The 14 Words

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

If The Nazis [Had] Won

IF NATIONAL SOCIALISM HAD TRIUMPHED THIS IS HOW LIFE COULD BE:


INSTEAD WE HAVE THIS...


AND THIS...


AND THIS ...


AND THIS ...


OR WILL IT EVENTUALLY COME TO THIS ...


National Socialism is the only ideology that can save our people and our race. Our forefathers fought for the wrong side against their own race, their own kinsmen, they fought for the Jewish Bankers, Globalists and International Capitalism that with the failure of the Zionists first venture Communism. Morphed into what we have now Fascism, The New World Order. Although they did not realise this at the time as just like we are lied to now by the MSM they were lied to then (And of course their was no 'Alternative Media' via the Internet available)

This is why as a race we are in the terrible position we are in now. You people who are against the principle of National Socialism do not really understand what it is. And let me ask you this: If Hitler had won WWII would things be any worse than they are now? Think about it! National Socialism explained: http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/nation...


John Hardon

Jewish Reign of Terror Against Humanity


Read: Persecution or Prosecution? Jewish Tyranny and Anti-Semitism Through the Ages by Victor Wolzek

Britain spying on its own citizens

N.I.: Priest’s PC Autoplays Gay Porn Slideshow to Congregation

Father Martin McVeigh was giving a talk to 26 parents and one 8-year-old kid when computer disaster struck. He connected his USB drive into a PC to start his Powerpoint presentation and, instead of the word of God, a hardcore gay porn slideshow started—thanks to Windows' autoplay.

Some parents—who were there to hear McVeigh talk about First Communion—were angry. Others were in shock. Just like McVeigh. He was so embarrassed that, according to witnesses, unplugged the USB drive and walked out of the room without uttering a single word. Later he declared to the press:

"I don't know how it happened but I know what happened. There are people making innuendoes who weren't even there but in this day and age these stories grow."
Well, Father, I think there's little space for innuendo after showing gay porn in church. McVeigh, however, claims there is an explanation for all this.

The Archdiocese of Armagh, where the parish belongs, called the police and gave them the USB stick for inspection. The police told them there was no crime in gay porn and the drive didn't contain any pedophilia. It was just normal gay porn.

According to The Ulster Herald, "an emergency meeting was held in the parish last night." You know, because gay priests are such a rare event that emergency meetings need to be held with the utmost urgency, so everyone can slam someone who mistakenly made his sexual preferences public. Embarrassment is not enough! To the fire with him.

Father McVeigh. Source: BBC [Ulster Herald via Irish Central, Joe.ie]


How to avoid these embarrassing situations

This is a good reminder for anyone who has porn in their computers or USB drives and is giving presentations: people, turn off the autoplay feature in your Windows computer. Just go to your Start button, click on Control Panel, click on Hardware and Sound, and then click on AutoPlay. There you will be able to turn it on or off for each media type.


You should do the same with the address autocomplete feature in your browser—which will populate your address bar with your latest YouPorn antics if you forgot to use anonymous browsing. Since you you are it, turn off the most visited sites front page in your web browser too. The locations of these preferences will change depending on your preferred browser, but they should be easy to find.

And never, ever leave your screensaver pointed to a folder which may contain porn, as the screensaver may fire up during your presentation.

One last thing: if you have OS X Lion, remember its new application document handling: when you open an app, OS X will automatically open whatever documents were opened the last time it was running. Like a reader pointed out, this may lead to some embarrassing situations. Always close any potentially embarrassing documents before closing the app itself.


Woman Or Machine? Sophisticated Japanese She-Bot Blurs The Line

Perhaps the NWO are planning to eventually kill off all humans except for the privileged few, the 'elite, the Satanic Controllers and replace unnecessary consumers of food etc with Robots? Hmmm just a thought. J.H. 


At Hong Kong's "Robots in Motion 2012" Expo, one of the world's most sophisticated (and beautiful) robots came to life


By Kate Springer

Imagine a world where robots conduct traffic, work in factories, make sushi and vacuum office floors. It may not be far away. In Japan, robots are already common fixtures, and the latest prototypes come ever closer to the line separating man from machine. This week, during her first visit to Hong Kong, female android Geminoid F chatted, sang and smiled while an awestruck crowd snapped photos. Her creator, Japanese robotics guru Hiroshi Ishiguro, programmed her built-in computer with 65 behaviors, making her one of the world’s most intelligent robots.

Ishiguro last made international headlines in 2006 when he made an android replica of himself, the Geminoid HI-1. For his pioneering work, CNN named him one of eight “geniuses who will change your life,” and the BBC chronicled his story in the 2008 documentary Man-Machine. Ishiguro says his new robot F, as he’s named her, is more elegant and approachable than his past creations.

(MORE: New Sprinting Humanoid Robot Will One Day Come with Flexible Arms and Tactile Skin)

The biggest difference between Ishiguro’s copy of himself and F are the number of actuators, or motor-like mechanisms, that control behaviors. Geminoid HI-1 boasts about 50, while F has only 12. This has dropped the cost from more than $1 million to $110,000, which Ishiguro hopes will help popularize the product. Scientists were able to simulate human-like behaviors using electronic signals in the robot’s built-in computer. The robotic twin can smile, frown and furrow her eyebrows, but most of the time the silicone-skinned clone just looks a little dazed.

(MORE: Gas-Attendant Robot Takes First Step Toward Refueling Satellites in Space)

F is already hard at work. She had a brief acting stint last year when she performed onstage at the Tokyo Art Festival, and she recently modeled clothes as part of a Tokyo department-store window display. Of course, it’s impossible to predict how people will use robots as they become more mainstream, but Ishiguro says the practical applications of F are endless. She could be used as a mannequin, a substitute teacher or a hostess. “We can’t predict all of the ways people will use the robots,” Ishiguro says. “We give the technology, but we don’t control the application.”

(VIDEO: Should We Fear the Robots?)

Will robots ultimately become our friends — or even intimate companions? Ishiguro is betting on it. He says that with the right technology, he can build androids that think, act and react like people. “What is a human?” he asks. “Please define, and we will make a copy.”

