The 14 Words

Thursday, 19 September 2013


illustration added by me. J.H.

Does everyone have an intuitive understanding of The Golden Rule, the rule that forms the basis of all laws, ‘do unto others as you would have done unto you’? It is tempting to think that everyone does, but is there any evidence to support this, apart from just personal acquaintance with it? White Europeans have a history that is inseparable from this concept and without it, would never have been able to form the Nations and Empires that identify them throughout history. However when you investigate African Negro psychology and history, you find that they had no knowledge of this law until White Europeans came and attempted to teach them of the benefits it would bring, if they observed it.

The African Negro is unique for having based his entire economy on captive slavery as far back as we can tell, with the bigger capturing and enslaving the smaller. This ‘unjust’ treatment of each other even went so far as to include eating the weaker. This is still a common occurrence today for various purposes, food, magic or just simply tradition. The last state in Africa to outlaw slavery was within the last ten years and I would suggest that since it is still socially acceptable and goes on anyway, this was in order to receive aid from ‘The International Community’, rather than from some sudden flash of reason that what they had been doing for thousands of years was unnatural. Enslaving each other just because you can would be the logical outcome of not being able to comprehend The Golden Rule.

When we think, we think in words, and our language defines the limits of what we can think about. There are many words in different languages that cannot be accurately translated into another language, as they represent a unique thought process that is not replicated elsewhere. The Zulu to English language dictionary has only 250 pages and like the other African languages, does not include a working definition for any abstract concepts, as it does not appear to be possible for them to understand them. Law is an abstract concept, just like promise, obligation, morality, time, consequences and remorse. Therefore, the idea of putting yourself in the position of another would not be possible for the African Negro to do, a semblance of it could be taught, but only at the level of doing something in order to gain an immediate reward, or to avoid an immediate punishment. Another result of this relative inability would be that since the White administration ended in South Africa, nothing has been maintained. You even have to bring your own equipment to hospital if you want a Doctor to help you. The idea of preventing something from happening in the future by doing something now, like routine maintenance, is just not reasonable to expect them to think of.

When we see someone in pain, or bleeding, our instincts are to help, yet in Africa, the sight of someone in distress instils a blood lust in the negro that spurs them on to increase the agony of the victim in horrific ways. This can be seen in the millions of negroes with limbs lopped off in Rwanda, and in the infamous ‘necklace’ where a tyre full of petrol would be put around the victims neck, before torturing them so much that they set themselves on fire to make it stop. Much pride is taken in this savagery, with the torture and killings being videotaped so the incident can be relived and shown to friends. The slightest irritation can be seen as a cause for murder, showing a complete lack of being able to put yourself in another’s shoes. Some tribes of Red Indians were similar, skinning women and children alive and staking captives out and starting fires on their chests. Far from feeling compassion for their victims, once the pain was apparent it would encourage and excite them all the more. This is all well documented.

Even in the so-called civilized world, this still goes on. There are many accounts of Negroes becoming inflamed at the sight of someone bleeding and random bystanders not helping, but actually joining in with the attack. Many of these attacks have little or no apparent reason for them. There was a recent case in America where after shooting the mother in the leg, the gunman then shot her new born baby in the face. This is similar to what happens in Liberian cities, where young men boast of killing pregnant women, only over there, they then eat the body parts too.

It may be said that White Europeans used to use torture to gain confessions, but this was done to criminals, not just because people were weaker, and they were not tortured to death for sadistic pleasure, but tortured to ensure that they were telling the truth. They had already been found guilty and the torture was to get the exact truth of what had happened out of them. After the torture they were always given the chance to retract their confession, in case they had just said it to make the torture stop.

We have a history of building civilizations and I think this is down to our intuitive understanding of The Law. There is no history of Negro civilizations and I think this is down to their not being under The Law. It does not come naturally to them. It may be beneficial for them as a group to obey it, but it is not a natural occurrence to, and not a part of their instinctual make-up. The evidence from language, behaviour, history and current events seems to confirm this.

When they ‘feel’ wronged, then they take vengeance regardless of whether it is justified or not. A recent example of this is in the Trayvon Martin case, who was shot in self defence by Neighbourhood Watchman George Zimmerman, when Trayvon was pounding his head into the pavement. The court case proved beyond any doubt that George Zimmerman was innocent, yet this did not matter to the American Negro  They believed they had been wronged and they wanted to take revenge. The law was seen by them as a means to obtain vengeance, not as a means to obtain justice. When Zimmerman was found innocent and not guilty, there were demands to try him again and threats to kill all white people on twitter. Many revenge attacks on random white people predictably followed.

