The 14 Words

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

A Basic Understanding of Zionism

Zionism markets itself as Jewish ‘Nationalism’. This is a perversion for Zionism is a parasite that pollutes and destroys. At the most fundamental level Zionist ideology must be understood as a community operating within another community for the good of the ‘guest’ nation not the host nation. Zionism has infected Europe for over 2,000 years though during the last 60 years it has been draining host country’s National wealth and funnelling it into Israel. Without continual ‘support’ from external Nations Israel would not survive.

It was during the 19th century that Karl Marx developed Zionism’s most dangerous tool of deception-Communism. With considerable contribution from Moses Hess known as the philosophical father of Zionism Marx produced material that worked on 2 levels. On the face of itDas Capital promises the ‘worker’ a utopian equality through Communism. 

However, on a deeper level what he is offering is reduction to the lowest common denominator because only then can a mass be the same. Of course this comes at a price since true ‘equality’ does not exist in nature. Thus it was necessary for Communism to formulate mechanisms to enforce ‘equality’. For the Nationalist modern ‘multicult’ policy alive in Europe should provide some insight into the inner workings.

Traditionally, or more correctly idealistically, a Nation is organically grown from the families and communities indigenous to a particular land. The Nation state would be produced from these indigenous peoples and work for them. In modern Europe, however, our indigenous Nations, be that Britain, Germany, France etc have been colonised by innumerate foreign peoples.

Even though these people no longer live in their own lands they remain a part of their own nations. We see this particularly at election times when the same face parties try to attract block votes from Muslims, Somali, and African voters. It is clear that these ‘newcomers’ have a solid community identity. They know what their community requires and use the community’s weight to achieve it. In a new land this all comes at the expense of the host community. Here we have a perfect example of the divide and conquer strategy used by Zionism. This is on a grand scale but history shows that the Zionist concept has been in use for centuries.

“The [Jewish] diaspora is commonly accepted to have begun with the 6th century BC conquest of the ancient Kingdom of Judah, destruction of the First Temple (c. 586 BC), and expulsion of the population…” Wikipedia


So the Jews are and have been a scattered people for a long time! To remain an identifiable people would suggest that they have learned to survive among ‘other’ nations without fully adapting to host cultures. 

This would mean that the ideology developed would have to be one of stealth and cunning. If one was working against the host one would not want to be found out. It may also be necessary to be some what unassuming, blend in. It is only once the underdog has gained a position of power that they can begin to show their true colours.

Though the term Zionism was actually coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890, it was Moses Hess who laid the foundation of what is considered as the philosophical base of Zionism with the book Rome and JerusalemPublished in 1862. However, it is clear that the parasitic communities have been by Zionist ideology for centuries prior to Birnbaum’s use of the term. In fact, while not wholly portrayed in the mainstream, it was William of Orange who gave Zionist Jews permission to set up their Bank of England. It was not until the late 1800’s that gentile’s become aware of Zionism. Perhaps now more confident of their power, this ideology is now less concerned of showing their true colours.

Stemming from Zionism Karl Marx, a student of Hess created Communism. His sole intention in producing this ideology was to dupe the masses. In essence Marx created the template for eternal upheaval. Again this can be seen in the original mass Jewish Bolshevik (Communist) revolution. The fundamental idea is to set each group against one another-the worker against employer, rich against poor, man against woman.

Following the initial success of the Bolshevik revolution the plan was to spread Marx’ Communism across Europe. The master plan was to dismantle and replace European culture with hollow, meaningless filth. Naturally the ideology behind this was Zionist as was the parasitic community that was to inherit power. However, Europe did not take to Communism as easily as Mother Russia so a different strategy had to be formed.


Generally speaking it was back to the academy. The Frankfurt School and its close associates the Fabian Socialists needed to redefine ‘Communism’ for a different audience. The politico-economic message of Marxism did not work in Europe so it was necessary to drive the divide and conquer method via European conduct. Thus Cultural Marxism was born and its allies political correctness and anti-Christianity. It is because of these dogmas that the divisive groups such as feminism and anti-Racism develop. The less cohesive White European society the more easily it is to corrupt and consequently control.


Enough Already

Gullible Goyim and Golden Shoahs


Pity the poor Jews. The single biggest and best argument for the reality of the Holocaust already, and – oy, such a gevuschnitz ve haff! – they can’t use it. After all, what above all else lends weight to their claims that someone would try to wipe them out? Simple: it’s their own obnoxiousness. Before the war they had been kicked out of country after country for hundreds of years and they’d always gone wriggling back, long noses sniffing for gold, shifty eyes gleaming with self-importance and greed. It’s plausible, at the very least, that one group of goys finally had enough, set out to solve their Jewish problem for good and found out that lots of other goys were happy to help or refrain from interfering.