MORE: The Robot That Moves like a Jellyfish and Runs on Water



Will U.S. Troops Fire On American Citizens?


Who would believe that in the year 2012 one would have to ask if the U.S. Military would fire on American Citizen’s?

The question of troop involvement in a possible upcoming Martial Law scenario that is being predicted is no imaginary possibility – nor is it a ‘conspiracy theory’.

Other tough questions are being discussed such as, “Will the U.S. government confiscate Gold and Silver in an economic collapse?” and “Will there be a round-up of American Citizens to be put into FEMA Camps?”

Many believe that the United Nations will be given authority to step in to keep the peace in any civil unrest or economic collapse. This is a strong possibility. Readers should be familiar with the term ‘Hidden In Plain Sight’. How this applies to the United Nations is simple.

The United Nations main purpose is to be the centerpiece of the coming World Government that will control nearly of aspect of the global population. For years their military strength has grow as they are now increasingly tasked with upholding law and order in conflicts around the world.

Research into the U.N and prove to yourself that this is or isn’t the case. The U.N. is the governing body of The New World Order – Hidden In Plain Sight.


Fortune Favors Just The Brave

The Call Of The Aryan Spirit


Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live. - Adolf Hitler

How to hide emails from government snooping

By Jack Schofield, The Guardian


Despite coalition proposals to monitor public email, there remain numerous free or low-cost methods to keep messages private

You already know how to keep messages private: you just encrypt the contents using a password. But although this kind of technology has been freely available to PC users since Phil Zimmermann launched PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) in 1991, hardly anyone uses it. The benefits of email and online messaging are that they are fast and relatively frictionless – you don’t need to address an envelope, find a stamp, walk to a post box and so on – and encryption becomes an annoyance.

The problem with the latest government attempts at snooping is that they are not concerned with the content of messages, but their existence. If you have found some suspected criminals or terrorists, then you will want to know who their friends are: the people they email or message most frequently. Each of these people can probably be identified by their internet protocol (IP) address: the number assigned by their ISP (internet service provider). Even an encrypted email will usually include the addresses of the sender and the recipient in its headers.


The general solution to privacy concerns is to use a non-UK “proxy server” to relay web pages, messages, anonymous email accounts and other content anonymously. Hackers who really want to hide their origins will use several proxy servers, including ones that are acting as proxies without their owner’s knowledge. Many websites publish lists of free proxy servers, which are updated continuously.

Of course, these servers may offer less privacy than your ISP, and some may be traps or “honeypots”. However, there are some trusted anonymous servers available either free or for modest payments.


Examples include hidemyass.com, anonymouse.org, Guardster, Proxify, IDzap and Megaproxy. Such servers usually have terms of service to prevent abusive or criminal behaviour. They will probably record your IP address and may report you if you breach them, so they’re not completely beyond government reach. However, they’re probably beyond government fishing expeditions.

There are also some really anonymous remailer services, which use networks such as Cypherpunk and Mixmaster to ensure privacy. The drawback is that if you send an email anonymously, the recipient cannot simply hit Reply. QuickSilver software for 32-bit Microsoft Windows makes it relatively simple to route an email through 45 or more remailers using Mixmaster. But like the Tor anonymous network, this kind of thing is mostly used by programmers and geeks.

There are simpler ways to send private and/or anonymous emails. For example, anonymouse.org offers a simple form for AnonEmail, as does the sendanonymousemail.net website. There’s also Mailinator, which provides free disposable email addresses, and Hushmail, which works like an ordinary email service but encrypts all your email.

For encrypted instant messaging, you could try BitWiseIM or ProjectSCIM (for Secure Cryptographic Instant Messenger). Facebook’s internal messaging is reasonably private because it’s not visible on the net, though it could be vulnerable to a court order.


In the end, the simplest way to increase your privacy and security is to restrict your internet use to sites and services that have SSL connections. These are already standard for banks and shopping sites, and are increasingly used for email and other purposes. You can recognise them by the s for secure in their https: addresses, and a padlock visible in the browser. The next step is to use the InPrivate, Incognito or Private Browsing feature of your web browser to use anonymous online services.

However, it’s worth trying proxy servers and services, if only to provide a nice illustration of the law of unintended consequences. In other words, government attempts to snoop can help to create an internet culture where snooping becomes impossible.


Freemasons - BBC Continues Recruiting - What Is Really Going On?

BBC Continues Recruitment Campaign for the Freemasons - What is Really Going on Inside the Brotherhood?


Nigel Brown: "Welcome, come on in. This is an instruction on how to become a Freemason. We’d like to thank BBC for providing us with a platform on their website on how to join, with links and all!"

BBC ran a story March 8th 2012 called: Would you want to be a Freemason?. BBC is now continuing their recruitment campaign on behalf of the Secretive brotherhood.

This is from BBC (emphasis mine):

The Freemasons, an international organisation often shrouded in mystery, is undergoing a rebrand. But what is this society and what exactly do Freemasons do?
Conspiracy theories and controversy have dogged the Freemasons throughout their existence, fuelled by their secretive image, but for some they are just a gentleman’s club devoted to charitable giving.
 
Nigel Brown, grand secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England has answered a selection of readers’ questions.
...
Ana Milena Gongora in Colombia writes: Which conspiracy theory do Freemasons feel most annoyed about or consider the most awkward?
Nigel Brown: All conspiracy theories annoy us as they are just that - conspiracy with no truth or grounding. Part of the reason for our current activity is to dispel all the myths and conspiracy theories attached to Freemasonry.
Read the rest of the VERY short Q & A on BBC’s website: here.

I’m not going to claim that every single Freemason in whole world is plotting against the rest of humanity to subjugate them and the rest of the world under their control, as some people claim ...but I can’t say this is not the case either. I simply don’t know for a fact. But to suggest, as the grand secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) Nigel Brown does, that there are NO CONSPIRACIES involving Freemasons is absolutely ridiculous!

Listen to an excerpt from our interview with Freemason Christopher Knight about The Secret Agenda of High Level Freemasonry for a chilling account of what is going on that the highest level of the Scottish Rite.

