The 14 Words

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Why YOU Need To Be Terrified About These People


“The Jewish State”—What It Really Means and Why the Rest of the World Should be Terrified at the mere mention of it.

By Mark Glenn at the Ugly Truth

…On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abraham, saying “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates”…Genesis, 15:18

God spoke unto us saying, ‘Go to the hill-country and all the places nigh thereunto… in the Arabah, the hill-country and in the Lowland… in the South and by the sea-shore, the land of the Canaanites, and Lebanon, as far as the great river, the river Euphrates…Go in therefore and possess the land which the Lord swore unto your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, unto them and to their seed after them…Deuteronomy 1:6–8

Every place whereon the sole of your foot shall tread shall be yours, from the wilderness, and Lebanon, from the river Euphrates, even unto the hinder sea shall be your border…Deuteronomy 11:24

…From the wilderness, and this Lebanon, even unto the great river, the Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites, and unto the Great Sea toward the going down of the sun, shall be your border…Joshua 1:4


It’s amazing, just how easily it rolls off the tongue, in heated or even casual conversation…

‘Well, GOD gave them that land, and if we do anything to get in God’s face, He’s gonna get in OURS, and when He does, it ain’t gonna be pretty…’

This little religious ditty is the ‘science’ that Jewish interests (and their intellectually-comatose Christian-Zionist lackeys) have used now for close to a century in rationalizing the irrational and in defending the indefensible.

Mass murder, despoilment, displacement, the dehumanization of millions of innocent people in the Middle East and the total meltdown of all order–political, economic, military, social, et al–everywhere else, but as far as Israel and her supporters are concerned, these are just irrelevant details distracting us from the ‘real truth’ of the matter, which is—

…what ‘God’ wants…

Anyone doubting this is the case need do no more than check in at the front desk of the Jewish mainstream media on any given day where, like some gypsy fortune teller looking into a magic Kristol ball, there is always some vizier claiming to have hacked into God’s hard drive reminding the world in some fashion ‘how bad the weather’s gonna get’ if the Jews don’t get ‘that land’.

In their narration, there he sits, ‘Yahweh’, the Jewish God…fair-skinned, blue-eyed, white-haired…tic, tic, ticking away like a time bomb, just waiting for the right moment, and then–

BOOM!!!

–goes ‘biblical’, and in the process dishes out a healthy dose of holy hell against an insubordinate non-Jewish world for having ignored His plans concerning a certain Middle East real estate venture.

Now, do the long-bearded, curly-locked, black-hat-wearing, barely-literate ‘scientists’ presenting such a thesis use any form of measurable, visible, empirical data in ‘proving’ such a theory? Do they dust for fingerprints, take a sampling of carpet fibers, put bloodhounds on the trail or in any way collect even the minutest shred of ‘evidence’ for such a thesis that the rational mind can grasp?

Perish such insolent and heretical thoughts. In this case rather, the dope-dealers trafficking in this pure, uncut Kristol Meth mythology known as Judaism simply open up their Old Testament scrolls (which they themselves wrote) and recite a laundry list of bad things that (they say) happened to all sorts of people (s) who ‘got in the way’ of them getting their grubby paws on ‘that land’, including the 31 villages of yesteryear that (again, they say) were ‘wiped off the map’ by the ‘world’s most moral army’ under the IDF generalship of biblical luminaries such as Abraham, Moses, Joshua et al.


WAR with IRAN? You Decide.

WW3 Trigger? US To Implement Syria Aerial Blockade

Despite repeated warnings from Russian and China to respect the sovereignty of Syria’s airspace, the US plans on implement an aerial blockade without UN backing


Israel’s second largest newspaper is quoting a U.S. military official who has outlined a plan to implement a U.S. backed aerial blockade over Syria, reminiscent of the NATO lead no-fly zone over Libya. However, the news paper reports the plan is to be modeled after NATO’s intervention in Kosovo which led to shelling of the nation.

According to the report the plan calls for the establishment of international humanitarian missions to handle Syrian refugees before the blockade is to be implemented.

Earlier U.S. drones were reported to be operating over Syria which prompted Iran to say Syria has the right to shoot down the drones and stern warnings from China and Russia to respect Syria’s sovereignty.

Of course an aerial blockade, which would essentially mean nothing in or out, backed by U.S. airpower, will not work in Syria unless it is accompanied by a naval blockade. That presents another problem, since Russia and Iran have sent warships to Syria within the past few weeks and will not take kindly to being told they can not continue to do so.

Clearly, Russia, China and Iran have joined forces and said that Syria is the line drawn in the sand just as allied forces drew the line in the sand in Czechoslovakia before Hitler invaded marking the official start of World War 3.

Even if those nations don’t respond immediately with a declaration of war, a situation is created in which many events could occur for either side could us as a pretense to justify all out war.

Analysts are already saying the economic blockade sanctions against Iran is an act of war so an aerial and naval blockade surely fits the criteria.

We already know that Iranian military forces are on the ground.

A clash between those forces and western force could spark an uncontrollable chain reaction that would lead to a complete meltdown of foreign relations between the east and the west.

Let’s also not forget that Syria has hundreds, if not thousands of Surface to Air missiles, which are more than capable of shooting down military air craft in their skies.

Clearly with Iran knowing they are the next target after Syria, it is more likely they will wage a proxy war on Syrian soil than their own.

That war of course will have the full backing of both Russian and China.

Make no mistake about it, the situation in the Middle East looks like it is head straight toward a dead-end called World War 3 faster than we know it.


UK: It's Not Opportunity, It's Occupation


Written by Southwest Nationalist  

Bradford is a land of opportunity apparently. Idiot dhimmi headmaster Richard O'Sullivan calls it "an opportunity" that in his school only 26 out of 700, or roughly 3.7%, of children speak English as their mother tongue.

The figures for Byron Primary School speak for themselves.

Two thirds Pakistani heritage, a quarter Bangladeshi, the rest a mishmash of mixed race, white British, and random hangers on from all corners of the globe.

Just brilliant. Without a whimper we've become less than 1 in 12, and a white moron names it opportunity.

Forget integration or multiculturalism, however undesirable both may be in themselves, the only viable terms for this are racial replacement and mass colonisation.

You cannot possibly have a situation where 96% don't even have English as a mother tongue, let alone where percentages are obviously similar for alien racial heritage, and call it anything else.