So let’s take that as our working hypothesis. It’s all true: the Holocaust really happened as they claim it did. Six million Jews really did the Shoah-shuffle, the Belsen-boogie and the Treblinka-two-step. But even if the figures are right, and I don’t believe they are, the Jewish portrayal of the Holocaust still involves huge dishonesty and deceit. In order to promote the Holocaust as “The Vorst Thing to Happen to Anyvon in the Vorld Evah”, they rely on the fact that you can manipulate people just as effectively by concealing a truth as by inventing a lie. So here are three of the truths about twentieth-century history that Jews have tried to drop down the memory hole.

Concealed Truth #1: Jews themselves have been actively involved in mass murder and would, if they’d had their way, have been involved in much more. Jews were central to the triumph of communism in eastern Europe and served enthusiastically in the murderous communist secret police and concentration camps. If communism had taken over western Europe and America, Jews would have served just as enthusiastically there too and many Heretical readers would now not exist, because their parents or grandparents would have been murdered.
This Jewish involvement in communism is systematically concealed or denied by the mass media, helping sustain the myth of the Jew as Eternal Victim. For example, after the Second World War Jewish “Holocaust survivors” were attacked when they returned to their homes in Poland. More unjustified Gentile persecution of innocent Jews? No, the natural consequence of Jewish behavior in 1939, when the Red Army occupied half of Poland:
The Poles watched the Soviet invaders with a mixture of revulsion and fear. Not a few of us cried. My brother became so distraught that shortly after, his hair began to come out in clumps while my little sister could only ask: “How could they do this?” But as disconcerting was the emergence of a local Jewish militia which was friendly to the Red Army and had made its appearance even before the enemy had marched in. Armed and organized, its first task was to arrest the students and Boy Scouts who had been posted as guards with old carbines in some cases taller than them. The Jews roughed up the shocked youngsters, who had considered their captors as friends and classmates, before turning them over to the Soviets from whom they had prior directions. What was the fate of these young Poles? In many cases torture and death. This Jewish militia would help carry out the Soviets’ dirty work during their occupation. My family and others would fall victim to them. 
A sizable minority of Polish Jews from all levels collaborated, usually passively but often actively, with the Soviet occupiers in their liquidation of Poles in Eastern Poland in 1939-1941. (A Krzemiencian whose family deportation was headed by a Jew and cheered by young Jews along the route to the cattle cars, would later testify: “Jewish society it appears at a rate of 95% or in any case in overwhelming numbers immediately snuggled up to the new Soviet rulers and worked with them in carrying out the new order. It was largely through their help that the new order was able to set up and expand in the occupied territories.”) For many, including my kin, the last sight they had of Poland and their loved ones, was a cattle car bound for Siberia, and a Jew or Ukrainian, or both, with a rifle on every wagon. (Poland’s Holocaust)
Stories like that do great harm to the Jews’ myths about their unique suffering and victimhood, which is why you won’t hear them through the mass media. One of the world’s most famous authors, the Russian Alexander Solzhenitsyn, has sold millions of books in the English-speaking world but can’t find a publisher in English for one of his most recent and most important books, Dvesti Let Vmeste or Two Hundred Years Together. Why not? Because it’s about the relationship between Jews and Christians in Russia. Shockingly, Solzhenitsyn suggests that Jews have not always been innocent victims of Gentile oppression but have sometimes behaved badly and abused power themselves:
He states that all the nation’s ethnic groups must share the blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish experience. In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote: “If I would care to generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The Jews whose experience I saw – their life was softer than that of others.” Yet he added: “But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the actions of the Kiev Cheka [Secret Police] only by the fact that two-thirds were Jews, is certainly incorrect.” (The Guardian, 25th January 2003)
It is certainly incorrect to explain it only by that fact, but that fact is nevertheless of central importance in the history of mass murder and oppression in the Soviet Union – which is why Jews want it forgotten.

Concealed Truth #2: Many more Gentiles than Jews died during World War Two, and many more people were murdered by communists than by Nazis. Roughly sixty million people died during World War Two. If we accept the full Holocaust figure, one in ten of the war’s dead was a Jew, which means nine in ten were Gentiles. Why are the ones-in-ten endlessly in the spotlight while the nine-in-ten are ignored? After all, aren’t we all the same? Isn’t “race” just a figment of racists’ diseased imaginations? Only so long as it suits the Jews who control politics and the media. The Holocaust reveals their real opinions: Ve matter; you goyim don’t. That’s also why we hear so little about the hundred million victims of communism, especially the millions who died during the Ukrainian famine so enthusiastically organized and enforced by Jews in the Soviet secret police.

