New Israeli study finds signs of trauma in grandchildren of Holocaust survivors
Study detects unprocessed, indirect signs of post-trauma, or problems in communication and interaction systems, among second-and-third-generation descendants of Holocaust victims.
One of the most controversial subjects in academic research on the Holocaust is the trauma's impact on future generations. A new study carried out by Haifa University argues that Holocaust trauma signs can be identified among third-generation grandchildren.
The study, carried out by Dr. Miri Scharf and Prof. Ofra Mayseless from Haifa University's Education Department, detects unprocessed, indirect signs of post-trauma, or problems in communication and interaction systems, among second-and-third-generation descendants of Holocaust victims.
This morning on the 16th April 2012, at approx 7.00am, a 2ft x 12ft NORTH WEST INFIDELS SAY BAN HALAL MEAT banner was hung by Leeds Infidels on a motorway bridge facing traffic driving in to Leeds. By 7.00am, traffic is crawling past at snail's pace and as the banner was being hung, drivers and passengers were cheering, giving the thumbs up and honking their horns. The banner was still in position at 11.00am when it was removed by the Infidels for future use.
...it has long been a given that all religions are equally superior to the Catholic Church. Now that the country has largely de-Christianized, that has expanded to the confidence that all religions are equally superior to Christianity. So, for instance, Cameron's Britain takes it for granted that Christians can not only be compelled not to wear crosses, but that if one of them becomes uppity enough to do so, all you have to do is trot out the language about mean Christians who advertise their faith as though it was superior to other beliefs. Whipped Christians, timid about appearing "judgmental", often capitulate to this sort of draconian post-Christian appeal to "judge not, lest ye be judged" and back down. However, as this video demonstrates, some Britons are beginning to get a little taste of what happens when watery post-Christian secularism, accustomed to bullying meek Christians, meets inflamed and diseased Islam:
The most telling line in that whole pathetic thing is the Muslim woman's confident declaration, "I *am* judging you."
Secularist bullies and cultured despisers--the sort of people who hector Christians to be more understanding of "Piss Christ" and who perpetually rail about Judgmental Christians--knowing that Christians are required by their faith to "judge not, lest ye be judged"--are entirely flummoxed when they encounter a religious tradition where their favorite tactic of "Bully and Scold" suddenly no longer works.
Islam has, so far as I know, no tradition against frank, naked, and proud judgment against the infidel, and no sense of shame about indulging in such judgment. Watery post-Christian secularism--which knows almost nothing of the differences between Christianity and Islam and generally assumes that if you've seen one Abrahamic religion you've seen 'em all--is gobsmacked and utterly at a loss for words in the face of Radical Islam's "Yes, I'm judging you and you're going to hell, you sl*t" contempt for the infidel.
The whole attempt by the woman in the video to appeal to a sense of shame or humility is a total failure, as is her appeal to an imaginary verse in the Q'uran about "respect for law" when it is not Sharia law. The whole thing only makes clear how immensely parasitic watery post-Christian secularism is on the Christian tradition. It has learned how to turn certain aspects of Christian morality into a weapon against the Christian faith. But it has absolutely no idea how to deal with a culture and religious tradition that holds those favorite shreds of the post-Christian morality in utter contempt.
The Islam on display in this video is a simple, straightforward and deeply fleshly religious tradition that offers frank and naked rewards to human pride with no hint of the checks placed on it by the preaching of Jesus concerning humility and the warnings he gives about judgmentalism. English secularism, being the idiot stepchild of a debased Anglican/Calvinist tradition, simply assumes that such open and frank pride is Not the Done Thing and so is utterly without antibodies when confronted with a culture that cares nothing at all for the cry of "judgmentalism".
It will be interesting to see if post-Christian England (and America) can adapt (which will mean, ultimately, a conscious reclamation of their Christian roots for some purpose other than finding sticks to beat Christians with) or if it will simply buckle in uncomprehending confusion before this arrogant and aggressive new religious ideology.
One thing I can predict with confidence: Among the first comments to a blog entry like this will be the de rigeur act of pointing out that Christians have also been guilty of the sins of pride and judgmentalism. Manning's corollary--a favorite strategy of the "all religions are alike" post-Christian crowd--states:
"In any online conversation about an incident of violence perpetrated by adherents of Islamic fundamentalism, the conversation will inevitably devolve into claims that Christians commit the same type and degree of violent acts, regardless of how demonstrably false that is; further, the claim will be made that past historical violence involving Christians means that present-day Christians are morally incapable of denouncing current violence involving Muslims"
So let me say now: Yes: Christians commit the sins of pride and judgmentalism. And the reason pride and judgmentalism is a sin and not a virtue in both Christian and post-Christian tradition is that Jesus preached humility said, "Do not judge". That, I repeat, is my point. There's a real difference between a religious tradition that condemns the sin of judgmental pride and a religious tradition that commends it. Watery post-Christian secular moralism is parasitic on the Christian moral sense and assumes it in its bullied Christian victims. But watery post-Christian secularism is utterly at sea when faced with people who could not care less about humility, the danger of passing judgement, multiculturalism and respect for diversity.
This weekend, the AP published what has to be the most slanted, biased, loaded piece of “journalism” it has ever been my displeasure to read: “Law Gives Zimmerman Extra Chances In Legal Fight”
MIAMI (AP) — George Zimmerman persuaded the police not to charge him for killing unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin, but the prosecutor has accused him of murder. Soon, armed with unparalleled legal advantages, Zimmerman will get to ask a judge to find the killing was justified, and if that doesn’t work, he’ll get to make the same case to a jury.