There are many documented cases of how men within the secret society have benefited in different situations just because they were Freemasons. They have been helped, aided, protected and promoted by other Freemasons just becase they belong to the same lodge or the same brotherhood. Favoritism and nepotism is everywhere, to suggest that Freemasonry is exempt from this is just stupid! We refer you to the book "Inside the Brotherhood" by Martin Short. We’ve also linked up the six part documentary with the same name below. Please take the time to watch it.

Even if the initial purpose of the order was founded on "nobel" principles (which can and should be argued) intergroup bias will creep into ANY organization eventually, simply due to human nature and human psychology.

The position that Freemasonry makes already "excellent" men better, raising them to an above-human saint-like level, is nothing I buy either.

A secret society like the Freemasonic order is potentially a perfect breading ground for wicked men who can infiltrate the order and use the secretive underground code-of-silence quality of the order for their own purposes. Due to the secrecy, men can and will be protected by other masons. Their position in the masonic rank is also important due to the fact that the can fraternize or network with other people in positions of power.

Either Nigel Brown is lying or he is totally disconnected from reality. ALL groups, parties, organization, associations and societies are subject to infiltration and corruption. As long as there is an unwillingness by UGLE, other chapters or lodges to recognize this fact, people will continue to point fingers at them ...and rightly so! This attitude is what leads to suspicion, especially when Nigel Brown makes such a childish dismissal of the claims of conspiracy.

Because the secretive nature of Freemasonry, questions will continued to be raised. When people in high places, in politics, business and royalty are members people should ask these questions.

As we know - it doesn’t matter what people say, but what they do.

It’s said that there are around 6 million Freemasons in the world, that’s like a small nation. So let’s put this in perspective. HOW can Nigel Brown speak for all Freemasons or even claim to know the quality of all these men? That’s like saying that there are no bad men, criminals or conspiracies occurring in Bulgaria, just because their Prime Minister Boyko Borisov said so!?

Inside the Brotherhood



Also see our two part episode (6 hours) with Michael Tsarion on The Brotherhood of Death:
Part One - Masonry & Judaism
Part Two - Antiquity & Knights Templar

What does this symbol mean?


By Henrik Palmgren

WHITE GUILT LIBERALS

Trayvon Martin Supporters trashing a store in Miami!

Ape Teens Beat White Man Almost Dead with Hammer


Suspects Julius Bender, and Yahaziel Israel. Do either look like they could be Obama’s sons? These photos of the black perps were removed from Orlando Sentinel site after pro-Whites at CofCC wrote about crime! [INCOG]

From Council of Concerned Citizens

UPDATE: We have confirmed that the victim is white. A CofCC.org reader received an e-mail reply from the Orlando Sentinel admitting that the race of the victim was censored on purpose, and that it is the policy of the newspaper to censor race. Also, shortly after CofCC.org wrote about this crime, the Orlando Sentinel removed the perpetrators’ mug shots from their online article. The Orlando Sentinel censored the race of the perpetrators in a previous article, even though they were still at large when it was published.

A fifty year old white old man is on life support after a near fatal beating. Police have arrested two black teens. The attack occurred near the community where the Trayvon Martin self-defense shooting took place.

The two suspects face charges of attempted first-degree murder, burglary with assault or battery and armed burglary. They are accused of beating the man in the head with a hammer. The suspects are 18 and 19.



The attack took place in Midway, FL, about six miles from where George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in self-defense.

Think this story will receive 1/1,000th of 1% of the news coverage that Trayvon Martin received? [People magazine on right]

Even though the police put the race of the victim in the incident report, the media censored this information. A reporter for the Orlando Sentinel confirmed that the race of the victim was omitted on purpose. The Orlando Sentinel also appears to have removed the suspects’ mug shots shortly after CofCC.org wrote about the attack.

Read More from the Orlando Sentinel


Previously the Orlando Sentinel had published a request for the public to help catch the perpetrators. The description is based from two eyewitnesses. What MAJOR feature is missing from the description published by the newspaper?

From Orlando Sentinel…

Both of the attackers are about 20 years old. One is 5 feet, 8 inches tall and was wearing blue denim shorts. He was not wearing a shirt. The second man was 5 feet, 10 inches tall.



White guy wanders into black neighborhood, gets beaten and stripped nearly naked. Videotaped by the animals, laughing away. Note the women taking part.

Treacherous Treaties: American Imperialism, World Government and the Bilderbergers

by Prof. John Kozy

Is American imperialism a Bilderberger plot? Are the American bankers, diplomats, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations all traitors, having turned America into merely an instrument to carry out their Bilderberger maniacal aims? Does America as a sovereign nation even exist anymore?

Consider the possibility that the Bilderbergers have already bought off the governments of Western Europe, North America, and the remnants of the British Empire that still cling to the Queen's skirts. If that be true, the only remaining obstacles to a Bilderberger success are the BRICS and the Moslem world. The WTO and promises of free trade and pie in the sky prosperity can be used to subvert the BRICS which leaves the Moslem countries as the last bulwark in defense of free, independent, and sovereign nations. When one realizes just how ironic that is, the realization of just how far the Bilderbergers have already come in advancing their agenda really strikes home.


Sometime during the First World War, the well-meaning but naïve American president, Woodrow Wilson, came up with the idea that every ethnic minority in Eastern Europe was entitled to its own nation, a nation for every ethnicity, and he persuaded the victorious powers to create such nations while writing the peace treaties that ended the war. It was a bad idea.

Before the war, central and Eastern Europe was dominated by Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and Russia. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was comprised of more than a dozen ethnic groups. There were Germans (i.e., Austrians), Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Ukrainians, Serbs, Croats, Slavs, Romanians, and more.

When the war ended, several treaties were imposed on the defeated nations, all of which had to give up territory to the victorious powers and a number of newly created nations (Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Czechoslovakia). Several nations were enlarged (Denmark, Russia, Romania, Yugoslavia, and Italy). The Ottoman Empire was dismembered. Turkey lost most of its land in Europe and Arabia was made into a mandate ruled by the British and French, Syria and Lebanon went to France and Iraq, Transjordan, and Palestine went to Britain. In the end, all of this up-carving was naught but a gigantic failure, the consequences of which we are still living with today.