Concealed Truth #3: The concentration camps were liberated by war-criminals. Holocaust Memorial Day (H.M.D.) commemorates the liberation of Auschwitz on 27th January, 1945, by the communist Red Army. And what was the Red Army doing before, during and after the liberation of Auschwitz? Well, you won’t hear a whisper of it on H.M.D., because it would “complicate” the story of Innocent Jewish Victims and Evil Gentile Nazis, but the Red Army was committing some of the worst war-crimes in history:
“Red Army soldiers don’t believe in ‘individual liaisons’ with German women,” wrote the playwright Zakhar Agranenko in his diary when serving as an officer of marine infantry in East Prussia. “Nine, ten, twelve men at a time – they rape them on a collective basis.” Beria and Stalin, back in Moscow, knew perfectly well what was going on from a number of detailed reports. One stated that “many Germans declare that all German women in East Prussia who stayed behind were raped by Red Army soldiers”. Numerous examples of gang rape were given – “girls under 18 and old women included”.
Natalya Gesse, a close friend of the scientist Andrei Sakharov, had observed the Red Army in action in 1945 as a Soviet war correspondent. “The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty,” she recounted later. “It was an army of rapists.” Drink of every variety, including dangerous chemicals seized from laboratories and workshops, was a major factor in the violence. It seems as if Soviet soldiers needed alcoholic courage to attack a woman. But then, all too often, they drank too much and, unable to complete the act, used the bottle instead with appalling effect. A number of victims were mutilated obscenely. 
The novelist Vasily Grossman, a war correspondent attached to the invading Red Army, soon discovered that rape victims were not just Germans. Polish women also suffered. So did young Russian, Belorussian and Ukrainian women who had been sent to Germany by the Wehrmacht for slave labour. “Liberated Soviet girls quite often complain that our soldiers rape them,” he noted. “One girl said to me in tears: ‘He was an old man, older than my father’.” The rape of Soviet women and girls seriously undermines Russian attempts to justify Red Army behaviour on the grounds of revenge for German brutality in the Soviet Union. In Dahlem, Soviet officers visited Sister Kunigunde, the mother superior of Haus Dahlem, a maternity clinic and orphanage. The officers and their men behaved impeccably. In fact, the officers even warned Sister Kunigunde about the second-line troops following on behind. Their prediction proved entirely accurate. Nuns, young girls, old women, pregnant women and mothers who had just given birth were all raped without pity. 
Older Berliners still remember the screams every night. It was impossible not to hear them because all the windows had been blown in. Estimates of rape victims from the city’s two main hospitals ranged from 95,000 to 130,000. One doctor deduced that out of approximately 100,000 women raped in the city, some 10,000 died as a result, mostly from suicide. The death rate was thought to have been much higher among the 1.4 million estimated victims in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia. Altogether at least two million German women are thought to have been raped, and a substantial minority, if not a majority, appear to have suffered multiple rape. 
If anyone attempted to defend a woman against a Soviet attacker it was either a father trying to defend a daughter or a young son trying to protect his mother. “The 13-year old Dieter Sahl,” neighbours wrote in a letter shortly after the event, “threw himself with flailing fists at a Russian who was raping his mother in front of him. He did not succeed in anything except getting himself shot.” (“They raped every German female from eight to 80”, The Guardian, 1st May 2002)
Ask yourself how often these facts appear in the Western media. Once for every thousand mentions of the Holocaust? Once for every ten thousand mentions of the Holocaust? And when they do appear, they’re used as feminist propaganda against White men, not as proof of the evil nature of Jew-invented communism. Nevertheless, the armies of Western nations like Britain and America committed war-crimes of a similar kind, if not on a similar scale. The Second World War was full of horror and suffering, but thanks to Jewish control of politics and the media, the Jewish share gets more and more attention as everything else gets less and less.

If you ask why this has happened, some of the best answers have been supplied by that very rare figure: a Jew who is prepared to criticize his own race when it behaves badly. The American academic Norman Finkelstein, whose own parents were genuine Holocaust survivors, has challenged Shoah business with acute insight and skill:
The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world’s most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a “victim” state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable benefits accrue to this specious victimhood – in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified. 
The Holocaust industry represents neither “those who were murdered” nor Jewish survivors and heirs. It is an extortion racket wrapped in the mantle of Jewish suffering. Consider recent developments. In the name of Holocaust victims, the Holocaust industry seized control of denationalized properties worth billions of dollars in the former East Germany. The legitimate Jewish heirs are currently suing the Holocaust industry to return their properties. Nearly all the monies in the Swiss banks settlement will go not to Jewish survivors or heirs but into the coffers of Jewish organizations. (www.NormanFinkelstein.com)
Exploitation of the Shoah has showered gold on Jews for decades and enabled them to manipulate Whites into acting not in their own best interests but in the best interests of their greatest enemies. Holocaustianity is now the official religion of White nations, allowing Jews to cry over and over again: “Let my people, goy!”
• Let my people fill your heads with lies and propaganda.
• Let my people defraud and rob you of billions of dollars.
• Let my people re-write your laws to take away your freedom of speech and send anyone who questions us to jail.
• Let my people bring non-white savages flooding in to rape your women, murder your men and sooner or later take over your nations.
The lesson Jews have drawn for themselves from the Second World War is that they need their own special nation where only Jews are welcome; the lesson they’ve drawn for Whites is that we need to hand our nations over to non-whites. In 1906, there was little chance of wars and massacres happening again in Britain or America; in 2006, thanks to decades of Jew-inspired non-white immigration, the chances are rising all the time. Because of their “Holocaust”, we suffer – but that’s Shoah-biz.

LUKE O’FARRELL 


Guns To Be Banned In America!