I am not trying to put negroes down here, rather to just objectively review the evidence without any emotional attachment. The relative lack of capacity for abstract thinking does manifest in positive ways as well as negative. Depression and neurosis used to be virtually unheard of for Negroes  the same with schizophrenia and suicide. When amongst their own people, their ways are not seen as being problematic for them.

Is it fair to force people to go against their own nature and traditions in their own country? I don’t think we should be forcing Africans to conform to the white man’s law (their own term for it) in their homelands. Is it fair to make the white man live alongside someone who does not have the law written in his heart? I don’t think that is fair either. I don’t believe in universal laws, we are under our law, we know what it is, and we can rightly judge our own people’s actions because of it. But we have no moral authority to judge another race’s actions, as we have no personal standard with which to compare it. There is a video online of Negroes hunting, killing and eating one another. This does not look to me like they have any conscience about doing this, and from their own explanation, it seems to just be natural behaviour for them. It’s the way they have lived for thousands of years and the idea of changing it makes no sense to them, unless they are to be immediately rewarded with guns or food for doing so.

When we talk about individual sovereignty, and the obligation to others that it entails, we are not just encouraging it because it is beneficial to us, we intuitively know that it is the correct way to live, for our people. We have either internalised the golden rule of ‘do unto others’ or it is intuitive for us. It does not appear to be so for other peoples though, and we may be showing a dangerous lack of imagination in thinking otherwise, and even committing an injustice by judging some people’s actions according to it.


  1. Love to see what that intellectually lobotomised wog socket slut who posted that all jewish propaganda the other day has to say about this post.

    On an evolutionary scale, 1 out of 1000 negroes are fit for Western civilisation.

    The above ratio is accurate with degree of tolerence of +- 1.

  2. Imaginative and intelligent article. The western world, or more precisely the Caucasian folk, are imcompatible with Negroid types. The girl and others like our fellow commentator describes above, are simply usimg the poor, unthinking Negro, almost as a two fingered gesture to their parents. Im addition, the poor low IQ Negroid is a fashion statement if you like. The Juden knew this incompatibility would lead to what has happened. What are we to do, again, that is the question.


  3. I appreciate your comments on the posts I publish on this Blog, IRONKRAFT. In the comment above you state:

    The Juden knew this incompatibility would lead to what has happened. What are we to do, again, that is the question.

    And that indeed is the question. After racking my brain I cannot see a peaceful solution, the only solution I can see will have to be brutal and violent (The enemy Jew has got to the position of power he enjoy's now by violence and terrorism).

    We need Nationalist Governance throughout all the 'alien' colonised Nations that is based on honouring the Creator and His race - The White Race

    WE must make it impossible for other races to reside in our lands, this is only feasible if we extradite the enemy Jew and his minions, the white race traitor politicians Who in my opinion should not be extradited but Hung for their acts of treason against their own race

    The Negro is not a compatible species with the European, this has been proved time and time again. We must provide assisted passage back to Africa Where they fucking belong And they should be grateful for that, the only alternative we have to deal with them is to slaughter them en masse

    But of course you know as well as I do that until we deal with the Jewish Problem Nothing, absolutely nothing can ever be achieved, while the enemy Jew SATAN holds sway we are pissing against the wind.

    WE therefore have to put our faith in the Creator for divine guidance, I know I am at one with the true Creator and that he is guiding me, that's why I do this Blog. You can agree or disagree with me but I believe Adolf Hitler was sent down by the Creator to save our race just as Jesus was.

    The Bible itself says that Satan will rule the Earth for 1,000 years, well I think that 1,000 years reign is almost up. Don't you?

  4. Some of the old Biblical parodies and sayings are purposefully speculative. Satan ruling for a thousand years, is presumably in terms of an exact start, and his end of rule, open to speculation, and only known to God. Even taking all Christianity out of the equasion, as some White Racial Separatists want, we have to deal with the Zionist/Talmudic tribe anyway. I believe ALL white folk in this broad, sometimes backstabbing and paranoid movement of ours, should put our relatively small differences asside... And now create an umbrella organisation for the main, and only event worth attending... Our freedom from oppression from Zog and the Juden elites.


  5. Replies
    1. My pleasure Sven, I only reproduce articles from other sites/blogs that can further our cause/our fight against the enemy that is all around us. A good article like the one you wrote will always be reproduced on 'Hardons Blog'.