The bug in the broth was obvious. People migrate. In the fifty-one years of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, peoples moved within it. All Poles did not stay in the area that became Poland; Serbs did not stay in Serbia; Croats did not stay in Croatia. When the empire was dismembered, peoples of all nationalities were everywhere. Putting them together again in homogenous groups was impossible. Additionally, some of those of German nationality ended up in France, Denmark, Poland, Czechoslovakia and who knows where else.

Realpolitik in Europe in the early twentieth century was characterized by a plethora of treaties. Bismarckian balance of power relationships ruled the day. Nations lined up with each other to oppose other groups of nations to balance another group's power. The idea was that if the groups were equally strong peace was assured. How wrong they were.

Even after the war these balance of power relationships continued. (In fact, they continue to this day.) So when Germany began to balk at the onerous conditions placed upon it by the Treaty of Paris, it wanted to retake the territory it had lost and reunite the German peoples scattered throughout Eastern Europe. The peace lasted a mere twenty-nine years! Germany easily took back the territory that had been ceded to France. The Austrians, being a Germanic people, willingly allowed Austria to be annexed. Then the Germans went for the Germans in the territory that had been ceded to Czechoslovakia. War was on the horizon because England and France objected to all of this German expansion, but they ultimately acquiesced, drawing a line on any German expansion into Poland by committing their countries to go to war with Germany if Poland were invaded. In essence, they wrote a treaty, believing that this treaty would work to balance their power with Germany's and thus prevent war. But it was a sham.

Germany, knowing that neither England nor France were prepared to go to war, invaded Poland on September 1, 1939 after signing the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with Russia (the USSR) to keep it from joining England and France. As a result, the English and French made some minor forays into Germany that were easily repulsed, and Germany easily overran Poland. After that, the English were driven from the continent and the French surrendered.

Almost everyone knows this story, so why am I retelling it. Well the story is old news and not important, but no one has analyzed the role of the treaties involved in it.

What effect did the English and French treaty to come to the aid of Poland have? It didn't prevent the war. Nor did it help Poland which was overrun at least twice and utterly destroyed. The English and French never liberated Poland. The treaty didn't extinguish Germany's desire to expand its territory, for shortly after France surrendered, Germans invaded Russia. What did this treaty do? It merely expanded the war.

For the purposes of this paper, it doesn't matter that that expansion may have been a good thing in the long run. What is most important is the recognition that when the treaty was invoked, it diminished the sovereignties of both England and France.

A nation is sovereign when it alone is responsible for its behavior. A sovereign nation can go to war or not. A sovereign nation makes its own decisions. But neither the British nor the French made the decision to go to war. The decision was made in Berlin. The German decision to invade Poland was also a decision to bring England and France into the war. After agreeing to come to Poland's aid, the British and French no longer had any say in the matter. It was all up to Germany.

Germany and Italy were in a similar position. They had a mutual assistance treaty with Japan. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, the attack brought Germany and Italy into a war with the United States, a war which neither Germany nor Italy wanted at the time. So the treaty with Japan reduced Italian and German sovereignties. The decision to bring them into war with the United States was not made in Berlin or Rome; it was made in Tokyo. That decision was completely up to the Japanese. The Germans and Italians had nothing to do with it.

So the interesting question is, do all treaties reduce the sovereignties of the nations that enter into them? I am certain the answer is yes. Treaties which are entered into in hopes of preventing wars ultimately expand them and nations find themselves fighting wars they never conceived of because an insignificant member of a treaty can somehow start a war that then extends to all of the treaty's signatories.


In fact, World War I started in exactly that way. The war which killed more than 15 million and wounded more than 20 million was started by the assassination on June 28, 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, by a Yugoslav nationalist. Because of it, Austria went to war with Serbia. Alliances formed over previous decades, brought the major powers into the war within weeks. How many of these nations would have gone to war over that assassination had the treaties not existed? No one will ever know!

None of the nations except Austria had a hand in deciding to go to war. The decision for every nation involved, except perhaps the United States, was made in Vienna. By signing these treaties, each of these nations gave up their sovereignties. They were no longer masters of their own fates.

Since the end of World War II, the United States has insanely fostered treaty making. There are NATO, SEATO, and only Washington knows what else. Any puny nation that is part of any of these treaties can draw not only the United States but all of the other signatories in to a colossal conflagration. Americans like to pretend that they control these treaty-groups. America refers to itself as a "first among equals." But that expression is an oxymoron. If there is a first, the rest are not equals, and if all are equal, there is no first! How would Americans react if something happened in Bangladesh that drew the United States into a worldwide war? Realpolitik is a receipe for disaster. Why have we not paid attention to the advice of George Washington?

Two European immigrants to America, both Bilderbergers, who speak with heavy European accents and harbor Bismarckian complexes bear much responsibility for this situation, (Bismarck's balance of power policies brought peace to Germany for a mere 43 years) but they are not alone.

However balance of power treaties are not the only culprits. Trade agreements are just as bad. Look at what the Maastricht Treaty which established the European Union has done to Greece and threatens to do to other European countries. Today's Quisling Greek government is now little more than a tool of Europe's more prosperous states. When Greece's former socialist Prime Minister George Papandreou proposed a popular referendum on the Greek sovereign debt bailout, the European Union scotched it. Now Greece no longer has the power to call an election that the Union objects to. Greece has even lost its democracy.


West Seeks to Perpetuate Syrian Bloodbath

The Whore of Babylon
giving Satanic illuminati sign
'Friends of Syria' summit in Istanbul seeks means of rehabilitating, rearming, and redeploying hobbled terrorist proxies.

Note: Much of this report is based on James Corbett's recent presentation, "R2P or: How the Left Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace Wars of Imperial Aggression."

Even with violence ebbing across Syria as order is restored, Kofi Annan is still attempting to peddle a "peace deal" between the Syrian government and militants -- demanding Syrian troops be withdrawn from cities just recaptured from terrorist forces.

And as Annan seeks a reprieve for remaining militant forces, the West is meeting in neighboring Turkey, devising a method to rearm and redeploy them in order to reignite and perpetuate the bloodshed they claim they are trying to prevent.