It is the replacement of one racial group by another, the seeds of slow genocide via the border and the cradle.

When, for Bradford as a whole (and apparently London, Slough, Luton, and Leicester are even more 'enriched'), 43% of children overall also do not have English as a first language, we see that pattern repeating and expanding. It spreads out from an epicentre of colonisation and domination so to speak.

There is no integration at all - there is ostracisation of the indigenous and conquest of a nation. In comes the flood of the foreign, out go the indigenous in a ripple effect which spreads out until it encompasses all.

When those children, 43% for Bradford as a whole - higher since this figure is based only on language, not on race - have children of their own (and at doubtless higher birth rates than the white indigenous), we lurch yet further towards subjugated race in colonised nation.

The indigenous white British - all of us - are being replaced and the process is accelerating.

Britain? Nothing more than a set of lines on a map. British whites? Expendable, make way, the new colonists are here to make our land theirs.

We're expected to shuffle off without a whimper other than to ask our colonisers what we can do to make them happier as they conquer. All the while we'll be accompanied by the zealous voice of idiots like Richard O'Sullivan saying that it's an opportunity and not a problem.


If becoming extinct is an opportunity then go for it Richard, but speak only for yourself. We've no desire to go that way.

This land is ours, and there is very little of Britain in a school where less than 4% can even claim English as their mother tongue. That land has been taken from us. The few white, British children thrust into that cauldron have been made the strangers in their own nation, the ones who must integrate with the invader.

Would Pakistan, or Bangladesh, or Israel, or any other nation, call such a scenario where their own people are an almost extinct minority "an opportunity", especially if it were not an isolated scenario but were repeated across their nation?

Of course they wouldn't. Opportunity be damned, it's the quiet invasion of child, it's the seeds of our future oblivion. No other (non Western) nation is so stupid or suicidal.

Celebrate your fantastic teaching skills, raise our invaders to a high standard of English - at least that way we'll understand them when they recite the last rites over the grave of the indigenous British people. That's where it leads, there are no two ways about it.


"GOOD CHRISTIAN BITCHES"

By Rev. Ted Pike

There should exist a very powerful watchdog group honestly and fearlessly blowing the whistle when Christianity is defamed by Jewish big media, unafraid to identify its perpetrators as Jewish. 


The Anti-Defamation League does this for the benefit of Jews. Whenever a politician or Christian leader comments unfavorably concerning Jews or Israel, ADL demands an apology and virtually always gets it. The alternative is political or professional ruin.

But ADL is silent regarding the defamation of Christianity. Good Christian Bitches is a television sitcom to air on Jewish Disney/ABC March 4, based on a book of the same title. Due to protest, its title has been shortened to “GCB” in American markets. No one is fooled. The show portrays Christian women as petty, gossipy and vindictive.

Can you imagine ADL’s response if a sitcom were called “Good Jewish Bitches?” But it is predictably silent in this case, too busy decrying campus criticism of Israel, unauthorized use of terms like “holocaust” and “Hitler,” and getting the mildest critic of Israel, Pat Buchanan, sacked from MSNBC.

How can Christians defend themselves from propaganda attacks like GCB?

I suggest not wasting your time contacting ABC. It is owned by Robert Iger, who is Jewish. GCB is produced by Jewish homosexual Darren Star, who also brought us Sex and the City (another work notable for its degradation of women and utter contempt for traditional religious beliefs). These men no doubt expect your protest, laugh at it, and have probably programmed incoming email criticism for mass deletion.

Instead, inform as many people as you can about Jewish media’s agenda to trash Christianity and corrupt America.

1. First, get educated. Read my article “Updated: Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish”. For more documentation, contact the Standard and Poors and Lexis Nexus directories at your library. They confirm the saturation level of Jewish names heading and staffing ABC, CBS, and NBC as well as Viacom and Hollywood studios. A number of books written by Jews are also available in major libraries confirming Hollywood is Jewish. (The article, “Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon!” by Joel Stein in the LA Times is also instructive.)

2. Speak out in your church, conservative club, campus activist group, on the internet or as a caller on talk radio concerning the extent of Jewish power in media. Tell people it is not anti-Semitic to identify media monopolists as Jewish and anti-Christian. Wouldn’t you have such a right if Mormons or Muslims monopolized media, pushing their religious agendas?

3. Take these links to articles at truthtellers.org documenting Jewish media’s prior sordid record of denigrating Jesus and His followers.

Blasphemous Israeli Videos Have Ancient Roots
Spouse-Swapping on CBS as Church Stands By
Jewish ABC Celebrates Gay Marriage
Jewish Media Corrupts Teen Girls
Jews Behind 'The Ten'

'The Last Temptation of Christ' An Unnecessary Disaster in Christian-Jewish Relations
The Jews Behind Da Vinci Code
Judas: Historic Jewish Hero
Was the Talmud Behind NBC's 'Book of Daniel'?

Things could already be much worse. They are not, thanks to the courage of those who publicly proclaim that big media has a Jewish identity and agenda.

Jewish media and ADL never give up their offensives to corrupt and de-Christianize America. That’s why every lover of freedom must join the National Prayer Network in our offensive of truthagainst those who want to erect their Judaic new world order on the ashes of Christian civilization.

Britain is being rebuilt in aid of corporate power

Trust business, Cameron tells us, self-regulation is a force for social good. Silly me – I thought it was an invitation to disaster

They used to do it subtly; they don't bother any more. Last week a column in the Telegraph argued that businesses should get the vote. Though they pay tax, Damian Reece maintained, they have "no say in the running of local or national government". To remedy this cruel circumscription, he suggested that elections in the UK should follow the example set by the City of London Corporation. This is the nation's last rotten borough, in which ballots in 21 of its 25 wards are controlled by companies, whose bosses appoint the voters. I expect to see Mr Reece pursue this noble cause by throwing himself under the Queen's horse.

Contrast this call for an extension of the franchise with a piece in the same paper last year, advocating an income qualification for voters. Only those who pay at least £100 a year in income tax, argued Ian Cowie, another senior editor at the Telegraph, should be allowed to vote. Blaming the credit crisis on the unemployed (who, as we know, lie in bed all day devising credit default swaps and collateralised debt obligations), Cowie averred that "it's time to restore the link between paying something into society and voting on decisions about how it is run". This qualification, he was good enough to inform us, could exclude "the majority of voters in some metropolitan areas today". The proposal wasrepeated by Benedict Brogan, the Telegraph's deputy editor.

