The 14 Words

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Getting Rid of The English

Genocide is "the deliberate extermination of a people or nation". This involves the destruction of a peopls' culture, the theft of their land, and ultimately the physical elimination of those people.

The English, as indigenous inhabitants of the British Isles, are experiencing the preliminary stages of organised genocide. This involves: the 'deconstruction' of their culture and social institutions; encouragement by the State of anti-English hatred; of population displacement, replacement and colonisation (ethnic cleansing); and the enforcement of unlawful Statute to suppress dissent by the English people.

Genocide by a Treasonous State

The indictment summarises the manner in which the treasonous State (the UK Government) is pursuing a policy to ensure "there are no indigenous people in Britain".

According to the United Nations Convention on Genocide [1] 

genocide is a crime under international law, where the prescribed punishment is not subject to the limitations of time and place. The UN Convention defines genocide as any of a number of acts committed with the intent to: destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group; deliberatedly inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Already the UK State is beginning to actively pursue two of the defined methods of genocide - against the English people.

Cultural 'Deconstruction'

The head of the British army, General Sir Richard Dannatt has observed: 

"We can’t wish the Islamist challenge to our society away and I believe that the army both in Iraq and Afghanistan and probably wherever we go next, is fighting the foreign dimension of the challenge to our accepted way of life." He went on to say "We need to face up to the Islamist threat, to those who act in the name of Islam and in a perverted way try to impose Islam by force on societies that do not wish it." Most relevant to the historical ’dimension’, 
he continues:
"When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn’t make undue progress because there is a moral and spiritual vacuum in this country. Our society has always been embedded in Christian values; once you have pulled the anchor up there is a danger that our society moves with the prevailing wind. There is an element of the moral compass spinning. I think it is up to society to realise that is the situation we are in" [2].

Rear Admiral Chris Parry warns: 
“Globalisation makes assimilation seem redundant … [the process] acts as a sort of reverse colonisation, where groups of people are self-contained, going back and forth between their countries, exploiting sophisticated networks and using instant communications on phones and the internet” [3]. 
In his speech, Rear Admiral Perry identified the most dangerous flashpoints by overlaying maps showing the regions most threatened by factors such as agricultural decline, booming youth populations, water shortages, rising sea levels and radical Islam. In particular he stressed that these mass population movements could lead to the “Rome scenario” – a reference to the collapse of the western Roman empire in the 4th and 5th centuries under repeated blows from groups such as Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Suevi, Huns and Vandals surging over its borders. Rear Admiral Parry went on to say he was not labelling any particular group as threatening stability, but observed that there were already more than 70 diaspora groups in Britain.

False Stereotyping - 'Mad, Bad and Violent Britons'

Some of the 'leading figures' of political science and cultural theory, within academia, actively involved in promoting the political ideologies of multiculturalism, identity politics, diversifism and cultural Marxism, target the native ethnic British people (and the English people in particular) for unjustified opprobrium [4].

'Research' work, including studies sponsored by Goverment departments and agencies, use bogus methods (including Marxist-Freudian 'psycho-sociological' pseudo-science) to demonise the indigenous (white) population of Britain. These studies, highly regarded within academia, portray the British people as "melancholic", "violent", "self-loathing" and "manic" [5] - with a predilection for indulging in a "morbidity of heritage" [6].

One especially disgusting piece of ESRC-funded 'psychoanalytical social' research opined: 

"there is something quintessentially mad about British identity and it is based on thousands of years of hatred of the Other" [7].
Much of this so-called 'research' is little more than sophistry - the clever construction of narrative. There is much quoting from like-minded academics, but little original work on verifiable source material. And, not surprisingly, we find much of the arguments expressed only within a Marxist world view (of European colonialism, in particular). There is a noticeable avoidance in dealing with facts. This is perhaps not surprising given that the facts show the English to be extraordinary tolerant (of 'others') and law-abiding.

State-fomented Violence Against The English

An English person, or native Briton, is much less likely to commit a racist crime, and more likely than expected to be a victim, than a person from the minority ethnic community (as shown by Home Office, Police, CPS, and British Crime Survey data). Most interestingly official data (Home Office, Ministry of Justice, BCS) shows the native community to be the most law-abiding of all the (identified) ethnic groups (within England and Wales).

There are more white victims of racially motivated homicide, and more white victims of interracial homicide, than there are ethnic minority victims - despite the ethnic minority community being less than 10 per cent of the total population (196 victims vs. 109 victims between 2003 and 2006) [8] [9] [10]. The likelihood of a member of the minority (BME) community making a violent racist attack against a member of the 'white' (English) community is approximately 30-fold greater than an English person committing a violent racist attack against a member of the BME community.