Only one paragraph in, and already there are numerous problems. Zimmerman “persuaded the police not to charge him”? Really? Boy, that fast-talking half-white jive artist had those racist cops right in the palm of his hand, didn’t he? Or maybe we should just simply state the truth here: Zimmerman didn’t “persuade” the police to do anything with regard to charges, because the police don’t charge detainees. State or county prosecutors do. In Zimmerman’s case, the Sanford police originally requested a manslaughter charge, but state prosecutors did not believe they had enough evidence to counter Zimmerman’s self defense claim so they declined to press charges.
Upon reexamination of the case (and, I would argue, under tremendous political pressure and fear of violence and/or reprisals by the civil rights lynch mob) the state prosecutor charged Zimmerman with second degree murder. But doggone it, that sneaky SOB managed to shield himself behind a wall of “unparalleled legal advantages.” Such as … requesting a hearing before the judge to show that the preponderance of evidence in the case points to self defense and not second degree murder. And being tried before a jury. What, these are “unparalleled legal advantages?” Maybe if you’re a graduate of the Barack Obama School of Constitutional Scholarship. But to the rest of us, they are basic Constitutional rights, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Next paragraph:
The wave of National Rifle Association-backed legislation that began seven years ago in Florida and continues to sweep the country has done more than establish citizens’ right to “stand your ground,” as supporters call the laws. It’s added second, third and even fourth chances for people who have used lethal force to avoid prosecution and conviction using the same argument, extra opportunities to keep their freedom that defendants accused of other crimes don’t get.
The NRA has nothing to do with this case, but that doesn’t stop the author from injecting an obligatory smear, while conveniently ignoring the fact that “stand your ground” and “castle” immunity laws have been strongly supported by Democrats, due to their association with domestic abuse cases and the efforts of feminists to permanently eliminate “duty to retreat” presumptions from applying to attacks in one’s own home.
Then there’s the unbelievable claim that defendants who choose to invoke SYG immunity arguments automatically get second, third, and fourth chances to avoid prosecution or conviction, that other defendants do not receive. Really? Do tell, please.
While the states that have passed “stand your ground” laws continue to model them loosely after Florida’s — Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and New Hampshire put expanded laws on the books last year — Florida is unique.
One area that sets Florida apart is the next step Zimmerman faces: With the police and prosecutor having weighed in, a judge will decide whether to dismiss the second-degree murder charge based on “stand your ground.” If Zimmerman wins that stage, prosecutors can appeal.
But in another aspect peculiar to Florida, if the appeals court sides with Zimmerman, not only will he be forever immune from facing criminal charges for shooting the 17-year-old Martin — even if new evidence or witnesses surface — he could not even be sued for civil damages by Martin’s family for wrongfully causing his death.
As Ann Althouse recently pointed out, “stand your ground” is nothing more than an immunity statute. It is not a legal defense. SYG gives the defendant the opportunity to persuade the judge, at a pretrial hearing, that the preponderance of evidence is consistent with self defense. If the judge agrees, then he can dismiss the criminal charges against the defendant (though the prosecution can still file new charges against the defendant and attempt to negotiate a plea from the defendant for a lesser charge). Again, pretrial hearings are not unusual, or unprecedented, or unparalleled. Neither are plea bargains. Nor is the application of immunity statutes to both criminal and civil cases, since the burden of proof required to find a defendant guilty in a civil suit is much less rigorous than a criminal trial.
And I certainly hope I am misreading the last paragraph I quoted, because it seems to me that the author is doing his best to disparage the concept of double jeopardy, which again is a fundamental right guaranteed to all Americans by the Fifth Amendment.
I could pull more quotes from the article, but I think everyone already understands what’s going on here. The author of this story has deliberately loaded it with opinion regarding the case, choosing words and thoughts that convey the idea that George Zimmerman is obviously guilty of murder and that he has been exploiting the system in order to get off scot-free. And the AP calls this “news.” Whatever.
So why did the AP publish this story? I believe it is a preemptive attempt to justify the standard talking points of white progressives and black civil rights agitators who routinely accuse our courts of being a “white injustice system.” And the AP is doing this because their legal writers (and probably many others on the left) know that Zimmerman was overcharged, that the evidence presented in the second degree murder charging document was thin and most likely will not survive a pretrial hearing. But liberals and civil rights agitators are in a bind, because they have all but convinced a significant segment of the population that Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
If the case against Zimmerman falls apart in court, there will be a lot of angry people in the streets demanding “justice.” The left-wing media/social justice complex will never admit that they grossly misreported the facts in this case, so they need to make certain that the mobs are angry at the judicial system and the “establishment.” And they will print even more false and misleading information in order to do this.
Disgusting. And the media wonders why fewer and fewer people trust them …
Israel’s possible military operation against Iran is a hot topic in today’s global politics. But when Iranians themselves talk about it, you could think they are speculating about a remote possibility, claiming their country is too tough for Israel.
By and large, few people in Iran actually regard a possible invasion by Israel as an imminent threat. According to the commonly accepted notion inside the country, Iran is too tough for Israel – after all, it stood its ground in an 8-year-long war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, which arguably had the entire world backing it.
Most of the world views Iran as an aggressive ‘regime’ bent on obliterating Israel. The Iranians themselves say this is a misperception stemming from Ayatollah Khomeini’s misquoted statement from 30 years back. Originally, the Imam proclaimed an unfair regime such as Israel should not exist on the world map.