No representation without taxation: wasn't that Alan B'stard's slogan in the satirical series The New Statesman? Votes for business, none for the poor: this would formalise the corporate assault on democracy that has been gathering pace for the past 30 years.

This column is a plea for distrust. Distrust is the resource on which democracy relies. Distrust inspires the scrutiny and accountability without which representation becomes a lie. Distrust is all that stands between us and bamboozlement by people who, like Reece, Cowie and Brogan, channel the instincts of the billionaire owners of newspapers and broadcasters.

Last week David Cameron argued that those who say business "isn't really to be trusted" do so as a result of "snobbery". Business, in fact, is"the most powerful force for social progress the world has ever known". Not democracy, education, science, justice or public health: business. You need only consider the exemplary social progress in Zaire underMobutu, Chile under Pinochet, or the Philippines under Marcos – who opened their countries to the kind of corporate free-for-all that Cameron's backers dream of – to grasp the universal truth of this statement.


DAVID ICKE - THE PERFECT STORM OF HYPOCRISY..LIES & BULLSHIT

Zionists Willing Victims For Orthodox Jewry?

THE STRUGGLE TO SAVE ‘INNER’ EUROPE


By Brother Nathanael Kapner

THE STRUGGLE FOR EUROPE is personified in the persons of Marine Le Pen of France, Thilo Sarrazin of Germany, and Hilaire Belloc of England.

Marine Le Pen is the National Front candidate for the French presidential election to be decided on May 6 2012. Le Pen is known for her anti-immigration and anti-EU positions. (French Jewry has been intensely promoting pro-immigration policies throughout Europe with special emphasis currently focused on Sweden.)

Le Pen’s stand can best be seen by viewing her co-ordinate activities with the Lega Nord, an anti-immigrant Italian political party, which campaigns for the autonomy of northern Italy.

In 2011, Le Pen visited the Italian island of Lampedusa – which was a focal point ofuncontrolled immigration from North Africa – with Lega’s leader Mario Borghezio.

Borghezio has said that Europe must “remain white and Christian.”

In response to Switzerland’s defiance against joining the EU and its recent referendumbanning the building of minarets, Borghezio remarked, “The flag of a courageous Switzerland which wants to remain Christian is flying over a near-Islamized Europe.”


By all appearances, Marine Le Pen concurs with Borghezio’s position. In December 2010, she compared Muslims praying in the streets of Paris to the Nazi occupation of France:
“For those who want to talk about World War II being an occupation then we could also talk about Muslim prayers in the streets because that’s an occupation of territory.
There are of course no tanks, there are no soldiers, but it is nevertheless an occupation and it weighs heavily on local residents.” View Entire Story Here & Here.
THILO SARRAZIN IS a former executive of the Deutsche Bundesbank. Sarrazin was fired from the Bundesbank due to his ‘anti-Semitic’ and ‘anti-immigration’remarks in his 2010 best-selling book, “Germany Abolishes Itself.” The book was denounced by European Jewry for postulating a “Judeo-Muslim” threat to Europe.

What bothers these eternal enemies of nationalist sentiments is their recoiling over Sarrazin saying that “native” Germans will find themselves “overwhelmed” by Muslim immigrants who “build mosques” while Germany’s Church’s fall into decay. In Sarrazin’s own words:

“I don’t want the land of my grandchildren to become predominantly Muslim or to become a place where Turkish and Arabic are mostly spoken.
I don’t want my grandchildren to live in a country in which women wear headscarves and the daily rhythm is determined by the call of the muezzin.” View Entire Story Here.

Ireland should say FU to the FU Treaty


Ah, feck it, it’ll make no difference. Even if Ireland votes against the FU Treaty, it’ll be imposed anyway. It’s what happened when the country voted against Nice in 2001, and against Lisbon in 2008. Brussels won’t take ‘No’ for an answer.

This time, Eurocrats won’t even need to demand a rerun (‘go away and try again, Paddy…’) The fiscal compact has been specifically designed to be proof against ‘No’ votes: it will come into effect once 12 out of the 17 eurozone states ratify.

Still, I hope Ireland says FU to the Merkozy treaty, for four reasons.

First, Irish voters have never been asked about the loans-for-austerity package that has brought them to their present predicament. Every party at the last election (except Sinn Féin and the Trotskyists) supported the bailouts. The coming poll is the closest Irish voters will get to a say on whether they should be sent the bill for propping up the entire European banking system.

Second, Irish politicians have lied and lied again when it comes to Europe. Look at the montage above. Every party (except Sinn Féin and the Trotskyists) promised that a ‘Yes’ to Lisbon would bring an economic recovery. In fact, the 'Yes' vote led to two years of recession and unemployment. The same discredited politicians are now trotting out the same discredited argument about the FU Treaty. The Taoiseach declares without a blush that it 'remains a fundamental pillar of our economic and jobs strategy'. As they say in Ireland, ‘Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me’.

Third, Ireland deserves a debate on whether remaining in the euro serves anyone’s interest other than a handful of bankers and Eurocrats. Ireland is not Greece. It is not in this mess because of longstanding productivity problems. On the contrary, it had done everything right, and was running a healthy surplus going into the crash. No, Ireland’s problems come solely and narrowly from its membership of the euro. It won’t recover until it leaves.

Oh, and fourth, a ‘No’ vote in Ireland will again remind British voters that they still haven't had the referendum that all three parties promised before the last election. Every time another country gets the vote we are being denied, our patience wears thinner. Smile at us, pay us, pass us – but do not quite forget.



Britain gives £80m in aid to Turkey

Millions of pounds of British aid is being used to upgrade Turkey’s sewage system, MPs have been told.

Tory MPs reacted with anger last night as details emerged of a little-known Brussels scheme to channel hundreds of millions of pounds a year of aid into countries such as Turkey that are seeking to join the European Union.

MPs on the Commons international development committee were told that £570 million of EU aid money in Turkey last year, mostly on improving the sewage system to meet EU standards. In contrast, achieving EU sewage standards has required huge investment in Britain in recent decades, but this has been funded by increases in water bills.


The revelation came during a hearing in Brussels into how the EU spends the £1.2 billion of British aid money it receives each year. Britain’s share of the EU spending in Turkey is thought to total about £80 million.

Sunday, 19 February 2012

Myth Or Madness - Race Does Not Exist?