Obama Administration Working With U.N. On A Global Gun Ban

The Obama administration is in the middle negotiating a Small Arms Treaty with the U.N. that would effectively place a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.

This ban would affect all private gun owners and will be used to implement an international gun registry of all guns and ammo.

Despite the fact that Americans overwhelmingly oppose the idea of banning firearms, this administration seems hell bent on limiting your access to guns. From the politician who admitted that he would rather see people become victims of crime than allow them to own a gun, to this administrations work with The National League of Cities to ban guns in cities and townships throughout America, there is no doubt that our right to bear arms is under attack.

The future of the 2nd Amendment is in serious jeopardy. Every gun owner in America needs to wake up, our right to keep and bear arms is about to be put into the hands of the U.N. who will severely limit your ability to own any rifles, shotguns and handguns.


A conference is being held in July 2012 in New York to draft the final language of the treaty. Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration have already signed on to support the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty.

U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kans.) and 57 other senators sent a letter to President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warning them that they do not have legal authority to sign any treaty that would affect an Americans right to own firearms.

Read more @ offgridsurvival.com/obamaadministration-unglobalgunban/


Related Stories


Popular female Pakistani singer killed in drive-by shooting


(CNN) -- A popular female Pakistani singer who defied the Taliban's decree against singing and dancing was shot and killed in northwest Pakistan Monday night, police and hospital officials told CNN.

Authorities described the singer's ex-husband as a suspect in the case, and said early indications were that the Taliban were not involved, according to police official Imtiaz Altaf.

Ghazala Javed, who recorded scores of songs in her native Pashto language and became a household name among young, progressive ethnic Pashtuns in northwest Pakistan, had just left a beauty salon and was driving home with her father when gunmen on a motorcycle raced towards their car and sprayed it with bullets, Altaf said.

Javed was hit with six bullets and pronounced dead at a hospital in Peshawar, the capital of Pakistan's Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, according to hospital official Rahim Afridi. Javed's father also was killed, police said.

In recent years the rise of the Pakistani Taliban in the region and the group's ban against singing and dancing made it difficult for Javed and other musical artists to perform and record songs in Pakistan. Javed recorded and taped many of her latest songs and music videos in nearby Dubai.

Last year Javed made headlines when she asked for a divorce from her husband after she reportedly found out that he had at least one other wife. It was a rare decision in a deeply conservative and male-dominated society where many view a woman's demand for a divorce as a dishonor to the husband.

Shortly after Monday night's shooting police released a statement saying Javed's sister had accused her ex-husband and two of his acquaintances. Investigators said a search was underway for the three men.



Senior Israeli Military Commander Foreshadowing Next False Flag?




Persecuting the Pig in British Schools

The humble pig. As a species it's famed for its defining quality of tasting good whether fried, roasted, or grilled.

Chops, a nice joint, some fine bacon, gammon, sausages, ham, the list of the goodies a pig provides us with is a mouth watering one.


Not in many schools now though, we can't go offending those Jews and Muslims, that just wouldn't be on. Heaven forbid Hakima in her hijab should have to look on horrified at a true Brit tucking into ham, egg, and chips.

In Haringey 37 out of 47 schools operate a pork ban. Tower Hamlets it's 85 out of 90 who don't have a pork option. Luton it's 23 out of 57. Newham 25 out of 75.

Haringey Council recently issued advice to all schools recommending a pork ban in order to accommodate staff and pupils who are not allowed contact with the fine meats of the pig for religious reasons.

As ever it's down to religious reasons. Oh woe, woe, thrice times woe, if little Solomon should be left shaking beneath his skullcap when a boy nearby dined on sausage and mash.

Not a thought for the feelings of non-Muslims (or non-Jews for that matter) should todays dinner time treat be some ritually slaughtered halal or kosher muck. Eat it and shut up; it may not be your religion but you'll be prejudiced if you have feelings about it.

Like so many other things in todays Britain, the pig is falling victim to political correctness and pandering to minority gone mad.

Instead of banning pork, every school in Britain should in fact be having a Pig Day -full English breakfast, and children encouraged to investigate recipes and cook wonderful dishes based around the fine meat which is pork.

It would be enriching, it's only fair these minorities benefit from a diversity which their culture would otherwise deny them. After all, we're expected to think that's good for us, equality means it must also be good for them.



Flash Mob of 15-20 Black Teens Attack In Chicago

One man was smoking a cigar Saturday night on a bench in the Streeterville neighborhood when his evening was interrupted by a group of young men who robbed and beat him. Another man was parking his motor scooter outside Northwestern University’s downtown campus when the same group apparently made him their next victim, police said.

Police believe the group of about 15 to 20 youths in their mid- to late teens also was responsible for two more attacks moments later along the lakefront.

At least seven people thought to be part of the group were arrested Saturday in connection with the robberies and mob action, a crime that has become a problem in Streeterville, the Gold Coast and the Magnificent Mile, authorities said.



Dvonte Sykes, 17, of the 7500 block of South Normal Avenue was charged with two felony counts of robbery and one count of mob action violence to person and property.