“The territory where Israel is located, we do not consider it Israel. It is the same as Napoleon occupying Russia, or Hitler occupying France. Likewise, the Israelis simply invaded and occupied Palestine. We believe any territory belongs to the people who live there. And Israel was created by the British as part of their policy for sowing discord among Muslims,”
says Iran’s former Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati, International Affairs Advisor to the Supreme Leader. His is a generally accepted outlook on Israel in Iran. Velayati has authored two books on the subject.
“We are prepared to defend ourselves against any aggressor. Should Israel be crazy enough to attack Iran, there will hardly be anything left of Israel when it is over,” says Velayati. He goes on to tell me about his recent visit to the Lebanese-Palestinian border.
“I was about ten meters away from the nearest Israeli border guard,” he says. “These heights in Southern Lebanon have lots of tunnels dug out specifically for transporting various types of weapons. Back in 2006, some 5,000 to 6,000 Hezbollah fighters managed to defeat a 40,000-strong IDF force. And these days, they are even stronger than they were.”
Velayati is sure that in case of aggression from Israel, Iran will not be the only nation to strike in retaliation.
“One of the reasons behind the current pressure against Syria is Israel’s intention to destroy Hezbollah’s entrenchments. [Leader of Hezbollah] Hassan Nasrallah has confirmed that in case Israel invades Iran, Hezbollah will launch attacks across the entire territory of Israel. We are located in Israel’s backyard,” Velayati explains.
While governments have perpetuated countless hoaxes, disinformation campaigns, and false flag terrorist attacks in order to manipulate large populations of people—no plan is perhaps more grandiose than the idea of faking an appearance by God himself. There have been several times in recent history that the American government has proposed the idea of staging the appearance of God, who would then appear to speak to people and urge them to participate in an insurgency. This “supernatural” event can be done through a combination of holographic projections and sophisticated sound systems.
In February of 1999, the Washington Post reported on one of these plans, explaining that during the first Gulf War, the United States had actually considered projecting a huge holographic image of God in the sky over Baghdad.[1] This plan included the use of a 5-15 KHz acoustic beam that would make it seem like God was talking to the Iraqi people and would urge them to turn on their leader Saddam Hussein, sparking a revolution.
A similar plan was considered under Project Mongoose, a series of CIA operations against Cuba designed to overthrow Fidel Castro. Officials discussed having a submarine surface in the Havana harbor and project a huge Jesus-like figure onto the clouds that would then appear to speak and tell the Cuban people to overthrow “Godless Communism.”[2]
This technology has been called Project Blue Beam, and could be used to either stage a “supernatural” visitation from “God,” or even one from aliens arriving from outer space. In 1987, President Ronald Reagan made a very clear reference to aliens from outer space invading earth and causing all the nations of the world to unite and stop fighting each other. He actually said this at a United Nations meeting and video of the statement can be found online.
“In our obsession with antagonism of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.”[3]
Some wonder whether this comment was said as a primer for a possible use of Project Blue Beam during the Cold War in order to frighten the Russians.
(Order Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True by Mark Dice on Amazon.com, Kindle, or Nook.)
Leaders throughout history, dating back to ancient times, have claimed to have the power of God, or to speak on behalf of God in order to control their people and maintain their power and authority. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that government officials involved in covert operations would try to use Big Brother technology to take on the appearance of God himself.
“God is power [and] we are the priests of power.”[4] —Emmanuel Goldstein, the ‘bad guy’ in Nineteen Eighty-Four
[1] Washington Post “When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing” by William M. Arkin (February 1, 1999)
[2] “Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders,” An Interim Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate, November 20, 1975.
[3] Speech at the Forty-Second UN General Assembly of the United Nations (September 21, 1987)
[4] Orwell, George – Nineteen Eighty-Four page 235
This is what awaits us in the Jewish New World Order, beware!
THE RULE OF the Talmudic Jew in modern times is nearly one of an absolute monarch of a country. The Jews, through their complete domination of world finance and banking — through their malignant monopoly of the mass media of America, Britain, France, Canada and other Western powers — through their influential and vast network of subversive “lobby groups” — through their dominion over the courts and law profession in general — not to mention their pernicious presence inside the highest levels of government of the most powerful countries — have thus taken full control of the entire planet, as was foretold in ancient Jewish religious texts.
As the former Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, explained: “The Jews rule this world by proxy, they get others to fight and die for them… They have now gained control of the most powerful countries … This tiny community have become a world power.” Dr. Mahathir spoke the truth, and the reality of his words couldn’t be more clear; all one has to do is look around you and observe the terrible power of the treacherous Jews. The Jewish-Zionist terrorist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terror group Irgun Zevai Leumi) proudly proclaimed: “There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” (Jewish Daily Bulletin, July 27, 1935) The fact that the vicious crimes of this disgusting criminal’s insidious terrorist organization — such as the King David Hotel bombing and Deir Yassin Massacre — are not mentioned in Western history texts or at all covered in High School and University history classes, is a testament to the veracity of his exultant statement.
Jewish power is supremely epitomized by the fact that criticism of Christianity, Islam, or any other major religion is fully permissible in our societies, but criticism of Jews and Judaism, on the other hand, is taboo, off-limits and socially and politically dangerous. As the saying goes, if you want to know where the power lies ask whom you cannot criticize.