Does this picture make you feel sick? Well it does me!

Whenever a skeleton is found, the Police will call in a specialist Forensic Pathologist, who is able to, amongst other things, identify what race the skeleton belonged to. For example, there are (apparently) 19 identifying structures in a Human skull which can tell a specialist, with a high degree of accuracy, what race that the original owner of the skull belonged to. So, the question is: if race does not exist, why are Forensicist's so good at identifying them?.

loyalwhitebriton

Written by Southwest Nationalist

Race does not exist. That's Deborah Orr's great revelation and conclusion, writing in the Guardian.

"....nationality actually exists, while race, let's face it, doesn't" she says in an article titled "The myth of 'race' was invented by racism, and racism keeps it growing".

We're all one big, happy, human race. Individual races are merely artificial constructs to divide us. Best we just ignore such obvious perils as physiological or intellectual differences, not to mention other inconvenient facts such as certain racial groupings being susceptible to/carrying certain diseases in their genes.

To support this theory, bring on the wisdom of John Barnes. Yes, that John Barnes, the one who was sorely wasted on the football pitch when he should have been writing deep and enlightening treatises on race which would no doubt have revolutionised current thinking.

His gems, quoted in the Guardian article, include "Race is not a scientific reality", and that race was created "by governments, backed by the Church, to validate slavery and colonialism, to justify treating some people as less equal than others".

It's all just a conspiracy to keep a brother down, eh John?.

At any rate, the gist of Deborah Orr's article seems to be that racism created race and that in order to eliminate racism we must desist "from talking as if we accept the racist's idiotic premise, that there's a single soul on the planet of a different "race" to ourselves".

Race, which does not exist, is to be abolished to get rid of the racism which created the racist concept of race. D'oh, there's a confusing mishmash of madness straight out of the idiot liberal handbook.

Tempting as it is to just dismiss all this as the insane rantings of a liberal, it's actually worth considering what would happen if it gained credence. After all that's quite possible in a society hysterical about race, even if it would actually not result in all races being abolished but would be far more selective.

We've been told a lot recently by various mainstream sources that the white race, the indigenous British, don't really exist. We're energetic mongrels, the product of immigration, blah de blah. You don't see any mainstream outlet presenting such dubious and questionable theories as facts about any other racial group, do you?

Our existence, yours and mine, as a racial group is already called into doubt and under attack.

What we'd see with the abolition of race as an accepted reality is the forcing on to white people of the concept that the white race does not exist. Of course it would be executed more subtly than that, but that's what it would amount to. Whites would be expected to lead by example and abolish themselves - as indeed it seems we are doing right now.

Whilst that goes on, we'd still continue spending a fortune promoting the interests of other races in the UK, and they'd still - of course, and quite wisely - continue to wish to remain a race, and seek to further their race and their own interests.

It's easy to see where that ends up - it ends with the end of the white race.

No other race on earth would be as idiotic as to first of all put all other races before its own interest, and then to abolish itself in the interests of some insane equality drive. No race other than us that is, being danced into extinction like a puppet on a string.

Even were Orr's idiot assumptions regarding the non-existence of race utterly true, the end result of adopting them would be the same - no race other than us would be idiotic or suicidal enough to delete itself from existence in the name of some mono-racial world where race and racism are to be eradicated in some horrendous melting pot which, if realised, would destroy all peoples.

We'd abolish ourselves, and that vacuum would be seized upon and occupied by another racial group with more sense, and less crazed liberal ideas than those which have been foisted on us. Then again it could well be that this is the true goal, ably assisted by useful idiot white liberals like Deborah Orr.


Read more...


Hardons comment:

Race mixing between Caucasians and Negroes is tantamount to bestiality. 

Would you be happy if your daughter married the guy on the right? To produce half-caste kids and destroy your genetic code which took thousands of years to develop. No of course you wouldn't unless you were one of 'Gods chosen ones' that adheres to fact that this is all part of the plan.

The children of such unions have no real identity or belonging, they are lost, in some ways they are the victims of this vile NWO experiment.

Make NO mistake they want a world of 'Mud' slaves to serve the super rich that sit in judgement in their Ivory Towers, they do not want any racial identity among the masses, no National Pride just a hoard of of 'muds' that will shortly become slaves to them.

You thought you had problems when they mass induced Indians and Pakistani's into Britain? Well that was just the beginning, now they are flooding our country with Somalians and other sub-human species from the continent of Africa to finally wipe the White race out. 

Its no good blaming the worthless arse holes that come here tempted by our glorious Benefits System that is slanted in their favour while true Brits suffer, its all part of the plan. Anyone that votes Lib/Lab/Con is prescribing  their own destruction.

John Hardon

Staring into the abyss

Inside a despairing Greek nation where families queue at soup kitchens and women threaten to jump to their deaths as job losses mount

When Eleni Nikolaidou agreed to help a university research project, she was asked to plough through 6,000 newspapers from World War II.

Life was so difficult for the Greeks under Nazi occupation, she discovered, that papers printed ‘Recipes for Hunger’ on their front pages to help readers survive the deprivations of a dark chapter in history.

These included recipes for fried radishes and greens scavenged from parks, along with tips such as grating an aubergine on top of boiled rice to give the look of meat.


One item especially disturbed her: a suggestion that families collect the crumbs from their table after eating to make into a meal at the end of the week. ‘These were terrible times and thousands died of hunger, especially in Athens,’ said Nikolaidou, who is also a teacher. ‘But it struck me as outrageous that people were so hungry they had to keep the crumbs from their table to survive.’ She was so moved she turned her research into a book, reprinting many of the recipes and suggestions. To her surprise Starvation Recipes has become a big hit — a chilling symbol of the stark times confronting Greece once again.

What is so shockingly evident as you walk around Athens are the awful parallels between that war-time era and today. The soup kitchens, the beggars, the pensioners picking up discarded vegetables after street markets close, the homeless scavenging for food in bins. These are the signs that can be seen.

Less noticeable is the quiet desperation of dignified people who turn off heating despite the cold and share dwindling savings with jobless relatives. Or the workers unable to afford fares home and the children fainting in school from hunger.


It is three years since the financial tsunami struck Greece with dreadful force, exposing the most shocking example of a country living beyond its means. Three years of savage austerity — of sudden new taxes, salary cuts, job losses, rising prices and falling demand — have left the nation shattered and its citizens locked in a spiral of despair.