Two 16-year-old boys also were charged in a juvenile delinquency petition for the same incident. One boy was charged with a felony count of robbery and one count of mob action violence to person and property, police said. The other boy was charged with one count of misdemeanor theft, control of stolen property of less than $300 and mob action. The youths were not named because they are juveniles.

Two other youths, Trovolus Pickett, 17 and Derodte Wright, 18, were charged in connection with a robbery on the 300 block of East Chicago Avenue, police said.

Pickett of the 8400 block of South Dorchester Avenue was charged with three felony counts of robbery, this includes the robbery committed on the North Lake Shore Drive. Wright of the 3500 block of South State Street was charged with one count of felony robbery for the incident on East Chicago Avenue, police said.

In mid-May, Chicago police started implementing strategies to address mob action incidents, which are often coordinated via text messages or social networking websites, in downtown and neighborhoods near it. <<<MORE>>>


Surveillance Pictures Released In
Mob Attack On CTA Red Line


CHICAGO (CBS) — Chicago Police hope surveillance pictures help lead them to one of three weekend mob attacks on people downtown.

As WBBM Newsradio’s Bernie Tafoya reports, around 10:30 p.m. Saturday, a 23-year-old man was beaten up on the CTA Red Line near the State-Lake stop Saturday by a group of about six teenagers.

The teens had just stolen the man’s 27-year-old female friend’s iPhone 4S. She had dropped the phone, and a teen had picked it up and taken it for himself.

The man told the teen to give his wife her iPhone back. But they instead began punching him in the face. The group then fled the train at State and Lake streets, near the Chicago Theatre.



Rethinking Hitler & National Socialism


I suppose it would eventually come to this: all the reading, investigating, and research I’ve done since discovering the truth about 9/11 would lead to a re-examination and re-learning of much of history, especially the mainstream version of WWI and WWII history. Since I began looking into 9/11, I’ve explored all sorts of “conspiracy theories”, but lately, largely as a result of following the work of Deanna Spingola, ZionCrimeFactory, Carolyn Yeager, Veronica Clark, and others, I’ve began to delve deeper and deeper into revisionist history and what Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) really stood for. And today I’d like to share some of my thoughts with you about this subject.

READ MORE HERE: http://mrfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2012/06/rethinking-hitler-national-socialism.html

Prothink: Everyday we see more and more people waking up to these issues and never turning back to be delusional due to the Jew again. I especially like the part that Friend pointed out about skipping those up close to you who refuse to listen and yet move on to completely new people and you’ll have success. I found this to be especially true in my own circles (or should I say outside my circles). I usually will try hard to ‘wake’ those up around me and give them plenty of time but if they never show any interest in this information then I have no time for them and have no reason to communicate/associate with them any longer. If someone cant even take to the time to look at this information then why bother with them? Keep it moving to new people, go out there and talk to anyone with an open ear. Make sure you sound confident in the information you speak of, and if you don’t know a specific detail, don’t fake it and pretend but yet tell them we could research that point and find out. People will be skeptical of this information for obvious reasons and if you have one thing wrong, their brainwashing tends to push them to think everything else you said is wrong. If you aren’t good at speaking or not a ‘people person’ than please use the video propaganda that we have in abundance here: http://www.prothink.tv/ I would even be willing to make custom master DVD of most of the videos I have hosted for people who really need them. It takes me about 1-3 hours to make a master dvd (a mster you can later make copies of) but if you are seriously trying to get the information out and lack the skills to make one you can contact me and I would be willing to help.



Orwellian Jewry’s Insane Hypocrisy on the Race Issue

Dr. David Duke exposes the insane hypocrisy of the eternal oppressors of humanity.



All Over America Government Agents of Tyranny Are Forcing Preppers Back On To The Grid

In recent years there have been huge numbers of Americans that have sought to go "off the grid" and live a more independent lifestyle. It has been estimated that there are now approximately 3 million "preppers" in the United States, and many of them just want to be left alone so that they can take care of themselves and their families on their own land. But that is not the way America works anymore.

In many areas of the country, government control freaks have essentially declared war on preppers and are attempting to force them back on to the grid. In some states, "nuisance abatement teams" are conducting armed raids on off the grid properties. Property owners are being cited for "code violations" and are being told that they are "bothering the neighbors". In some cases, trees and gardens are being forcibly removed. In other cases, entire structures are being relocated or torn down. And in the most extreme cases, property owners are actually being forced off of their properties completely by these control freaks.

You see, the truth is that in America you don't really own your property. You are essentially renting it, and you can only do with it what the government allows you to do. And the government does not like people disconnecting from the grid and living an independent lifestyle. So these battles over property rights are probably going to get even more intense in the years ahead.

These days, many Americans are choosing to grow "survival gardens" as a way to help feed their families and become more independent of the system.

But in some areas of the country these survival gardens are being forcibly ripped out by government control freaks. Just check out what happened to one unemployed woman in Tulsa, Oklahoma....