It’s quite interesting to note that the researchers of the “New World Order” who endeavor to deflect attention away from the Jews — such as Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, Alan Watt, Mark Dice, etc — are not silenced or suppressed, but in fact promoted by the Jewish controlled press. These purported critics of the New World Order and Illuminati who employ vague terms like “elites”/”globalists”/”the establishment”/”the military industrial complex”, and who regularly invoke a confusing deluge of elusive entities and kosher poltergeists (everything from Satanists, Occultists, Freemasons, Jesuits, Nazis, Fascists, Knights Templar, WASPs, British Royalists, Reptilians, Space Aliens, etc) are free to promote their theories and ideas on radio, television, the internet and in books, uninhibited. Their radio shows are not being cancelled, their books are not being taken off the shelves or blocked from publication, their videos are not being censored or expunged from video sharing websites, their websites and blogs are not being shut down on a whim, they are not being fined or thrown in prison for “hate speech.” On the contrary, we can find these kosher clowns being highlighted on mainstream Jewish propaganda television networks, like the History Channel, and making appearances on MSM talk shows, like The View. Critics of Jewish power, Zionism and the Jewish criminal network couldn’t even dream of achieving that level of notoriety. I wonder why?
Freemasons are often talked about by these people, but what they deliberately conceal from their audiences is the fact that the masons are subordinate and beholden to the Jews, which is admitted in the masons’ own books. On page 249 of “Duncan’s Ritual and Monitor” it states that Masonry is subservient to Judaism, noting that a recipient of the Royal Arch Degree pledges himself “For the good of Masonry, generally, but the Jewish nation in particular.” The undeniable fact that Freemasonry itself is based on the rites and rituals of the Jewish religion and the mysticism of the Jewish Cabala, is also purposefully glossed over by these deceivers.
The Protocols of Zion make clear this intention to use subservient Gentiles (shabbas goyim) as scapegoats,
“GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.” (The Protocols of Zion, 4:2)
Those of us who name Jews as the prime mover behind the New World Order — which we have dubbed the “Jew World Order” — are ruthlessly suppressed, censored, harassed, terrorized, arrested, imprisoned, and in some extreme cases even killed. There is no “Jesuit Internet Defense League” that goes around trying to censor YouTube videos that are critical of the Jesuit Order and the Vatican; but there is a “Jewish Internet Defense Force”, a predatory gang of scheming Jews who relentlessly go around sabotaging blogs and websites critical of Jews, Israel or Zionism, and who are responsible for the removal of thousands of videos as well as the banishment of thousands of YouTube channels and users of other video sharing websites.
The Vatican doesn’t have a paid army of internet trolls who roam around popular websites like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, posting comments glorifying the Vatican and smearing all critics of the Vatican as “anti-Catholic bigots”. But the Israeli government — and its vast network of Zionist lobby organizations like the World Jewish Congress, Anti-Defamation League and B’nai B’rith — has on its payroll thousands of Jew zealots called “Hasbara” roaming the net spewing pro-Zionist propaganda, attacking anyone critical of anything Jewish, Israeli or Zionist, as an “antisemite” and “fascist nazi”. It’s not Catholic Jesuits who are training their pupils to manipulate Wikipedia to favor their causes and ambitions, it’s Zionist Jews who are doing that. Doesn’t that tell you something? Only criminals attempting to evade exposure and censure would have to resort to such depraved, bottom-feeding behavior.
With one and a half million American children now homeless, reporter Hilary Andersson meets the school pupils who go hungry in the richest country on Earth. From those living in the storm drains under Las Vegas to the tent cities now springing up around the United States, Panorama finds out how the poor are surviving in America and asks whatever happened to Barack Obama's vision for the country.
Depending on whom you ask or what source you consult, writes Turse: "there are more than 1,000 US military bases dotting the globe. To be specific, the most accurate count is 1,077. Unless it's 1,088. Or, if you count differently, 1,169. Or even 1,180. Actually, the number might even be higher. Nobody knows for sure."
The middle class in America is being systematically wiped out, and most people don't even realize what is happening. Every single year, millions more Americans fall out of the middle class and become dependent on the government. The United States once had the largest and most vibrant middle class in the history of the world, but now the middle class is rapidly shrinking and government dependence is at an all-time high. So why is this happening? Well, America is becoming a poorer nation at the same time that wealth is becoming extremely concentrated at the very top. At this point, our economic system is designed to funnel as much money and power to the federal government and to the big corporations as possible. Individuals and small businesses have a really hard time thriving in this environment. To most big corporations these days, workers are viewed as financial liabilities. Most corporations want to reduce their payrolls as much as possible. You see, the truth is that most corporations want to be just like Apple. If you can believe it, Apple makes $400,000 in profit per employee.
Big corporations don't care that you need to pay the mortgage and provide for your family. Their goal is to make as much money as possible. And most of the control freaks that run our bloated federal government don't care much about middle class families either. To many politicians and federal bureaucrats, middle class families are "useless eaters" that are constantly damaging the environment with their "excessive" lifestyles. In this day and age, neither the federal government nor the big corporations really have much use for middle class Americans, and that is really, really bad news for the the future of the middle class family in America.
There are three key factors that are constantly chipping away at the middle class....
-Globalization
-Inflation
-Taxes
Labor has become a global commodity, and American workers are often 10 to 20 times as expensive as workers on the other side of the world are. Middle class jobs (such as manufacturing, etc.) have been leaving this country at an astounding pace. Competition for the jobs that remain has become extremely fierce, and this has driven wages down. The following is from a recent article in the New York Times....
But in the last two decades, something more fundamental has changed, economists say. Midwage jobs started disappearing. Particularly among Americans without college degrees, today’s new jobs are disproportionately in service occupations — at restaurants or call centers, or as hospital attendants or temporary workers — that offer fewer opportunities for reaching the middle class.