‘There are so many similarities between these periods,’ said Nikolaidou. ‘Of course, it was the Germans then, and once again the Germans are the dominant figures in our crisis now.’

Greeks seem torn between outrage at their venal politicians, anxiety over the future and the fierce anger they direct at Germany for demanding tough measures as the price of a European Union bailout to allow their country to continue to function.



Anguish: A police officer escorts a relative of Lambrousi Harikleia who was threatening to jump from an office block

The imposition of the latest package of conditions by the German-dominated EU and International Monetary Fund provoked riots last weekend, while newspapers made ugly references to the Nazis, and politicians talked of living under a ‘German jackboot’ as Europe’s festering wounds burst open.

Greece’s EU-imposed, unelected government has backed another devastating cutback in their economy — slashing the minimum wage, savaging welfare payments, sacking one-fifth of state workers — but many fear this is just one more chapter in a long-running tragedy.

It is only eight months since a previous package of austerity measures was supposed to solve everything. On the streets, people debate whether Greece should accept this latest deal or default on its debts and leave the euro, with all the devastating repercussions a return to the drachma would bring. They are damned whatever they do. Only one thing is certain: this nation of 11 million people is being slowly crucified on the cross of its adherence to the single currency.

It does not take long to discover the depth of the pain. Walking near Omonia Square, a central shopping area in Athens, I came across a large crowd. A man was pointing to a balcony three storeys up on an office block, where I could see the dangling legs of a distraught woman who was threatening to jump.


European Super State One Step Closer or Approaching Imminent Collapse?

Jean Monet, the founding father of the European Union, had a very particular vision of Europe's future back in 1952, and he expressed it in a letter to a colleague on 30th April that year: 

“Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”

Here, in a nutshell, we plainly see the trickery that stands behind the fabricated 'Union' of individual nations, each of which was led to believe that its economic and social stability would prosper once it committed to the 'common market' and the various treaties which mark its inexorable passage to 'superstate'.

The actual mission of the founders of the EU has always been something of a chimera; Monet's letter makes it clear however, that the motivation was both idealistic and elitist. The supranational entity was to be created “without (their) people understanding what was happening” following a pattern of elitist oligarchical ambition stretching back through past dynasties.


We can trace the roots of this latest 'superstate' experiment to the Schuman Plan of 1951, which was signed up to by six countries and took the form of a treaty (The Treaty of Paris) centred around coal and steel industries being placed under common management, ostensibly to prevent any recurrence of the death and destruction of the second World War. Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg were the signaturies to this treaty whose empirical purpose was stated to be ensuring that none of these countries could ever again manufacture weapons of war to be used against the other.

Then in 1957, the same six countries expanded cooperation to other economic sectors and signedThe Treaty of Rome. Thus creating the 'European Economic Community' also known as The Common Market. The UK joined up to this in 1973 under Mrs Thatcher.

The formal creation of the European Union, under the guidance of Jaques Delors, didn't occur until February 1992 under the Maastricht Treaty. It formalised the introduction of the European Parliament and European Commission, the latter gaining considerable 'management power' under Jaques Santer, its first president. Interestingly, the Commission was originally to be named “The High Authority”, which has strongly Masonic overtones. But this name was dropped in the 1960's.

The single currency (Euro) element of the expanding Union was launched in 1999, along with the European Central Bank. Lastly came the Lisbon Treaty of December 2009 which created the new post of President of the European Council.


Zombify to Unify: 'Euro schools pour propaganda brainwash'

Preserving Human Diversity and Freedom! - Dr David Duke

The Innocents Killed by Obama: They Never Saw it Coming


It's probably too much to ask an unrepentant murderer to speak the truth or show compassion, but even among murderers, the following video is a staggering example of having zero empathy. Even the warmongering Brookings Institution has concluded that there are 10 civilians killed to every 1 "militant" in Pakistan alone. Obama denies this, and a range of other documented evidence, when he states that only "precision strikes against al Qaeda and their affiliates" are undertaken. Then, listen as Obama makes a joke to the Jonas Brothers about being potential suitors for his own daughters. He says, "Boys, don't get any ideas. I have two words for ya' -- Predator Drones." I wonder if the family and who lost their daughter, or the community bombed in this video, would smirk quite the same as he.

US Is Being Conditioned For War On Iran

The staging of yet another war: We are what we claimed we despised

We are being preconditioned for another war of aggression, this time against Iran. We are being systematically deceived into thinking that Iran is now out to get us. Maybe they are…now. Let me see, we have cut off major food supplies, put a wrench in their banking system and messed up their economy, and have positioned several of our warships in the Straights of Hormuz showing them that we are a clear and present danger to their continued existence. They might just be upset with us. Ya think?

Announcements on cable news shows and subsequent statements by US officials claim that Israel is contemplating attacking Iran this spring some time. These statements are issued with a casualness of announcing a garden party. For some reason it is unacceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons, but quite alright for Israel to have more than 200 bunker buster mini nukes at their disposal provided to them by our government.

Three days after the initial announcement of this preplanned war of aggression in MSM venues, newspaper headlines across the country claimed “Iran planning attacks inside the US”. Personally, I believe that this is just advanced warning that future false flag attacks, perpetrated by the CIA on behalf of global interests will occur in the US. Of course, Iran will be blamed immediately, we’ll blow them off the map and ten years from now we’ll find out the whole thing was rigged and based on fictional events that never happened; at least not by the people we thought caused them. Don’t worry though. There will never be an honest investigation, no charges will ever be filed against those who really did attack us, and evidence will be destroyed faster than you can strike a match.

But we sold Israel those nukes and once the weapons were delivered, the stage was set.


THE INSANE WORLD OF ZOG (Zionist Organised Government)

A man freak thought to be Britain's first 'male mother' has told of his wish to live his life as a normal father.

The man, who was born a woman, gave birth to a healthy baby girl he calls his 'little angel' in March 2011 after ending the hormone treatment that had deactivated his womb.

He had been living as a man for five years and had legally changed his name and gender before deciding to attempt to conceive with his male partner, from whom he is now separated.


It is thought to be only the fourth case of its kind in the world, and comes four years after American transsexual Thomas Beatie, 38, sparked controversy by announcing his pregnancy. The Mail on Sunday knows the identity of the man but at his request is not going to reveal the details and will refer to him as 'Bob', which is not his real name.