A Tulsa woman is suing the city's code enforcement officers after she said they cut down her garden with no cause. Denise Morrison said she has more than 100 plant varieties in her front and back yards and all of them are edible and have a purpose.She knows which ones will treat arthritis, which will make your food spicy, which ones keep mosquitoes away and treat bug bites, but she said none of that matter to city inspectors. 
Last August, Morrison's front and back yards were filled with flowers in bloom, lemon, stevia, garlic chives, grapes, strawberries, apple mint, spearmint, peppermint, an apple tree, walnut tree, pecan trees and much more.
The government agents left her with nothing. They ripped her garden to shreds. She was relying on that garden for her food and her medicine. Because she is unemployed, she doesn't have any money to go to the store and buy all those things.

Now she is absolutely destitute....


Minnesota Man Brutalized by SWAT Executive Officer for Talking Loud on Cell Phone (Updated)

An epidemic of police brutality and outright crazy behavior from law enforcement was illustrated once again, as an executive officer of the Minneapolis SWAT team "Superman punched" Brian Vander Lee for talking too loud on his cell phone while standing on the patio of a restaurant.

The account given by Brian Vander Lee's friend in the video below perfectly captures the disbelief when those who are sworn to protect the public become predators. An interesting background note is mentioned about the assailant, Sgt. David Clifford, in the Raw Story article about the incident:

An online biography indicated that Clifford had served with the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division as team leader of Personal Security Detachments in Kosovo and Iraq. While it would be unfair to definitively conclude that Clifford's training and experience might have desensitized him to acts of extreme violence, it is a footnote that should give pause as police throughout the country continue on a militarized path, with many local law enforcement agencies hiring those who have spent time in dangerous theaters of war.

Brian Vander Lee's family can receive benefit donations at any TCF Bank location for those who can lend their support to help cover costs for this outrageous and tragic incident that caused this father of four to spend Father's Day in intensive care.

Update: good news is being reported by MyFox9.com: Brian is responding to commands and can wiggle his fingers and toes. Meanwhile, Sgt. David Clifford has officially been charged with 3rd degree assault. Do you believe this is a fitting charge for the crime? Feel free to comment below.




This Will Usher in Collapse




Prince Charles Whines About Climate, Pushes Agenda 21


The Prince of Wales has urged world leaders to adopt a better, more integrated approach to issues like climate change.

In a pre-recorded speech to a UN sustainability conference in Brazil, he warned of the potentially 'catastrophic' consequences of inaction on issues such a climate change and global food security.

In the video address, shown to the Rio+20 High Level Dialogue on Global Sustainability, Prince Charles said: 

'I have watched in despair at how slow progress has sometimes been and how the outright, sceptical reluctance by some to engage with the critical issues of our day have often slowed that progress to a standstill.
'Already levels of CO2 have exceeded 400 parts per million; 450 parts per million is the tipping point we have to avoid so every day of delay threatens to make the change more dramatic.'
He added that scientific evidence shows the potential consequences and warned we can no longer ignore the risk. He said: 
'One thing is clear. We need to be much more informed about the actual state of the planet. We do not have nearly enough knowledge on which to base the decisions that will be the best for the long term.
'Until we do, we expose ourselves to the mounting danger of major shifts in policy that are not well conceived, but come as panicked responses to crises that could have been avoided.'
Pointing to the work of his International Sustainability Unit (ISU), a foundation set up to campaign on global sustainability, Prince Charles said a better picture of environmental problems was needed before effective policy could be implemented.


Thousands of military drones to be deployed over US mainland


A recent Department of Defense report to Congress as well as a number of media investigations have exposed government plans to deploy tens of thousands of drones over the US mainland in the coming years.

An investigative report published over the weekend by the Christian Science Monitor cited the government’s own estimates that “as many as 30,000 drones could be part of intelligence gathering and law enforcement here in the United States within the next ten years.”

Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as “drones,” are extremely sophisticated remotely-operated aircraft, developed and manufactured by the military-industrial complex in recent years at a cost of billions of dollars.

Drones vary in size from the four-pound RQ-11B Raven surveillance drone, which can be launched by hand, to the giant MQ-9 Reaper combat drone, manufactured by Northrup Grumman. The Reaper has a maximum take-off weight of 7,000 pounds, including up to 3,000 pounds of bombs, missiles and other armaments.

The infamous MQ-1 Predator drone, armed with 100-pound Hellfire missiles, is the Obama administration’s favored weapon in its illegal assassination program. A Predator drone was used in the unprecedented assassination of a US citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, in Yemen last September.

With a push of a button, thousands of pounds of high explosives can be dropped on anyone, anywhere in the world, with startling precision. Safe behind video screens at military bases within the US, military drone operators refer to their victims as “bug splats.” Thousands of innocent civilians have already been murdered in this way in Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan and elsewhere.



Queen Elizabeth Is A Bloated Parasite!

The Transylvanian witch that is perched at top the NWO hates the people of the UK and commonwealth. This blood sucking monster is a chief enemy to humanity!




