up to the Moslem colonisers who they rely upon to get elected to a life of excess and corruption in Westminster.  Ward broke UK law by speaking out in support of Hamas terrorist attacks upon civilians - but was not arrested.  Galloway routinely wears Moslem garb and praises invaders of our land, as well as using rhetoric wich incites violence and encourages UK passport holders to murder people overseas as well as indigenous Britons.  Sutcliffe is less sycophantic to the colonisers as the other two, but he also uses his Parliamentary position to do the bidding of the colonisers, by interfering in the affairs of a foreign country, rather than concerning himself with the well-being of the one he is elected to serve.

The multiculti nightmare which is destroying Europe can only be halted when those behind it have been banished - and that means physically expelling those of the liberal-Judaic mind. The treacherous MPs who would have English soldiers killed for the people of Gaza, and who regularly incite colonisers to attack non-Moslems are a symptom of the Judaic malaise. Regardless of the authenticity of their claims to Israel, only by 'returning' the Jews to Israel - and encouraging its expansion - can we regain control of our lands, expel the parasites from Pakistan etc, and deal with the traitors of our own blood by the only means which suits those who collaborate with our enemies.
Until we see an end to the Jewish presence in Europe (indeed outside Israel) we will continue to see such horrific examples of coloniser chutzpah as the flying of the Palestinian flag in Tower Hamlets and Bradford by politicians who hate the English people.

Lutfur Rahman is an anti-White bigot who is known for his corruption, criminality and all round typical Pakistani behaviour. Rahman is also the Mayor of Tower Hamlets in the Pakistani-occupied East End of London. His fellow parasites have ethnically-cleansed the indigenous Cockneys from the East End, erecting the largest Mosque in Europe whilst converting Churches to their vile cult. The East End Mosque is an infamous breeding ground of ISIS/ISIL-style terrorists.

Liberals whine about the West Bank being colonised by Jews and Palestinians being displaced. the same liberals are silent about Pakistani colonisation of the East End and the displacement of Englishmen. Rahman boasts about building thousands of Council Houses for his people. How does this differ from the settlements built in Samaria and Judea (the 'West Bank')? It differs only because those being displaced in England are White, and liberals don't give a damn about us.

It is truly sad to see the organised Right and the Third Position siding with Palestine. Palestine/Pakistan - they differ only by a few letters. Culturally, religiously, parasitically, criminally, violently - they are the same. We would not get involved in a dispute involving Pakistan, so why bother getting involved with Palestanis/Pakistinians?


The only solution to the problems facing Europe is to follow in the footsteps of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Theodor Herzl - to embrace Zionism as a National concept (as opposed to a base of operations for a Global Jewish hegemony). A strong and large Israel stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, with room to home all the Jews of the entire world; a nation with access to oil; a nation which can be self-reliant and have no need to interact with the outside world; a nation which can turn its back on the parasitism of the Wandering Jew; the nation dreamt of by Ze'ev Jabotinsky - this is the solution to the Jewish problem and to the liberal multi-culti nightmare. Those who have a logical and understandable animosity to Organised Jewry, need to face the reality that the only way to fight parasitism is to give the would-be parasites room to live exclusively amongst themselves. If they can adjust to living worthwhile lives without exploiting others, so much the better; if not, that isn't our problem.

We need to stop the bloodletting in Europe - to save our kin in the Ukraine. What happens to the 'Palestinians' has as much bearing upon our well-being as a Chinaman stepping on an ant. It is sad for the ant, but doesn't matter insofar as the survival of the European people is concerned. What happens in Europe does matter - That should be our focus, not a distraction on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean.


1 comment:

  1. Response to below.


    That is precisely what the jew wants.... .... Judaism demands jews at least subjugate the gentile world, or complete the creation with the extermination of the leftovers... that's all non jew.


    So the plan will only leverage their deceptive efforts..... the Eretz Israel prophesy fulfilled a precursor to the other. Their emissaries will continue to infest governance and work to ensure the diasporisation of Europeans amongst others with accelerated vigour and in accordance with the extermination plan.....

    It is naïve to suggest that appeasement will satiate the needs of the malevolent who cares not one iota about your plans or assumption that contradict theirs.







    The only solution to the problems facing Europe is to follow in the footsteps of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Theodor Herzl - to embrace Zionism as a National concept (as opposed to a base of operations for a Global Jewish hegemony). A strong and large Israel stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, with room to home all the Jews of the entire world; a nation with access to oil; a nation which can be self-reliant and have no need to interact with the outside world; a nation which can turn its back on the parasitism of the Wandering Jew; the nation dreamt of by Ze'ev Jabotinsky - this is the solution to the Jewish problem and to the liberal multi-culti nightmare. Those who have a logical and understandable animosity to Organised Jewry, need to face the reality that the only way to fight parasitism is to give the would-be parasites room to live exclusively amongst themselves. If they can adjust to living worthwhile lives without exploiting others, so much the better; if not, that isn't our problem

    ReplyDelete