Pictures of the little girl, seen by this newspaper, reveal a happy and beautiful baby with sparkling eyes and a beaming smile. A reporter spoke to Bob yesterday at his comfortable mid-terrace home in a residential area of a town in the North of England where he opened the door with his daughter cradled in his arms.


With short dark hair and a faint moustache, and wearing jeans, a blue polo shirt and sports trainers, Bob confirmed he had given birth to the little girl last year. He said: 'It's not something I want to become famous for. I don't want everyone to know that I'm transgender.'

Asked if he would speak to The Mail on Sunday about his experiences, he said: 'I would certainly want to help people in an anonymous capacity but I wouldn't want to become famous for that, I wouldn't want to be known like Thomas Beatie. And I have to think of my daughter and I don't think it would be good for her.'


The university graduate, 27, was in a gay relationship with another man. They parted recently and he is raising his child as a single parent. He requested anonymity because his history as a woman is not known to many of his friends, and he is reluctant to be labelled a transsexual parent because he identifies with being male.

His little girl, now 11 months old, is his biological daughter and was conceived using his own eggs. She is said to call him 'Dada' and Bob told The Mail on Sunday that he refers to his former partner as her 'other Daddy'.

The details of his case emerged in a fascinating and poignant blog written by Bob which charts the early days of his pregnancy and later announces the birth. In his first post, dated July 16, 2010, he writes of his excitement after taking a pregnancy test. Bob wrote: 

'I put it to one side while I checked my messages and then glanced over to see what it said, prepared to be disappointed. Not today. It said pregnant. As clear as anything, it said pregnant. I read it and re-read it, gave a cry of delight and rushed into the bedroom to tell my partner. I'm so thrilled, so excited, so apprehensive.
'I'm not the first man to have a baby and I won't be the last, but we're not fully accepted and understood yet, there's still a long way to go. But if there's one thing I've learned on my journey from being a girl to being a man, it's patience.'
A picture of his positive pregnancy test is also proudly displayed online. It is not clear how much surgery – if any – Bob had during the treatment to change his gender. But he refers to having taken male hormones in order to make the transition, which set in motion irreversible changes, including deepening the voice and increasing the amount and distribution of body hair.

Patients' lives will be at risk during Olympics


Olympic Road Network: This map highlights some of the roads in London which are expected to be given fast lanes, to help VIPs by pass congestion on the roads

Ambulances carrying the sick and vulnerable will be left stranded in traffic jams during the Olympics while dignitaries beat congestion with 'Games lanes' reserved for VIPs. Organisers for the London Games rejected a request from NHS London to let ambulances use the new fast lanes and have now been accused of risking patients' lives.

The lanes, which will be implemented across 39 miles of road in central London, will allow 80,000 accredited members of the ‘Olympic family’, including athletes, officials and sponsors to by-pass congestion on the busy roads.

Meanwhile ambulances will only be allowed in the lanes if they have their blue lights on. Blue lights can only be switched on by those specifically trained to do so and are only used in genuine emergencies and Leah Bevington, head of communications at Medical Services said this was totally unacceptable.


Rape is normal and part of being accepted into a group


Street gang girls will risk being raped in return for their membership of a group - according to a reformed woman gangster. Isha Nembhard, former member of an 80-strong gang in Peckham, south London, said being sexually abused when associating with male gangs was becoming normalised for many young woman. The 20-year-old said: 'It is about low self esteem and a craving for attention. Even if they know it's wrong, they will do it to get acceptance.'

Speaking to The Observer, she added: 'A lot of girls are sort of prostituting themselves to have sexual relationships within a gang and get treated in a bad way. For example, she might know about what happens to girls in the gang but sleeps with all of them just for the status.'

Nembhard said even after a girl has been abused, many maintain sexual relationships with the gang members because they feel they can not do better. She added young women are more girly now then when she was a teenager and more are becoming sexually active before they turn 16.

UK: Boy, 7, branded a racist

The mother of a seven-year-old boy was told to sign a school form admitting he was racist after he asked another pupil about the colour of his skin.

Elliott Dearlove had asked a five-year-old boy in the playground whether he was ‘brown because he was from Africa’.

His mother, Hayley White, 29, said she received a phone call last month to say her son had been at the centre of a ‘racist incident’.

She was then summoned to a meeting with Elliott, his teacher and the deputy head of Griffin Primary School in Hull.


Ms White, an NHS healthcare assistant, said: 
‘When I arrived at the school and asked Elliott what had happened, he became extremely upset. He kept saying to me, “I was just asking a question. I didn’t mean it to be nasty” and he was extremely distressed by it all.’
Ms White claimed she was asked at the meeting to read a copy of the school rules and in particular its zero-tolerance policy on racism. 
‘I was told I would have to sign a form acknowledging my son had made a racist remark which would be submitted to the local education authority for further investigation,’ she said. I refused to sign it and I told the teacher in no way did I agree the comment was racist. My son is inquisitive. He always likes to ask questions, but that doesn’t make him a racist.’
The school had launched an investigation after the younger boy told his mother about Elliott’s comment and she complained. Ms White, who lives in a three-bedroom house with her son and nine-year-old daughter Olivia, has now applied to have Elliott moved from the school. She claimed she was told there were places at nearby Thanet Primary School, but the council informed her last Friday that this was not the case.


These Savages call themselves 'BRITISH'


Police in Germany are considering charges of grievous bodily harm against British boxer Dereck Chisora following his bloody brawl with rival UK fighter David Haye.

A Munich police spokesman said Chisora, who last night lost to Ukrainian Vitali Klitschko on a points decision, was taken from the city's airport this morning to police headquarters in Munich for questioning. His trainer Don Charles was also being questioned as part of the official investigation into the post-bout incident.

It follows ugly scenes last night when the two heavyweight boxers brawled with each other in the Olympiahalle, Munich.

The spokesman confirmed that police were still searching for Haye, who was not present at the hotel when they sought to question him this morning. They now believe he may have left the city at 6.00am before they had a chance to speak with him.

Police said they are scrutinising videotapes from the fight to try to determine what happened and if other people should be prosecuted. A police spokesman said: 

'Police picked up Mr Chisora at the airport at approximately 10.30am (German time) and are bringing him in for the investigation. They also picked up Mr Chisora's trainer for questioning. The police went to the hotel to speak to them but we had been informed they had just checked out.
'At present we do not know where Mr Haye is. We are currently looking for him. He was not at the hotel this morning and we have not seen him at the airport.'
The police spokesman said the investigation was 'only at the very initial stages' and said there had been no arrests following the bloody brawl. The brawl began after Chisora allegedly mocked Haye for his poor performance against Klitschko's brother Wladimir last year and tried to goad his rival into a future bout.