More specifically, BBC reports in their article titled, "Syria crisis debated at Istanbul talks," that ways are being "explored" to "step up pressure on the Syrian regime and bolster the opposition." The report also makes mention of calls to arm the opposition. There is also funding being given by the West and the Arab League to literally "pay" terrorist to get back into the fight. Surely, placing pressure on a government that has just restored order across the country, while "bolstering" and arming the opposition will only trigger yet another round of bloodshed and violence.

Indeed the entire premise of the "Responsibility to Protect (R2P)" doctrine follows that if a nation is incapable of providing protection for its own population, it relinquishes its sovereignty to direct intervention by the "international community." Should such a nation manage to restore order, however, the R2P doctrine along with the meddling it justifies and the window for regime change it opens no longer applies. Knowing this, and realizing the window for forcing regime change in Syria is closing, the West is actually seeking ways to perpetuate the bloodbath, not end it, until their objective of removing President Bashar al-Assad has been achieved - revealing in incredible detail the insidious nature of the so-called "humanitarian" R2P model.


This includes foreign-funding to create proxy opposition movements within targeted nations, training, equipping, and funding mobs of protesters to sow unrest, providing covert military support to ensure the survival of these proxy movements, and a series of financial and economic measures, including sanctions used to poison the will of a nation's people against their government and foster division within ruling parties. Essentially, the violence that then predictably unfolds is cited as justification to intervene more overtly and ensure regime change is accomplished and a series of neo-liberal reforms instituted.

Real Gun Control is the People Disarming the Federal Government


One of the biggest causes of premature death of people that far surpasses car accidents, plagues and natural death is the hand of the tyrannical government. It is the government that should not be trusted with guns. The BATF will raid a house of a home with a person who has a thousand rounds of ammunition and a few rifles. On the six o'clock news, the feds will call it an arsenal. When the government buys 450 million rounds, it is preparation. They will deny a veteran the right to keep and bear arms for PTSD due to being in combat. At the same time, the government will gladly allow some veterans who came back from multiple deployments from Iraq and Afghanistan who are mentally unstable to wear a police uniform being allowed to carry a gun and a badge..

This is the same government nearly 19 years ago burned down the Branch Davidian Church in Waco Texas. A little over 20 years ago, government agents at the siege at Ruby Ridge Idaho fatally wounded both teen-age boy and his mother. There have been abuses by government agents working for the IRS, the FBI, DEA, Homeland Security and the BATF over the years when the use of force was not necessary. They break their own laws we would go to prison for. So tell me, who is the threat? Is it us or them with the guns?

They break down doors with no knock warrants in the middle of the night, with a good number of those searches being the wrong house. They terrorize children and innocent families for no reason. The government going in with their guns drawn on unsuspecting people raiding organic food stores when force was not needed says one thing needs to be done. I do not think the people are going to wait for congress to pass a law to stop it. Never mind fearing the people being armed being the problem. It is the government cannot be trusted with too many guns.

It is time for Real Gun control which is the People disarming the government of their guns they are abusing the American people with. The government has too many guns and too many people who are mentally unstable who should not get a gun and a badge in the first place. The only federal agents who should have guns are the Federal Marshals, the Secret Service ,the Treasury Department and the Border patrol, which are constitutional functions that require the agents to be armed. The other alphabet soup agencies should not be armed because they are not constitutional. For many years, the FBI agents did not carry firearms.

It is time for the people to disarm the Federal government; they have become a threat to the safety and security of the American people. They are a rogue band of criminals running wild. The President wants to disarm us because they do not have a monopoly on deadly force. We have seen what happens when the people are disarmed and the government has all the guns. We see mass murder and genocides. We see mass graves. This is why the government must be disarmed of its unconstitutional powers by removing the guns away from agents acting outside the Constitution.

Lawful Federal agents are armed because the people delegated the right to keep and bear arms to these hired officers to perform a function for the safety and security of the nation. I know when Obama tries to send out police and soldiers to do house to house searches to confiscate the guns. We might see not the people being disarmed, but the government. With those 450 million rounds of ammunition, DHS just purchased. All those bullets might all be put back into the proper hands where it belongs. That is with the people and the militia.

Using the Treyvon saga to go after the right to self-defense and the right to keep and bear arms will not work. People know the scam of gun control. When there are 5 million purchases of firearms of month by the people because they do not trust the government. They can go after the ammunition and the gun all they want. At the end of the day, it will be the people who will disarm the government. It is not the people who need to be disarmed. It is the government where gun control is needed. Even Ron Paul says the government is the one who needs to be disarmed, not the people. What is your opinion?


UK: School Meals are ‘Made Smaller to Save Money’


David Cameron: Evil personified 

School meal portions are being shrunk, leaving children to go hungry, teachers and parents have warned. Smaller portion sizes caused by cost-cutting are reported in schools across the country and are of particular concern, given the increase in the number of impoverished pupils who rely on school lunches as their only hot meal of the day. Primary-age children, in particular, are going hungry after being given lunches that are too small, according to teachers.

The findings of a study by the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) were confirmed by individual teachers and parent groups who told The Independent it was a growing problem that had to be addressed. “Children are going hungry in schools and we all know what hunger does to your ability to learn,” said Mary Bousted, the ATL’s general-secretary.

“It is no surprise that, in the current economic climate, there has been an increase in the uptake of free school meals … For some children, it may be their only hot meal of the day.”

Figures from the School Food Trust show that the number of children eligible for free school dinners increased by 43,000 to an estimated 1,055,000 in 2010-11. More than a third of education staff have reported an increase in the take-up of free meals since 2007.

In the ATL survey, teachers warned that private providers, who are often hired to supply school meals, were cutting portion sizes to make their budgets go further and win new contracts. “The younger children pay the same price but get much less than the older ones,”  said one reception class teacher in [Muslim occupied] Bradford. “Also, they do not get the choice as this is also saved for the older ones.”


Lemmingwood = Sheeple = The United States Of Illusion Slaves!