As paychecks have stagnated, the cost of living has continued to escalate. Middle class families are finding that their paychecks simply do not go nearly as far as they did before. This is creating a tremendous amount of financial stress in households all over America.
Meanwhile, our politicians are taxing the middle class like crazy. Most people only focus on federal and state income taxes, but that is only a small part of the story. As I detailed the other day, our politicians are taxing us in literally dozens of different ways and it is almost always the middle class that ends up getting hit the hardest.
Time to take on one of the ugliest questions an American worker can ask: “Do I have to work until death?” Sadly, for an increasing number of Americans, the idea of retirement at age 62 to a life rich with adventures and the once-held American dream of “Golden Years” has turned into cardboard, or worse. We’ve identified a large number of factors which are in play and a discussion of each helps to put “Working to Death” into perspective.
Mass consumption Home Improvement Loans and HELOCs.
The soaring divorce rates of recent years.
Inter-government “investment” of Social Security.
Long-term inflation by the Federal Reserve.
Soaring healthcare costs.
Serial market declines.
Pension fund bankruptcies and shortages.
Let’s address these in turn, starting with home improvement loans and HELOCs – the once darlings of the financial “services” industry standing for Home Equity Lines of Credit.
How Many Have to Die Before We Kill the False Religion of Austerity?
The rate of people taking their own lives is soaring in Europe at such a clip that the trend has given birth to a new media term: "Suicide by economic crisis."
If suicide is a measure of a society’s health, the Eurozone is getting sicker by the minute. The rate of people taking their own lives is soaring in Europe at such a clip that the trend has given birth to a new media term: "Suicide by economic crisis." How has it come to pass that people would rather die than be subjected to the pain imposed by global elites?
Before the 2007 global financial meltdown, suicides in European Union countries had fallen sharply among people under age 65. Now, thanks to misguided economic programs and the sheer greed of financiers, that trend has abruptly reversed.
The new wave of suicides tracks closely with rising unemployment. In Ireland, churches offer seminars on themes like "Suicide in Recessionary Times." Ever more draconian austerity measures that strip income and social aid act as a toxin, leaving the population so stricken that for some, dying seems the only relief.
In Greece, taking one’s own life is so deeply stigmatized by the Greek Orthodox Church that bodies are rejected for burial. Not surprisingly, suicide rates in the country have been historically low. Yet in 2011, when the joblessness rate rose from 13.9 percent to 20.9 percent, calls to a major suicide hotline more than doubled, with 5,500 people talking of ending their lives. Hotline workers report a variety of underlying issues cited by callers, but job losses and deep cuts in salary are prominent. Callers who often reveal no previous history of mental illness testify to life changes too devastating to cope with. A Greek Ministry of Health study found that the suicide rate in the first half of 2011 was 40 percent higher than the year before.
Greece now has the most rapidly increasing rate of suicide in Europe. Shocking headlines tell gruesome tales of the bankrupt and the jobless, like Apostolos Polyzonis, a 55-year-old Greek businessman who set his body ablaze outside the bank that refused to see him last September. He was eventually saved by police and shared his desperation:
"I don't feel proud about it, no way, but all these situations made me lose my self-respect and feel like I've been deprived of my rights because being able to pay your taxes is not only an obligation but also a right. People should have the possibility to pay their taxes, to pay their obligations to others, to offer the basic goods to their family so they can feel that they live with self-respect and dignity.”
More recently, the world shuddered at news of retired Greek pharmacist Dimitris Christoulas, who shot himself in central Athens near the Greek Parliament, leaving behind a note stating that the austerity measures that yanked his pension left him facing a life of rummaging through garbage pails and burdening his children.
Squeezed dry by an economic crisis they did not cause, the people of Europe are left without any means to help themselves – and to many, death seems the only alternative.
The Religion of Austerity
Across Europe, the economic philosophy of austerity has created a familiar cycle: Government spending cuts come on the heels of skyrocketing interest hikes on the debts of member countries. This means that money secured from slashes to pensions, education and medical services is funneled into higher interest payments. Meanwhile, disappearing health care and mental health services leave little room for people to rebound from economic shocks. Government officials are viewed as the cynical instruments of debt collectors and bail-out countries like Germany. The death-spiral takes over.
If you pay attention to language, you begin to notice that those who preach austerity – mainly international bankers along with the politicians they have bought and the media who serve them – often use a specifically religious language to justify the pain they are causing. Words like “cleansing,”“virtue” and “sacrifice” are common.
So Anders Behring Breivik is to have his say in court, although some of the trial will be shown on world TV, apparently the parts of the trial where Breivik speaks about the reasons and logic behind what he did, will not be broadcast and you must ask yourself what it is that the New World Order does not want the world to hear him say. His words will be published because sites like this one will see that they are.
Now before I give my views on Breivik's reasoning that caused him to go and blow up a government building, before going on to execute 3 score or more young communists attending an annual gathering at a summer camp, where they met to be indoctrinated into "socialist" politics and make contacts for the future when they would be the new leaders of Norway, let me say this.
I understand completely why Breivik has refused to recognise the court, I feel the same way about the Queen, government and our courts. I recognise that they have "power" over me but I do not accept that they have any moral authority or legal authority over me, having given up the right to expect my loyalty and acceptance of their laws when they betrayed the British People. I say it publicly now - I want the traitors brought to book and executed and I will do all in my power to see that that happens.
So then why did Breivik do it? Well it's easy to see by looking at any video footage of a major city or reading any daily newspaper in any Western Civilised County, that the global marxists have flooded the white homelands with the dross of the world, in order to bring about the genocide of the white race.