Read more...

Haye vs Chisora Fight Video from Munich Presser - Full video

Homeless? We'll send you to Hull - Government Source


Homeless people in London could be sent as far a way as Hull because of a lack of private accommodation in the capital. That is according to housing charities who fear new government legislation will result in a mass exodus of those on the bottom rungs of the housing ladder to areas with cheaper rents. The coalition's Localism Act, which is due to be enforced in the spring, enables local authorities to place those without a home in privately rented accommodation.

And Croydon Council is already seeking accommodation in Hull and other Yorkshire towns to rehouse their homeless, with other boroughs expected to follow suit. 

Speaking to The Observer, Campbell Robb, chief executive of housing charity Shelter, said 
'The fact that councils may be considering making use of these powers to offer people homes away from their local areas - potentially having to uproot families from schools, communities and jobs - is testament to the scale of the housing crisis. This upheaval could have a devastating impact on the children's education and a family's well being. Taking families away from their support networks at a time when they need them most is not going to help them back on their feet.'
According to the Localism Act authorities have a duty to find suitable accommodation for people who are homeless, are occupying insanitary or overcrowded housing or need to move on medical or welfare grounds.

How a Welshman deals with the TV Licence creatures

Written by Green Arrow


I see that TaffMasterFlash has posted a new video on his youtube channel, showing just how to deal with those smarmy creatures who try to extort money from decent people by claiming that you must have a TV Licence to watch television - some people still do by all accounts.

For those of you interested in talking to TaffMasterFlash, who is a one man army when it comes to taking on The Establishment, you can usually find him in the British Resistance paltalk room. Well done Taff.

If you want a step by step guide on just how to deal with these government gangsters, then you should go to The People's United Community site and read their instructions here. Enjoy the video - One up for the Good Guys.



Like I said. Well done Taff.

The Military are fucking Idiot Puppets...

FUCK THE NWO

Saturday, 18 February 2012

Iran Nuclear Coverage Echoes Iraq War Media Frenzy


NEW YORK -- Military strikes expected! Weapons inspectors called in! A murky al Qaeda connection! And Cheney says time's up for Ira...

Wait. Haven't we seen this movie before?

It's already been a decade since the media hyped bogus WMD claims prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq. But it sure feels like 2002 for anyone who was around then and is now scanning newspaper headlines or watching TV talking-heads discuss a possible Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities -- an act which could pull the U.S. into another thorny Middle East military conflict.

Some of the media's more overheated Iran coverage bears an eerie resemblance to Iraq coverage, but instead of former Vice President Dick Cheney we have his daughter Liz Cheney making the Sunday show rounds.

"A nuclear weapon in the hands of the world's worst sponsor of terror, one of them, is something we can't stand for," Cheney said Sunday on ABC's "This Week."

The Iran nuclear story has also led several network newscasts this week. On Tuesday, ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer talked of a "shadow war being waged by Iran," followed by chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross describing a "violent series of attacks by Iran," which may be retaliation for the recent killing of Iranian scientists.

CBS News anchor Scott Pelley kicked off Wednesday's broadcast by saying that Iran is "defying the world," while NBC's Brian Williams asked if "the U.S. about to get dragged into a new confrontation."

One national security reporter, who has covered the intelligence community and Iran but was not authorized to comment, says that pre-Iraq War coverage and recent Iran coverage are "terrifyingly similar."

"I don't think we are falling totally back into where we were before, but I do think you're seeing, in some corners of our profession, we're making the same mistakes we made a decade ago," the reporter said. "We're taking things at face value and we're rushing to get ahead of a story that we don't know where it's going."

While questions have loomed for years about Iran's nuclear intentions and ability to produce weapons-grade uranium, we're now in the midst of a full-scale flood of stories suggesting that Iran is on track to build a nuclear bomb, and even some speculating that the Iranian regime may strike the United States, perhaps in collusion with terrorists.


POLICE STATE AMERICA

Police Shoot Unarmed 54 yr old Woman for Rolling Up Her Car Window

Bank of England, City of London and The Queen


One of the greatest deceptions in modern times is that the quaint little old Queen of England has no power and her role is purely ceremonial and for tradition. The fact is her role has not changed at all; just most of the Royal Family’s evil plans for world empire were hatched a long time ago in the old world. The British empire is still going strong, her common ancestors are in control of the US and the new world order. Now her majesty can sit back in her palace, relax and watch the world fall to bits, while the media paints a warm fuzzy picture of the family; who are in fact Nazi Germans.

The Queen is still Head of State and meets with important leaders from all around the world. One would assume they don’t talk about knitting or her pet corgis. Each day she receives documents and reports from Government ministers and Commonwealth officials. They must all be read and, if necessary, signed. So she is well aware of her country’s current affairs. She is also Head of the Armed Forces and is the only person that can declare war. Of course she meets with the prime-minister first, but it is still her duty and only hers.



On top of this she is Head of the Church of England. She appoints the archbishops and bishops; on what basis we can only imagine. In other words because she is the offspring of incestuous ancestors she is allowed to rule over people’s realtionship with God, just like the Pharaohs. It’s there in writing. “Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”. If God really did grace her with this position it would be nice to see the contract.

You don’t get any more elite in social circles than the Queen. The rich and powerful are just begging to be blessed with her astronomically wealthy presence. Tradition or not, Queenie is no innocent in anything. Somebody that asks for an extra £44m allowance during recession does not care about their people.

So where does her power end and the Government’s begin? Well the Government puppets do all the dirty work and the Queen signs the papers for the Government. Although she has more power than the majority believe, there is an even bigger power above both of these puppets. You guessed it, the private banking cartels that have a grip over the nation’s money. The Queen is fine, she is the richest land owner in the world and the bankers will always keep it that way; they have her family to thank for where they are today. The rest of us are not so lucky.


The Rothschild banking family is one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful family in the world; who rose to domination through the art of money changing. Money is the root cause of all evil; they are the route cause of all modern money!