By Richard Clarke

Lemminghood is not an intellectual phenomenon - it is psychological. As such, no socio-economic class is immune to its strangulating effect. A grant- seeking university scientist can be a lemming just as much as a fashion obsessed teen-age girl. One blindly follows the latest trendy theory while the other follows the latest clothing style. What's the difference? Neither can resist the force of nature. The power to fit in with one's social peers can be irresistible. To a human lemming, the logic behind an opinion doesn't count as much as the power and popularity behind an opinion. Man, like lemming, behaves collectively. And it could be no other way. Naturally, the individual must be equipped with this trait. Otherwise, the smallest steps toward civilization could never have been made. Lemminghood is a necessary, sociological survival trait, an inborn instinct in the majority of people. However, as with all natural phenomena, this tendency can be manipulated and used for harmful purposes. The same lemming effect which enables the masses of a justly governed society to make progress all at the same time, can, in an unjustly governed society, cause the masses to lose their sense of judgment, all at the same time.

This research paper will likely be wasted on many lemmings. For lemmings, denial is a basic psychological defense mechanism used to not only shield themselves from unpleasant realities, but also to reassure themselves that they will still fit within the acceptable range of opinion held by their peer group. At all costs, their beliefs must always be on the “right” side of the issue and conform within the boundaries of their lemming peers. Lemmings simply cannot bear the burden of responsibility, or the social discomfort, which comes with thinking independently. They are capable only of repeating that which they hear from the talking heads and “experts” on TV. Lemmings will not only resist efforts to change their misguided beliefs with all of their mental energy, but they will usually attack anyone who dares to question their myths. Lemmings are absolutely terrified at the thought of being labeled as an "extremist" or a "conspiracy theorist". Ironically, the very same lemmings who instinctively ridicule all "conspiracy theories", are always the first ones to blindly swallow the most ridiculous conspiracy theories imaginable when the government and media present them!

We can try to open the closed minds of lemmings and free them from their self-imposed blindness, but it’s not easy fighting the forces of Pavlovian conditioning and human nature. The chains of ideological conformity have too strong of a grip, and breaking them is a difficult task. With the limited resources at our disposal, it is next to impossible to compete with the media lemming-masters. Lemmings have been conditioned to obediently grovel before the “authority“ of their media and government masters. For this reason, the lie of the emperor is always believed before the truth of the peasant. Nevertheless, some of us must make the meager attempt, and thus lay the foundation upon which the truth might one day rise again.

Signs That America Will Soon Be A Nation With A Very Tiny Elite And The Rest Of Us Will Be Poor

The middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence in the United States today. America is a nation with a very tiny elite that is rapidly becoming increasingly wealthy while everyone else is becoming poorer. So why is this happening? Well, it is actually very simple. Our institutions are designed to concentrate wealth in the hands of a very limited number of people. Throughout human history, almost all societies that have had a big centralized government have also had a very high concentration of wealth in the hands of the elite. Throughout human history, almost all societies that have allowed big business or big corporations to dominate the economy have also had a very high concentration of wealth in the hands of the elite. Well, the United States has allowed both big government and big corporations to grow wildly out of control. Those were huge mistakes. Our founding fathers attempted to establish a nation where the federal government would be greatly limited and where corporations would be greatly restricted. Unfortunately, we have turned our backs on those principles and now we are paying the price.

When you have great concentrations of wealth and power, the economic rewards of a society tend to go to just a few. In the United States today, big businesses and wealthy individuals fund the campaigns of our politicians, and in turn our politicians pass laws which rig the game in their favor. It is a symbiotic relationship which is very bad for America.

Sadly, most conservatives tend to cheer on the big corporations, but this is not how our founding fathers envisioned our capitalist system working. Our founding fathers envisioned large numbers of similar companies competing against one another for customers. They did not envision a very small number of giant corporations buying up all of their competitors or smashing them into oblivion with their giant piles of money.

True conservatives should want to see more competition instead of less competition. Competition helped make America great, and we need to get back to that. Instead of an economic landscape dominated by monolithic predator corporations, we need an economic environment where millions of small businesses can thrive and compete directly with one another.

Our founding fathers never intended for us to have the kind of system that we have today. As I have discussed in previous articles, our founding fathers greatly restricted the size and scope of corporations in early America. The following is how author Stephen D. Foster Jr. described the attitude toward corporations in the early years of the United States....


Bikinis, beach burkas and bird flu - welcome to London 2012


The second series of the Olympics send-up, Twenty Twelve, kicked off on BBC2 at the weekend with a story-line about Algeria threatening to boycott the Games because none of the walls in the ‘Shared Belief Centre’ faces Mecca. If you are not familiar with the show, it’s a spoof, Office-style, fly-on-the-wall documentary, which follows the travails of the fictional Olympics Delivery Committee.

Sharply written and directed by John Morton and starring Downton Abbey’s Hugh Bonneville, the first series won Best Sitcom at the British Comedy Awards. It captures beautifully the nonsense surrounding the modern obsession with ‘diversity’ and ‘sustainability’. Meetings are a barrage of meaningless buzzwords and management bull.

The organising committee spends its life either cravenly appeasing or unintentionally offending special interest groups. The problem with satire, of course, is staying ahead of the game. Writers can construct the most absurd scenarios only to discover that life has already beaten them to it.


For instance, Twenty Twelve would be hard-pressed to come up with an episode in which Olympic volunteers were issued with official advice about what to do if a man in a dress approaches them asking the way to the toilets. But that’s precisely what has happened. ‘Do not make an assumption about their gender unless directed by their name. If you are asked, provide instructions to the male/female and accessible toilets.’  Staff have also been told that they must avoid ‘patronising words’ such as ‘young man’ and ‘dear’. They shouldn’t use ‘able-bodied’, either. The approved term is ‘non-disabled person’.

When that advice was published, I wondered how long it would be before the organisers decided that instead of actually running races, medals should be allocated by quota, based on ethnicity, gender and sexual proclivity.

There’s still time. If you pay attention to some of the pronouncements coming out of the mouths of certain members of the real-life London 2012 Organising Committee (LOCOG) you may well draw the conclusion that swimming, running, jumping and throwing things is of secondary importance.