The evidence is that this extraordinary situation is the result of decades of anti-"white" (anti-English) hatred being whipped-up within the BME communities by the State, by extremist State-sanctioned political groups, and by 'change agencies' .

The culture of anti-white bigotry - a consequence of 'false stereotyping' - is endemic within State agencies such as the Home Office and Police Service. Even the Crown Prosecution Service observes: 

"The police were more likely to identify the cause as a racist incident where the defendent was white than when the defendent was African Carribbean or Asian" [14]. 
Both the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service portray 'hate crime' as "typically committed by white people" - even though (as the actual crime data shows) such crime is far less typical within the white community, when compared to such crime within the ethnic minority communities.

The Macpherson Report (February 1999) into police investigation of the murder of Stephen Lawrence (in April 1993) is widely regarded (especially by those who have not read it) as having 'proved' the existence of racism in the police service and in (white) British society generally. Unfortunately the 
Macpherson Inquiry was little more than a political circus. It is worth quoting at some length the conclusions reached by academics Norman Dennis, George Erdos and Ahmed Al-Shahi: 
"Although the Inquiry had the appearance of a judicial procedure, it came close to the Stalinist show trials of the 1930s. Rules of procedure and evidence were relaxed, and indeed no evidence of racism in the police who dealt with the case was ever produced. Witnesses were harrased by members of the Inquiry team and by the crowd in the public gallery. They were urged to confess their guilt and repent ... They were even asked to testify to the existence of the racist thoughts of other people" [11].
It is clearly a part of the institutional thinking within the Crown Prosecution Service that racist crime is committed (only) by white people [12][13][14]. A detailed analysis of ant-white racialist ideology that appears to underpin much of the CPS institutional thinking is available here [15].

We also find this form of bigoted thinking extending down to the regional and local centres of law enforcement. In a press release issued just 4 days after the London 2005 suicide bombings a joint meeting between representatives of a local (city) constabulary and no less than 7 different ethnic minority support agencies clearly identifies those that "behave in racist and hateful ways" as white people - and only white people [16].

State Lies - And Bogus Research

This extreme bigotry directed towards white people is encouraged by publications from State sponsored/endorsed organisations that portray white people as the only perpetrators of racial violence (assaults and homocide) [17]. Unfortunately this misrepresentation also extends into academia.

For example, a book used widely as 'teaching material' and recommended as 'required reading' within our universities attempts to portray all racist crime as being perpetrated by white people. The authors of that HRW publication go on to falsely declare that: “All studies show that the majority of victims of racist violence are Asian” [18]. That is untrue. Notably the authors used the 1991 British Crime Survey for their analysis of racist violence; however they would have known that it was not until after 1994 that the BCS data included "white" victims of racist crime.

Unfortunately that is the kind of garbage often put out, that purports to be well-researched work.

The State seeks to justify and excuse the extraordinarily disproportionate number of violent offences against "white" people (by members of the BME community) on the ridiculous basis that white people form the majority population [19]. Clearly this is a crude attempt at deceit since these State agencies must know the number of victims should be proportionate to the size of the offenders' community - not the other way around.

The suggestion is clear - that the "white" community should expect to have to suffer hugely disproportionate numbers of racist attacks against members of their community, for the reason that they are in the majority.

The path down which this sort of racialist thinking takes us is chilling in the extreme.

The Politics of Anti- "White" (anti-English) Hatred

The political ideology behind this surreptitious ethnocide has a need for a heretical 'other' to legitimise the belief. Dr. Kaufman of the University of London observes: 
"Multiculturalism as a Left-wing movement is problematic without a dominant ethnic group against which to define itself" [20]. 
And, of course, the so called 'dominant group' is the native, indigenous population.

The highly offensive remark by BBC Chairman Greg Dyke towards the members of a boardroom meeting - of their being "hideously white" - is well known. Unfortunately this is a quite typical attitude of members of the political and cultural elite. Professor Ted Cantle, a senior race relations adviser for the Labour Government (and who wrote the definitive report on the 2001 riots in Bradford and Oldham) described in 2006 parts of the country as being “unhealthily all white", a phrase that appeared to be an attempt to unfairly place the blame for ethnic tensions on the white community [21].

The use of the word "white" is a political code-word - used to identify the English in such a way that denies proper recognition, but allows for the most negative of connotations.

State-Sponsered Ethnic Cleansing

A major policy of the New Labour Government was to encourage mass 'immigration' - a policy with the purpose of causing massive dislocation, relocation and replacement of the indigenous native population. The hostility of successive Governments to the majority indigenous population (that might one day decide to demand its right for self-determination) has resulted in a policy of piecemeal ethnic cleansing.