From the fact, that the colonisation of the civilised white world is taking place simultaneously across the globe should be evidence enough that this is all part of the big plan and a plan that was clear to Breivik also, who is by all accounts a very intelligent person.
So Breivik sees what you see, what I see, he reads what you read and he reads what I read and he discovers the truth and looks for a way forward. He probably reaches the same conclusion that I and many of you have come to. We will get nowhere going down the democratic path - our enemies are using democracy to destroy our way of life first and then us. (Democracy will be the death of us).
Now I must choose my words with care. As you know, this site was requested to provide information to the Norwegian Police and you will have read my truthful response in which I stated, that I did not hold Breivik solely responsible but also felt that the real people responsible for his actions, were the people forcing an unwanted multiculturalism on the world - they are the ones who made the bullets for Breivik to fire. They are the real guilty ones in this tragedy.
So Breivik knows what we know and then this is where he and I probably diverge in our thought processes. He decides that the best way to draw the worlds attention to the planned genocide of the white race, is by an act so violent that the entire world will stop, look at him and ask him - Why?
And then when asked that simple question, Breivik will then (in his mind) justify himself by saying to the world everything that you and I know to be true whilst sending a message to the "elite" that neither they, nor their children or those employed by the occupying government are safe any more if they continue with their acts of evil against the people of the civilised world.
A secondary reason for his actions may have been that Breivik reasoned that by executing the 77 young marxists, that he was depriving the enemies of the free world of future leaders in Norway, the country that he loves - who knows what positions or acts of evil those young communists might have gone on to achieve or do? We shall never know.
Now then we turn to Breivik's involvement with the Knights Templar, who are dedicated to halting the spread of Islam - that secret organisation, according to the prosecution does not exist. Well clearly it does or did exist because Breivik was a member and we can see what one member of an anti-globalist world can do, when we look at the image you see below of the government building that Breivik blew up before going on to execute the marxists on Utoya Island.
Well looking at that kind of damage and forgetting for one moment the loss of life alone, the costs to repairing or rebuilding the government offices are going to be enormous and if there is one thing the money motivated "elites" hate doing, it is spending money.
Loss of life they can handle but their accountants will not tolerate "unnecessary" expenditure and if more and more government buildings start to tumble because of the actions of people like Breivik then you can bet they would soon reconsider their options.
I regret to tell you this but there are real bad times coming and incidents like those in Norway are going to become all more common, either committed by the spreading cancer of Islam or by the reactions to the colonisation of their countries by people like Anders Breivik.
As tornadoes complete their march through America’s heartland, and earthquakes rattle the planet, questions as to the nature of these events are being raised anew, particularly among those aware of the capabilities of HAARP technology. Indeed, the more one understands about the levels of technological development achieved in the upper reaches of government and elitist corporations, the more one is forced to question what previously could be taken for granted as a natural occurrence.
Nevertheless, the very concept of man-made weather is simply too much for many stuck in mainstream tunnel vision to grasp. Admittedly, those of us not actually involved in the project, as a result of overwhelming secrecy and blatant refusal to divulge any real information on the HAARP system, are left to much speculation.
Some individuals may claim that HAARP is incapable of producing large-scale events. Others, however, find a way to blame virtually every natural disaster on the technology. In the end, the truth likely sits somewhere in between.
Regardless, there are individuals who have done amazing amounts of good research regarding HAARP with very little resources at their disposal. Obviously, these researchers have developed their own terminology and designation for the anomalies surrounding weather and HAARP events.
Specifically, terms like “Scalar Squares,” “HAARP Rings,” and “Stairstep Patterns” have become accepted nomenclature for many who follow the HAARP system and its effects on weather patterns and the environment.
These terms have become highly used in HAARP-related videos on YouTube and, unfortunately, are the subject of much ridicule by those still ignorant of scientific advancements. More often than not, the very concept of using these types of “patterns,” or even the technology itself, is rejected as tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theory.
However, the folks at Sincedutch have produced a paper published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters by researchers working on a grant presented to Stanford University by the Office of Naval Research regarding the efficacy of a new type of ELF/VLF wave generation. This new method of wave generation – using HAARP itself – is called “geometric modulation” due to the use of geometric patterns for wave generation.
Are you kidding me? This is too weird to pass up. Is this idiotic tribute to confusion waltzing towards the gladiator’s arena of human sacrifice or what? What the hell is this thing?
No one in their right mind would approve of a multi-million pound tribute to insanity in their back yard, never mind in their country. This twisted, fiendish message from hell is about as uplifting to humanity as a blender is to a vegetable. At least a veggie gives life…this is spiritually deadly.
It’s ridiculous. But like all Illuminist symbolism and ritual, it’s dead serious. And centrally placed on the world stage for all to assimilate. If this is news to you, here’s what I’m referring to in Wikipedia propaganda:
The ArcelorMittal Orbit is a 115 metres (377 ft) high observation tower in the Olympic Park in Stratford, London. The steel sculpture is Britain’s largest piece of public art, and is a permanent, lasting legacy of London’s hosting of the 2012 Summer Olympics, assisting in the post-Olympics regeneration of the Stratford area. Sited between the Olympic Stadiumand the Aquatics Centre, allows visitors to view the whole Olympic Park from two observation platforms.
Yes, this thing is real. Real big, real ugly and with real intent.
Behold Your Future DNA or What?
What’s the fricking message here? We’re gonna twist your DNA to shreds? Twirl and spin your outlook till wrong looks right? Defy normal and natural order to create a world of structural, chemical and ethical insanity?