It would appear the real purpose of the Games is job creation and ‘celebrating diversity’


Stephen Frost, the committee’s Head of Diversity and Inclusion — a title which could have been plucked from Twenty Twelve — told a Canadian newspaper: 
‘The London vision will definitely empower change, enhancing the hiring of disabled people, including gays and lesbians and dealing with homophobia in sport, bringing cultural communities together.’
Mr Frost was recruited by the Olympics organisers on the basis of his extensive experience as a member of the gay rights pressure group Stonewall. He also admitted that LOCOG has paid well over the odds for building and services contracts to meet self-imposed diversity commitments which were ‘drawn up on the back of an envelope’.

Work was awarded to firms which agreed to employ disabled or ethnic minority staff, not to those which submitted the most competitive tenders. ‘We’re not going to solve the world’s problems, but we are going to use the power of the Games for change,’ Mr Frost boasted.

Incidentally, the cost of the Games now stands at £9.3 billion and is projected to rise still further. The original bid set the total budget at £2.37 billion.

For the record, the £6 billion overspend is equivalent to the entire ‘savage’ cuts in public spending allegedly being imposed by the wicked Tory-led Coalition, but there hasn’t been a peep from the BBC or any of the usual suspects. Still, it’s only money. What’s six billion quid when measured against the universal benefits of ‘celebrating diversity’?



Mind you, not all countries are quite so keen on celebrating diversity as we are in Britain. Saudi Arabia originally planned to send an all-male team and only relented when the organisers agreed to allow Muslim women to wear specially designed outfits to protect their modesty. But I wouldn’t put money on the Saudi women’s beach volleyball team winning gold. Bouncing about in a burka isn’t ideal when you’re up against a bunch of fit Aussie birds in bikinis.

Just as well they’re not holding the beach volleyball in Bradford. The bikini babes would be lucky to get out without being stoned to death.

Then there’s the very real prospect of athletes from some of the world’s more oppressive countries absconding and applying for asylum. The Home Office is trying to head this off at the pass by issuing visas which prevent competitors and spectators from outside the EU getting married or forming civil partnerships to allow them to stay in Britain.

Fat lot of good that will do. The yuman rites lawyers are already circling. Don’t be surprised to see the Syrian 4 x 400 relay team running straight across the finish line and heading directly to the immigration centre at Croydon.


When the Commonwealth Games was held in Manchester, the entire Sierra Leone squad disappeared and hasn’t been seen since. As for the ‘legacy’ of 2012, once the Games are over we’ll need the Olympic Village to house all the foreign athletes and officials fighting deportation.

And I don’t want to depress you, but the World Health Organisation is warning that Britain faces a full-scale flu pandemic this summer, spread by tourists arriving in London for the Olympics.

Apparently, the huge crowds will create the perfect conditions for the transmission of bird flu and swine flu. Let’s hope all those vaccines ordered by Labour during the last scare aren’t past their sell-by date.

For the moment, the authorities seem to be more concerned about sexually transmitted diseases. Over the past year, more than 80 brothels near the Olympic site in East London have been closed down and prostitutes are complaining they are being driven from the streets. Some have been given Asbos and curfews to stop them touting for business. Sounds to me like another losing battle. A major international sporting festival without hookers is as unimaginable as Cheltenham races without Guinness.


Even if the police succeed in preventing prostitutes picking up punters on street corners, it won’t stop all those VIP members of the ‘Olympic family’ ordering up escorts on room service in their swanky West End hotel suites, all expenses paid courtesy of the British taxpayer.

Anyway, prostitution has a proud traditional link with the Olympics. At the early Olympiads, which began in 776 BC, winners were invited to take their pick of prostitutes from the Temple of Aphrodite. Perhaps the 2012 organisers would like to truly celebrate diversity by bringing back chariot races and human sacrifices. That would attract a lot more viewers than the dressage.

It seems the only people who have really captured the spirit of the original Games are the builders working on the stadium. They have been staging their own cut-price Olympics — hurling mallets in a mock hammer-throwing contest, using half a breeze block as a shot putt and charging round the track in their wellies and hi-viz jackets.

And don’t get me started on the fatuous ‘Cultural Olympiad’ costing the thick end of £100 million, just so the ‘arts community’ don’t feel left out.

This involves, among other things, creating a ‘corkscrew of mist’ on Merseyside; building a 10 metre-high puppet of Lady Godiva in Coventry, which will ride to London on a white horse powered by 100 push-bikes; and staging a West African arts festival in Manchester, inspired by a speech by Ghana’s first president Kwame Nkrumah, in which he said: ‘We face neither East nor West, we face forward.’

Beat that, Twenty Twelve.

UK: Race Traitor George Galloway weds new Dutch(?) bride

After his sensational by-election victory of last week, he might have been expected to pause for breath. Instead, three-times-married ‘Gorgeous George’ Galloway flew to Amsterdam and took a fourth bride – a woman 30 years his junior. The ceremony, in a hotel, happened less than 48 hours after the MP took the Labour stronghold of Bradford West with an astonishing 10,000-plus majority for his Respect party.


After his sensational by-election victory of last week, the newly appointed MP for Bradford West, right, flew to Amsterdam and took a fourth bride, Putri Gayatri Pertiwi, left, a woman 30 years his junior. The fourth Mrs Galloway is a Dutch-born researcher of Indonesian extraction who took a degree in cultural anthropology at the University of Utrecht.

 It is a mere four months since his third wife had given birth to a son – their second. The latest bride of 57-year-old Mr Galloway is anthropologist Putri Gayatri Pertiwi. At 27 she is two years younger than his first child, Lucy, a mother of two.

The latest bizarre development in the life of the flamboyant politician was confirmed yesterday at his bride’s office in Amsterdam, where he was at her side.

The former Miss Pertiwi, a consultant with a Dutch research firm, had earlier been listed as his fourth wife on his Wikipedia site. ‘Yes, it is true that George and I have married,’ she told the Daily Mail. ‘The service was on Saturday in a hotel in Amsterdam.’ Mr Galloway then took over the phone and added: ‘Well, it looks like you have an old-fashioned scoop on your hands.’


The former Labour MP for Glasgow Hillhead went on: ‘Putri is an anthropologist and child rights specialist and we have known each other for about six months. The next few months will be interesting because I will be working back in Westminster as an MP. But we will be moving around between London, Bradford and Amsterdam.’