Similar to Vatican City controlled by the Pope in Rome (another God appointed money hoarder), there is an independent state within London, known as the City of London. It is the richest square mile in the world, and London’s financial sector, housing banks and financial institutions from all major countries. The Governors of the city are called The Crown (deceptively nothing to do with the Queen), comprised of 13 members headed up by the Lord Mayor of the city (not the regular London Mayor). Today Ian Luder (of German decent like the Queen) is the allusive Lord Mayor, yet there is very little written of him online and his Wikipedia page is virtually empty. That’s because he wields incomprehensible power for the elites by manipulation of the economy.


The City of London is not part of England or the United Kingdom. It is a privately owned corporation masquerading as a county – often talking heads on TV will even call it London PLC. It isn’t under the power of the Queen or the Government. Her majesty and the Prime Minister are subordinate to the Lord Mayor and have to listen to him and his delegates on financial decisions; that is why during the financial news they always cut to “the City” for updates. If the Queen enters the Mayor’s city, she is met by him at the perimeter “Temple Bar”and must bow and ask permission to enter his private and sovereign state. He will dress in full regalia while she and her handlers dress in regular clothing. Get the idea? Even the old world Queen is a peasant to the new world order bankers. The city also has the pleasure of their own private police force, which is full of freemasons.

Along with the Rothschild family and their agents placed in various positions of financial power this secret mafia steer the world’s economy through the Bank of England, NM Rothschild & Sons and their web of private banks in all major nations. When an economic crash occurs it has most definitely been ordered from the City or across the pond by their associates at the Federal Reserve and Wall Street.

During a war you will never see the Vatican, City of London or Switzerland get attacked. On the grand chessboard these are considered neutral ground because it is where all the money flows. Without money to fund war, there is no war. Sitting somewhere in an ivory tower are the Rothschilds laughing at our stupidity. This happens right beneath our own noses!


While the Queen and her Government have control over our every day lives, our increasingly fascist laws and the issues that seem to directly affect us. The Rothschild family, the Lord Mayor, the financial City of London and WallStreet privately operate our currency and financial affairs, the real controller of our lives. We are in economic collapse, now you know where to look.

Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown “slave” colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful.

During the development of this two tiered British Empire the BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY (BEIC) owned by the CROWN began making a fortune through the Opium trade. One of their strategies was to get the vast impoverished Chinese population addicted to opium to create a mass market for the crop, while they also milked their exports at the same time. It didn’t matter to the Crown that China outlawed the drug. They wanted money and money they got.

The Royal Family also wanted their greedy claws on the profits so joined their counterparts in the CITY and negotiated a tax on the opium farmers in there Indian colony. Thus huge amounts of opium were shipped from India at a tax to China and the Royal Family added an enormous amount of money to their every increasing pot. Slaves in India produced the opium and gave them a cut for nothing, and impoverished laborers in China bought it to smoke while picking tea leaves for export back to Britain. Next time you pick up a box of teabags with the endorsement stamp “By appointment to Her Majesty the Queen”, spare a second for our Chinese neighbors.



The British Empire fighting China during the opium wars.

Now this was the 19th Century, not modern times, but over the years the operation became more sophisticated and secretive. Whole banks were created to launder the money, shipping companies were made to help hide the contents, and the corrupt institutions that are based out of the City of London and extend all over the globe still interface for world control and financial rule. From Bush’s Union Banking Corporation in America laundering Hitler’s finances, to the controlled collapse of the world’s economy in order to pool our tangible wealth, the bankers have always operated above the law, the state and modern royals.

The British may have had an enormous military empire in all corners of the globe, but the Crown and the City of London had their own economic empire that rules to this day. And that Empire started with the Bank of England.


Bank of England:


The Bank of England and its monstrous ancient temple of a building is the template for all big central banks that wish to perpetuate the global scam. Located in the private City of London the counterfeiting operation opened its doors in 1694 as an easy way for the Government to create finance. It was only later that the Rothschilds infiltrated the institution. The initial idea came from Scottish money changer William Paterson who some researchers claim was an initiate in to the Order of the Orange, a Merovingian Bloodline secret society developed by Dutch Freemason William of Orange.

Britain found it hard to find lenders with enough capital to meet their greed and warmongering debt issues, so when Paterson came along with a £1.2m loan they were more than happy to give him and his partners the exclusive rights to print the nation’s money and to continue loaning them money thereafter. Seemingly ignorant to the consequences of becoming indebted to private hands, Paterson was granted a 12 year charter, and thus the unethical monopoly London had over currency was now legally in the hands of Paterson…because they said so. Any independent free market bankers and traders would now lose out to the money changers.

While the royals used loans to extend the empire by force, the Bank used its economics to extend an empire by money and it wouldn’t take long for Britain to amass a dangerous level of national debt. It would increase every year and by 1844 the government owed the banksters over £11m. The original charter stated that after each term the government could sever ties with the bankers and go about their own issuance of currency, but because debt expanded each year under the weight of the system, they were hooked on a never ending fishing line of credit. It was eventually agreed that the bank could hold the monopoly until the government had paid them back. They have never come close to doing so, hence the ever increasing national debt and global private banking control today. Taxation goes to pay off the debt, not to fund public services.

Why does the Government allow this to go ahead, can’t they just tell them where to go?

Unfortunately it’s not that simple. The tentacles that the private banking cartels have spread around the globe are so interconnected with the entire economy and power structure that the Governments that are now in power are only puppets to the banks. There aren’t any true leaders left and probably very few that understand the system. After all they are more than happy to skim off the top in their expense accounts as hit the headlines in 2009. Gordon Brown the Prime Minister of England as of writing, granted the Bank of England operational independence to set interest rates in 1997 and sold all of the country’s gold overseas at knockdown prices before the economic crisis. You can see that they don’t much care about the situation.



Gordon Brown gave free reign to the Bank of England to set interest rates in 1997, now since the crash he is calling for a New World Order for the economy; coincidence?

You then have to factor in laws that have been developed over the years to accommodate the banking scam. You’re not even allowed to talk about the Bank in the house of commons. So how could you ever create a campaign to abolish it?

If Gordon Brown suddenly flip-flopped and said he was closing the Bank of England and all national debt is void, they’d lock him up. All the financial goons would want his head on a silver platter. The controlled media would probably spin it as if Gordon was about to destroy the world, and of course the world’s entire economy would feel the reverberations in the beginning.

It won’t be pretty when the system does come down, but we sure as hell cannot rely on our current leaders to do it for us.