This is like a transhumanist shape gets stuck inside Jeff Goldblum’s human fly machine. It looks like a mangled serpentine Caduceus or Ouroboros consuming itself.
Global warming alarmists debunked yet again by reality
Even as climate alarmists amplify their call for a worldwide tax on carbon dioxide emissions in the name of preventing global warming – penguins, polar bears, Himalayan glaciers and Arctic sea ice are all thriving.
With dire proclamations of ice free Arctic summers vehemently debunked, the latest data indicates that both wildlife and the environment in earth’s coldest regions has not experienced the catastrophic devastation predicted as a result of man-made climate change.
Forecasts that Canada’s polar bear population would significantly decline due to global warming have been proven completely inaccurate. The latest study shows that the Hudson Bay area polar bear population has remained steady at around 1000 – the same number found by a 2004 study, confounding the “doom-and-gloom” predictions of environmentalists about the demise of the polar bear (which) have failed to come true,”reports the Canadian Press.
“We are not observing these impacts right at this moment in time. And it is not a crisis situation as a lot of people would like the world to believe it is,” said Drikus Gissing, Nunavut’s director of wildlife management.
Meanwhile, “A new study using satellite mapping technology reveals there are twice as many emperor penguins in Antarctica than previously thought,” reports Live Science.
Using state of the art technology that can single out penguins from other birds, researchers counted almost 600,000 penguins around the coastal regions, almost double the previous estimate of 270,000-350,000.
But it’s not just wildlife that is contradicting the claims of climate change alarmists, the environment itself is not behaving as global warming data models predicted.
Satellite data produced by French researchers shows that glaciers in the western Himalayan region are “putting on mass” rather than melting completely as doomsayers had warned in a 2007 UN IPCC report, which claimed that most of the region would be ice free by 2035.
Despite the findings,BBC News, an ardent promoter of climate change propaganda, blamed the thickening of the glaciers on man-made global warming. When the earth last showed similar activity back in the 1970′s, the same scientific establishment which now pushes anthropogenic global warming blamed the changes on global cooling.
Home secretary to tell MPs she will not appeal against European court of human rights ruling blocking cleric's deportation
The government will not appeal against the controversial European court of human rights ruling blocking the deportation of the radical Islamist cleric Abu Qatada, the home secretary is to tell MPs this afternoon.
Instead, Theresa May will attempt to convince a British high court judge that she has made sufficient "demonstrable progress" in securing assurances from the Jordanian government about Qatada's treatment to prevent him being freed from virtual house arrest.
The announcement is expected to lead to Qatada's lawyers making an application to the special immigration appeals commission for the highly restrictive bail conditions on the terror suspect to be lifted.
May's Commons statement comes after the deadline for lodging an appeal to the Strasbourg court passed at midnight on Monday. May is trying to secure assurances from the Jordanians that Qatada will not face a trial on his return based on evidence obtained by torture, but has yet to reach a final agreement.
A lesbian police community support officer known to friends as 'Lisa Filth' has been jailed for passing on confidential information to other gay people in her area.
In the worst data breach Lisa Stapley, 39, who was recruited by North Wales Police because she is gay, tipped off a lesbian friend wanted for assault with a text saying: 'Get out of Wrexham, the police are looking for you.'
Jailing her for ten months at Mold Crown Court, Judge Philip Hughes said that she had breached trust after she admitted four charges of misconduct in public office.
The worse incident was when, within five minutes of an assault complaint being made, Stapley sent a string of text messages to a friend telling her to get out of town.
Osborne agrees to hand IMF another £10billion of our cash amid eurozone crisis
George Osborne is expected to plough another £10billion into the International Monetary Fund to help increase its resources, it emerged today. The UK has already pledged £29.5bn to the Fund, £5.5bn of which has gone into the eurozone rescue scheme. But it is thought the Chancellor will agree to add more money to help the IMF go from $400bn (£250bn) to around $1trillion.
The Government is able to commit the extra £10bn without a vote in Parliament but Mr Osborne said the UK will only dish out the extra cash if there were 'no new vehicles or funds specific to the eurozone'.
He also said there would be no deal unless all major non-eurozone countries signed up to give more.
All bar the U.S. after Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, said the U.S. would not pledge any more money until the eurozone added sufficient funds to its bail-out scheme. It was a blow to IMF managing director Christine Lagarde who told The Telegraph last week that she was 'hopeful we will make progress' this week.
The relentless encroachment of socialism upon America’s economic, cultural and governmental landscape is like a bad dream to most red-blooded Americans. When society changes it can seem like the ineluctable drift of evolution or chance. But in the case of America’s ongoing continued expansion of government powers, spiking taxes, and shrinking military, it’s all part of a planned elitist push into socialism. And one need not believe in secret conspiracies when contemplating this shift. In fact, for those paying attention, it was all outlined long ago by the Fabian Socialist society, and other groups such as the Frankfurt School, as explained below.
1. Basic Socialism: History & Dogma
Socialism is a European phenomenon, beginning after the French Revolution with writers from Paris and London forming the core. The definition of socialism is: “a centrally planned economy in which the government controls all means of production.” While most believe Karl Marx (1818-1883) was the father of socialism, he wrote very few specifics on the topic. In fact, one of Marx’s most signal shortcoming was his failure to describe his own working economic system. Instead, it was Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924), first leader of the new USSR who developed the theory in situ, according to the Library of Economics & Liberty. Lenin’s attempts at creating a profit-free economy was a spectacular failure, only bettered by Joseph Stalin’s larger failure.