Working families in UK live in financial stress


Millions of working families in Britain are living on an economic cliff-edge despite the coalition government’s claim that people who work are better off.

According to the most comprehensive study of the finances of employed households, commissioned by the ‘UK Guardian’, nearly seven million working-age adults are continuously living in financial stress to an extreme level, despite being in employment and widely independent of income support.

They stress that they are unable to cope on their current incomes and have no assets as it leaves them vulnerable to a simple expenditure like a large fuel bill.

"What's shocking about this is that these are people who want to work and are working but who, despite putting their faith in the politicians' mantra, find themselves in another cul de sac. Recent welfare cuts and policy changes make it difficult to advise these people where they should turn to get out of it: it really is genuinely shocking", said Frank Field, the Labour MP for Birkenhead.
Bruno Rost, head of Experian Public sector, mentioned that this is the new form of working class families. … "These people say that being forced to claim benefits or move into a council property would be the worst kind of social ignominy and self-failure."


Indian man chops daughters head off

Indian man 'upset with daughter sleeping around' chops off her head with a sword and parades it round village


Location: Ogad Singh's 20-year-old daughter had been living with him in the village of Dengari in Rajasthan, India, after leaving her husband two years ago

A father upset over his daughter's lifestyle chopped off her head with a sword before parading it around his village, police said. Marble miner Ogad Singh's 20-year-old daughter had been living with her parents in the village of Dengari in Rajasthan, India, after leaving her husband two years ago.

Police Superintendent, Umesh Ojha, said Singh had been upset by his daughter having affairs with men, and became enraged when she eloped with one of them two weeks ago. Singh forced her to return home yesterday and beheaded her today with a sword before surrendering to police, Ojha said.


As India modernises young people are increasingly resisting traditions like arranged marriage and limits on women venturing outside their parents' or husbands' homes, resulting in sometimes violent clashes with their parents.


The Criminal Subversion of Young Children's Minds by the Ruling Marxist Elite

Infant school praised by Ofsted ‘for allowing its transgender pupils to express themselves’

Born a boy, five-year-old Zack Avery
has lived for more than a year as girl 


Schools are labelling children as young as four as ‘transgender’ simply because they want to dress up as the opposite sex.

Little boys who like wearing dresses or tutus are being encouraged to express themselves in a ‘gender-neutral environment’ in the classroom. And while many parents may question how any school can make such a judgment about a child so young, Ofsted is apparently in no doubt.

The education watchdog lavished praise on schools where it said ‘transgender pupils are taken seriously’.

One infants’ school, catering for four to seven-year-olds, was applauded for its ‘excellent work’ with ‘pupils who are or may be transgender’.

‘The school appreciates that a boy may prefer to be known as a girl and have a girl’s name and similarly a girl may have a girl’s name but wants to dress as and be a boy,’ an Ofsted report said.
The unnamed school, where a quarter of pupils in reception class have same-sex parents or close family members in same-sex relationships, also acts as a hub for transgender pupils at other schools, hosting them at after-school clubs.

At a second school, a primary catering for children up to 11, pupils are encouraged to behave in a ‘non-gender stereotypical way’. Younger boys dress up in girls’ clothes from the dressing-up box and are allowed to wear ribbons in their hair.



Sunday, 17 June 2012

Diversity: Do we need Nig Rap and Pak Crap? Do we F**k



Saturday, 16 June 2012

Now that The Golden Dawn Party is getting a lot of backing; The Jews bring out the Evil Nazi stories.


(Reuters) - Like most others in this tiny village that lost 218 lives in a Nazi massacre in 1944, Mina Kotsiou looked on horrified as the extreme-right Golden Dawn party emerged as a surprise winner in Greece’s inconclusive election last month.

Days before a second vote, she is confident that the rest of Greece has caught on to what the central Greek village has known for 68 years – that any group fond of Nazi salutes, Aryan supremacist ideology and Adolf Hitler must only be feared.

Barely a month after Golden Dawn stormed into parliament with 7 percent of the vote, its fortunes are on the wane as stunned Greeks see its members in action: slapping a woman during a TV debate, ordering reporters to stand to attention, denying the Holocaust or smiling next to an Auschwitz oven.

“Those who voted for Golden Dawn did it out of ignorance – I don’t think they knew what they stood for,” said Kotsiou, 62, who lost two uncles in the Nazi slaughter of 1944.


“But after seeing them on television, their appearance, the way they behave, people have understood what they are about.”

Polls show support for the ultra-nationalist party – which denies it is neo-Nazi and hopes to rid Greece of immigrants – has dipped to between 3.6 and 5 percent ahead of Sunday’s vote, with some of its voters turning to the conservative New Democracy and Independent Greeks parties.


GREECE: TRYING TO UNDERSTAND SYRIZA

This article is very useful in explaining the fundamentally social-democratic character of the SYRIZA electoral bloc, which the bourgeois media are calling “far left” (and could be misinterpreted to mean “communist” or “revolutionary”), and where it stands in relationship to the Communist Party of Greece (KKE).