However, very occasionally, the mask of the political elite slips, and we see the real agenda. In October 2009 the former Government adviser Andrew Neather revealed that the Labour Party's mass immigration policy was driven by extreme political ideology. In February 2010 a request under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act produced a Government document [24] that clearly showed the principle purpose for mass immigration was political - to force massive social change.

Not surprisingly members of the BME community are easily recruited into supporting the political agenda of mass immigration. Mr. Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones is widely celebrated by the media and political establishment as the 'Black Farmer'. He was selected as 2010 Conservative Parliamentary candidate for Cheltenham, in Wiltshire. In a magazine article he is quoted as saying: 
“Our parents established beachheads in the cities; it is now up to our generation to move out of those beachheads and claim the rest of Britain as our own.” [23]. 
Clearly he believes that allusions to invasion and occupation to be a most appropriate metaphor for mass immigration. It is a policy of colonization - aggressively pursued.

Enforcement of Liberal Fascism

The weapon of choice for the political elite, against any members of the indigenous population who show dissent against loss of their homeland, is the charge of 'racism'. Those that express opposition to this State-sponsored genocide are frequently accused in this hate mongering manner, and are threatened with (or experience) unlawful assault and false-imprisonment by the political State's police force.

It may seem strange, on reflection, that this form of particular insult, or motivation for a criminal act, should be given such particular weight by the State. For example, for a person to be abused or assaulted because they are disabled is just as distressing (if not more so) than to suffer the same fate because of one's racial appearance. They cannot help their disability. And yet there is no particular State sanction, against 'disability-ism'.

Of course it is not the insult that counts, it is the taboo subject. Somebody can be incredibly rude and hurtful to people without the police intervening, but the 'deconstructionists' have negotiated a special taboo when it comes to the physical characteristics (or characterisation of) race. This is because it suits their social programme of destroying homogeneous nations. The 'powers that be' do not have a social engineering interest in disabled people. The pursuance of 'racism' as the ultimate taboo is the means to a political end. This is about changing the face of a nation.


[1] UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, New York, 9th December 1948

[2] Sir General Dannatt, source: The Daily Mail, 13/10/06

[3] Rear Admiral Parry, ‘World Security’conference, at The Royal United Services Institute, June 2006

[4] 'After Empire - Melancholic or Convivial Culture', Paul Gilroy, Routledge, 2004 - A Critique and Response, February 2006.document

[5] 'After Empire - Melancholic or Convivial Culture', Paul Gilroy, Routledge, 2004, page 111

[6] Ibid., page 109

[7] 'Identity, Home and Asylum: A Psycho-Social Perspective', Simon Clarke and Steven Garner, Centre for Psycho-Social Studies, University of the South West of England, 2005.

[8] Ethnicity and The Experience of Crime in England and Wales', Tony Shell, November 2006 document

[9] A Preliminary Analysis of The Ministry of Justice Document: Statistics on Race and The Criminal Justice System - 2006', Tony Shell, November 2007 document

[10] 'Interracial Violence [Briefing Report]', Tony Shell, January 2009 document

[11] ‘Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics’
by Norman Dennis, George Erdos and Ahmed Al-Shahi, Pub. CIVITAS 2000

[12] 'Race for Justice ­ A Review of CPS Decision Making for Possible Racial Bias at Each Stage of the Prosecution Process', The Crown Prosecution Service,12th October 2003, para 109

[13] 'Race for Justice ­ A Review of CPS Decision Making for Possible Racial Bias at Each Stage of the Prosecution Process', The Crown Prosecution Service,12th October 2003,, para 141

[14]'Race for Justice ­ A Review of CPS Decision Making for Possible Racial Bias at Each Stage of the Prosecution Process', The Crown Prosecution Service,12th October 2003, para 65

[15] 'The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Racialist Policy', Tony Shell, May 2007 document

[16] Devon & Cornwall Constabulary, Police News Release, 11th July 2005

[17] National Civil Rights Movement (NCRM) South West, South West Racist Attacks Bulletin No 3

[18] 'Racist Violence in The United Kingdom', Human Rights Watch, 1997

[19] 'Crime and Ethnicity', The Neighbourhood Renewel Unit, Office of The Deputy Prime Minister, 2006

[20] Dr. Eric Kaufmann, School of Politics and Sociology, Birbeck College, University of London - presentation to CRONEM Conference, Roehampton University, June 2005

[21] The Sunday Times, April 23, 2006

[22] 'Migration: An Economic and Social Analysis', Home Office and Cabinet Office Report, October 2000

[23] Emmanuel-Jones, New Statesman, 28 August 2006.

[24] 'How The Government Has Declared War On White People', Leo McKinsty, The Daily Express, August 9 2007. Link

No comments:

Post a Comment