A. Vladimir Lenin’s ad hoc Socialism
The Library lists Vlad’s four critical factors he believed necessary for economic success:
Lenin began from the long-standing delusion that economic organization would become less complex once the profit drive and the market mechanism had been dispensed with—“as self-evident,” he wrote, as “the extraordinarily simple operations of watching, recording, and issuing receipts, within the reach of anybody who can read and write and knows the first four rules of arithmetic.”
The four laws were apparently insufficient to drive en economy towards productivity:
In fact, Soviet economic life under these first four rules was so disheveled within four years of the 1917 revolution, productivity fell to 14% of its pre-revolutionary level. By 1921 Lenin was forced to institute the New Economic Policy (NEP), a partial return to the market incentives of capitalism. This brief mixture of socialism and capitalism ended in 1927 after Stalin instituted forced collectivization meant to mobilize Russian resources for its leap into industrial power.
Suffice it to say that no version of socialism has ever provided longterm economic growth or security anywhere in the world, because it lacks a cohesive economic theory.
B. Karl Marx’s Vision: Revolution
Karl Marx claimed to have discovered a “science” of economics that proved his ideas true. In fact, according to author Paul Johnson in Intellectuals, Marx was a moralizing journalist, with the faculty of a poet, masquerading as a science-minded intellectual. Writes Johnson:
But in a deeper sense he was not really a scholar and not a scientist at all. He was not interested in finding the truth but in proclaiming it. There were three strands in Marx: the poet, the journalist and the moralist. Each was important. Together, and in combination with his enormous will, they made him a formidable writer and seer. But there was nothing scientific about him; indeed, in all that matters he was anti-scientific.
Further, according to Marx’s writing partner, lifelong benefactor and friend, Frederick Engels, Marx should be remembered as a revolutionary. He said grave-side at Marx’s burial:
For Marx was before all else a revolutionist. His real mission in life was to contribute, in one way or another, to the overthrow of capitalist society and of the state institutions which it had brought into being…
So Marx’s main interest in writing was to foment revolution, because without the collapse of capitalism, the promised paradise of total government control would never have room to occur. Knowing this, American leftists have long done whatever they could, in small and large ways to help birth the revolution upon American soil. The following is a partial history of that struggle.
2. Congressional Record January 10, 1963
On January 10, 1963, Florida US Representative Albert Sydney Herlong, Jr gave a speech outlining what he believed to be the 45 methods communists were using to take over America. Ponder the staggering number of these goals already achieved, much to our mortal damage.
11. Promote the U.N. As the only hope for mankind.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Control schools. Use them to transmit socialist & Marxist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Infiltrate teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Discredit American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression.
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. Promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate churches. Replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit Bible & emphasize need for intellectual maturity, rejecting a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit US Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle American culture & discourage teaching of American history because it’s only part of the “big picture.”
32. Support any socialist movement to centralize control over any part of the culture: education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
3. Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School were a group of German intellectual Marxists who established the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University, modeled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. This became known as the “Frankfurt School.” After Hitler came to power, these Marxist professors fled to the West to preserve their lives. Setting up shop in Columbia University, they decided to launch a mission to convert America to Marxism via a soft war. According to one source they did certain things to aid this:
To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the Frankfurt School recommended (among other things):
The creation of racism offences.
Continual change to create confusion
The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
Huge immigration to destroy identity.
The promotion of excessive drinking
Emptying of churches
An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
Dependency on the state or state benefits
Control and dumbing down of media
Encouraging the breakdown of the family
A main idea of the Frankfurt School was exploiting Freud’s ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
Attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children. Abolish differences in the education of boys and girls. Abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’
4. Fabian Society: Slow Conquering Socialism
The Fabian Society of Britain was named after Roman general Fabius Maximus, famed for a warfare style that eked out victories via patience and attrition. Fabian socialists likewise seek to take over their host countries by slowly changing standards until the dumbed-down populace no longer has the wit to notice or care. A sociological analogy might be—how predators groom their victims, often waiting years for a chance to exploit their prey. An author sums up their strategy:
Like their namesake, today’s Fabians avoid open confrontation with the forces of freedom and, subsequently, tend to shield their true agenda from the light of day.
The creed of the Society, written in 1887, was as follows:
“It (The Fabian Society) therefore aims at the reorganization of society by the emancipation of land and industrial Capital from individual and class ownership…The Society accordingly works for the extinction of private property in land.”
The Fabian plan was to infiltrate America by targeting our legal system. Fabian convert Felix Cohen, a law professor at Yale, wrote the following:
“It is possible to attempt the overthrow of capitalism as an economic system without at the same time attacking the substance of capitalist law…Socialists can learn from their adversaries that it is always possible to attack existing law, in the name of democracy, justice, and liberty, in the name of the great ideals of the American Constitution, and in the name of law itself.”
Fabians sought to overthrow our system by changing the meaning of our stated legal concepts, and to codify those changes with cases brought by Fabian lawyers before Fabian Judges. The effect of this has been that while the technical wording of American law hasn’t changed much, the implementation has been transferred from the citizen and his elected representatives, to appointed bureaucrats. The Fabians have, diabolically, used our own laws to change the law. Freedom is the victim of these Socialist manipulations.
Conclusion
America is infiltrated by Marxists active so long in undermining our institutions and ideals that socialism is now in our collective DNA. They seek an end to private property, representative democracy and rule of law. But once America has turned over leadership to committed liberals, who will be left to protect the world from takeover by globalists intent on universal tyranny? Unfortunately, the question answers itself.