Last night Mr Galloway arrived with his bride at his £1.4million house in Streatham, south London. She smiled and said: ‘Thank you’ when she was congratulated on the wedding.



WIVES AND TIMES OF GORGEOUS GEORGE

From 1979 to 1999, Mr Galloway was married to his former teenage sweetheart, Elaine Fyffe. They had a daughter, Lucy, now 29 with two children of her own. The couple separated in 1987 but did not divorce for a further 12 years.

The politician had already taken Dr Amineh Abu-Zayyad, a Palestinian scientist, as a second wife in a Muslim ceremony in 1994. A year after his divorce from Elaine in 1999, he married Dr Abu-Zayyad in a civil ceremony.


In 2009 Dr Abu-Zayyad obtained an uncontested divorce citing unreasonable behaviour. In divorce papers she said the marriage had irretrievably broken down because his friendships with other women left her depressed.

By this time the Respect MP had already had a son, Zein, with his Lebanese former researcher, Rima Husseini, whom he had married in a Muslim ceremony in 2007.

At one point Mr Galloway was reported to have split from his third ‘wife’. But a second son, Faris, arrived in December 2011. It is not clear if or when the couple were divorced.

Last night Miss Husseini was not prepared to discuss Mr Galloway’s latest marriage. At her home in North Kensington, West London, she said: ‘I don’t want to go into what’s happened. I’m sorry. I have two young children and they are all I am concerned with right now.’

UK: Revealed, snoopers charter will cost YOU £2bn

Huge price of plan to let state spy on websites, emails and texts


Big Brother plans to spy on all internet visits, emails and texts will cost the taxpayer £2billion. The extraordinary bill was revealed amid revelations that Britain’s snooping watchdog has grave doubts about the mass surveillance project.

The Office of the Information Commissioner said the case had ‘not been made’  to justify the sweeping expansion in the power of the police and other public bodies to trawl through private communications, including visits to Facebook and eBay. Internal ICO papers, marked restricted, say the Orwellian plan could lead to the innocent being wrongly identified as criminals or terrorists and barred from flying.


A huge row has broken out at Westminster over the plans, which look certain to be included in the forthcoming Queen’s Speech. Splits in the coalition over the proposals were signalled by Tim Farron, the Lib Dem president. He said: ‘We didn’t scrap ID cards to back creeping surveillance by other means. The State mustn’t be able to trace citizens at will.’

In opposition, both the Tories and the Liberal Democrats were fierce opponents of the policy, first suggested by Labour in 2006. They are now pointing to the huge estimated cost of the spying project at a time when the Government is making cuts elsewhere.


The Home Office estimates that the programme – under which internet providers will be paid to store hundreds of millions of pieces of data for up to two years – will cost £2billion over its first decade alone. Beyond this point there will be annual running costs of £200million – or £380 a minute.

Even these figures, which are based on 2009 prices, could be an underestimate given the complexity of the project – and officials’ terrible record for estimating the price of IT schemes.

The data will have to be stored securely, in a way which makes it easy for GCHQ, the government listening agency, to access. This requires huge resources which the Government has agreed to pay.


Ghost Riders in The Sky-Outlaws

Being a guitarist myself, I was really into the OUTLAWS in the 1970's and now I find myself getting back into them again. Sorry if this offends any Liberal Multicult Jew ass lickers but that's just the way it is. J.H.

Monday, 2 April 2012

Dr David Duke 02 April 2012

Dr. Duke and Dr. Kevin MacDonald discuss the NBC editing of the 911 tape of Zimmerman to the police dispatcher. NBC and the national media was caught in a bald-faced lie to feet a media and ethnic lynch mob. Also They discuss the huge sex scandal in the NY Jewish community and the lessons it affords for us.


Hardons comment:
Forget Alex Jones, David Icke and all the rest of Jew World Order 'Conspiracy theory' shills. David Duke is the only one out of the whole bloody lot of them who dares to say it how it actually is. He is the only one who actually mentions the almost illegal "J" word. 'Almost illegal' you say? Yeah well Nigger and Paki are classed as 'hate speech' over here in the UK. 

Some Left, Liberal race traitor scum even want to make the word 'Negro' a no-go. Well what about 'Kike', 'Hook nose', 'filthy Jew'? If you go around spouting off those words you are far more likely to get arrested than if you use the words 'Nigger' or 'Paki'.... Its anti Semitic you see even though the JEWS who rule the world Governments and Banks are in the main not actually Semitic. They are Khazar Europeans or Ashkenazi Jews as they prefer to be known. Well here's a big 88 to them all.

Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman Saga Continues


http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Twin%20Lakes%20Shooting%20Initial...
Previous video: http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/trayvon-killing-bs.html

EU: "We'll dump your dead relatives in the Sea to help save the Planet"


Exclusive report on perhaps the sickest proposal yet from the 'global warming' fanatics and the cultural Marxists in Brussels.

EU lunacy looks set to reach a new low if a proposal to close down crematoria and force everyone to be buried at sea becomes law. If the Eurocrats have their way, funerals by cremation would be phased out by 2020 in order to help meet the EU's stringent targets for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

Traditional Christian burials would continue to be permitted "until existing cemeteries are full", but no new graveyards would be permitted "in order to prevent competition from the dead for food supplies for the living on our increasingly crowded planet."

In place of traditional burials and cremation, the Report recommends the conversion of obsolete trawlers into a "European Green Funeral Fleet". Relatives would have the option of either attending the burials at sea or watching the committal to the deep on TV monitors in churches and chapels of rest.

In addition to the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, the macabre Report also sets out "environmental benefits to fish stocks" as another major factor in favour of the proposed legislation. Recital F, on page 34 of the 38 page document, lists "crustaceans and bottom feeders" as being the biggest beneficiaries of what it euphemistically refers to as "additional nutritional potential".

The Report also states that all fish stocks would, in addition, benefit from the fact that fishing vessels would be excluded from designated burial zones, all of which would have to be at least ten kilometres from land.



Hardons comment:
Of course this EU proposal will not apply to Muslims or Jews on Religious grounds