By Paul Mason
SYRIZA is an acronym signifying “Coalition of the Radical Left”. It’s key component is a party called Synaspismos, itself an umbrella group of the far left in Greece.
Alexis Tsipras is the 38 year old leader of the Synaspismos party, and rose to prominence as its candidate for the mayor of Athens in 2006. Tsipras originated from the youth wing of the Communist Party, the KKE.
Greek communism, like most of western communism after the 1970s, was split into two hostile parties: the KKE of the “interior” and that of the “exterior” – the latter denoting a Moscow-oriented party, the former denoting a Euro-communist, more parliamentary and socially liberal agenda.
Initially Synaspismos was the electoral alliance between the two KKEs. But in the early 1990s the main Moscow-oriented KKE quit the alliance, purging about 45% of its members, who then stayed inside Synaspismos with the Eurocommunists. These included Tsipras.
Synaspismos then evolved in an interesting direction. Reacting to the rise of the anti-globalisation movement, first of all the party itself became a highly diverse left umbrella group: of Eurocommunists, left-social Democrats, far leftists, and ecologists. It played a significant role in mobilizations against summits, beginning in Genoa 2001 and beyond. Meanwhile the main KKE remained a traditional Communist party, rooted in public sector and manual trade unions.


“Israel is Not America”—Zionist Supremacists Defend African Expulsions


The astonishing Zionist Supremacist hypocrisy on illegal immigration—where they support it for all nations except Israel—has taken on new heights with the announcement that “America is not Israel” by a leading Israeli journalist.

Writing in the Ynet news service opinion section, well-known commentator Raanan Shaked (who earlier wrote of how he supported Barack Obama) said that Israel has a “right to expel” Africans “despite unpleasant images.”

The article goes on to state that “Israel isn’t America.

“And now, when they reached the 60,000 mark, we’re waking up. We are now recalling that Israel’s statue of liberty never included the famous words: “Give me your tired, your poor…the wretched…the homeless.” No, it’s the American Statue of Liberty that makes this explicit promise,” Shaked wrote.

The hypocrisy is astonishing: the original Statue of Liberty contained no such “promise.” The statue was dedicated on October 28, 1886, a gift from France on the 100th anniversary of American independence, and had no such words attached to it.

The words to which Shaked refers are lines from a poem, “The New Colossus” by the Jewess Emma Lazarus which were only attached on a bronze plaque mounted inside the lower level of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty in 1903.

In other words, the claim that America was to welcome “the wretched refuse of your teeming shore” is a Jewish demand upon America, and not the original intention of the Statue of Liberty.

The astonishing turn of events—where Zionists now use a poem written by one of their co-religionists to claim that “Israel is not America” and thereby justify their breach of international conventions on refuges (to which they were signatories) is breathtaking.

Once again, it is one law for all Gentiles, and another law for the Jewish Supremacists.



Jewish Supremacists Attempt to Deny Genetic Basis of Judaism

The realization that scientific evidence which proves that Jews are a distinct genetically-based race instead of a “religious group” has provoked a hysterical counter-reaction by leading Zionists in Israel who have resorted to denying the reality of DNA to cover up overt Jewish racism.

One recent example, published in the Haaretz newspaper in Israel, written by Israeli university academic Dr. Samuel Lebens, said that if the claims that “Jews are a race, then Zionism is racism.

“If the Jews are a race, then parents who don’t want their children to intermarry are racists,” Dr. Lebens wrote—quite truthfully.

For that reason, he goes on to argue that Jews are “not a race,” but a “nation,” an argument which many Jewish Supremacists use to try and dodge the obvious contradiction of pretending to be “anti-racist” while at the same time supporting Jewish racial purity and the right of Israel to be a Jews-only state—with the definition of who is a Jew being determined solely by ancestry, i.e. by genetic descent.

Dr Lebens’s denials, and those of other Jewish Supremacists, have been provoked by a new book written by a Jewish professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, Harry Ostrer, called “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People.”

Dr. Ostrer claims that Jews are different, and the differences are not just skin deep. Jews exhibit, he writes, a distinctive genetic signature. Ostrer sees it as central to Jewish identity.

Geneticists have long been aware that certain diseases, from breast cancer to Tay-Sachs, disproportionately affect Jews.

Ostrer, who is also director of genetic and genomic testing at Montefiore Medical Center, goes further, maintaining that Jews are a homogeneous group with all the scientific trappings of what is called a “race.”

Because of their history of inmarriage and cultural isolation, imposed or self-selected, Jews were considered by gentiles (and usually referred to themselves) as a “race.”

Scholars from Josephus to Disraeli proudly proclaimed their membership in “the tribe.”

Ostrer divides his book into six chapters representing the various aspects of Jewishness: Looking Jewish, Founders, Genealogies, Tribes, Traits and Identity.

About 80% of Jewish males and 50% of Jewish females trace their ancestry back to the Middle East. The rest entered the “Jewish gene pool” through conversion or intermarriage. Those who did intermarry often left the faith in a generation or two, in effect pruning the Jewish genetic tree.