The 14 Words

Sunday, 19 February 2012

Myth Or Madness - Race Does Not Exist?


Does this picture make you feel sick? Well it does me!

Whenever a skeleton is found, the Police will call in a specialist Forensic Pathologist, who is able to, amongst other things, identify what race the skeleton belonged to. For example, there are (apparently) 19 identifying structures in a Human skull which can tell a specialist, with a high degree of accuracy, what race that the original owner of the skull belonged to. So, the question is: if race does not exist, why are Forensicist's so good at identifying them?.

loyalwhitebriton

Written by Southwest Nationalist

Race does not exist. That's Deborah Orr's great revelation and conclusion, writing in the Guardian.

"....nationality actually exists, while race, let's face it, doesn't" she says in an article titled "The myth of 'race' was invented by racism, and racism keeps it growing".

We're all one big, happy, human race. Individual races are merely artificial constructs to divide us. Best we just ignore such obvious perils as physiological or intellectual differences, not to mention other inconvenient facts such as certain racial groupings being susceptible to/carrying certain diseases in their genes.

To support this theory, bring on the wisdom of John Barnes. Yes, that John Barnes, the one who was sorely wasted on the football pitch when he should have been writing deep and enlightening treatises on race which would no doubt have revolutionised current thinking.

His gems, quoted in the Guardian article, include "Race is not a scientific reality", and that race was created "by governments, backed by the Church, to validate slavery and colonialism, to justify treating some people as less equal than others".

It's all just a conspiracy to keep a brother down, eh John?.

At any rate, the gist of Deborah Orr's article seems to be that racism created race and that in order to eliminate racism we must desist "from talking as if we accept the racist's idiotic premise, that there's a single soul on the planet of a different "race" to ourselves".

Race, which does not exist, is to be abolished to get rid of the racism which created the racist concept of race. D'oh, there's a confusing mishmash of madness straight out of the idiot liberal handbook.

Tempting as it is to just dismiss all this as the insane rantings of a liberal, it's actually worth considering what would happen if it gained credence. After all that's quite possible in a society hysterical about race, even if it would actually not result in all races being abolished but would be far more selective.

We've been told a lot recently by various mainstream sources that the white race, the indigenous British, don't really exist. We're energetic mongrels, the product of immigration, blah de blah. You don't see any mainstream outlet presenting such dubious and questionable theories as facts about any other racial group, do you?

Our existence, yours and mine, as a racial group is already called into doubt and under attack.

What we'd see with the abolition of race as an accepted reality is the forcing on to white people of the concept that the white race does not exist. Of course it would be executed more subtly than that, but that's what it would amount to. Whites would be expected to lead by example and abolish themselves - as indeed it seems we are doing right now.

Whilst that goes on, we'd still continue spending a fortune promoting the interests of other races in the UK, and they'd still - of course, and quite wisely - continue to wish to remain a race, and seek to further their race and their own interests.

It's easy to see where that ends up - it ends with the end of the white race.

No other race on earth would be as idiotic as to first of all put all other races before its own interest, and then to abolish itself in the interests of some insane equality drive. No race other than us that is, being danced into extinction like a puppet on a string.

Even were Orr's idiot assumptions regarding the non-existence of race utterly true, the end result of adopting them would be the same - no race other than us would be idiotic or suicidal enough to delete itself from existence in the name of some mono-racial world where race and racism are to be eradicated in some horrendous melting pot which, if realised, would destroy all peoples.

We'd abolish ourselves, and that vacuum would be seized upon and occupied by another racial group with more sense, and less crazed liberal ideas than those which have been foisted on us. Then again it could well be that this is the true goal, ably assisted by useful idiot white liberals like Deborah Orr.


Read more...


Hardons comment:

Race mixing between Caucasians and Negroes is tantamount to bestiality. 

Would you be happy if your daughter married the guy on the right? To produce half-caste kids and destroy your genetic code which took thousands of years to develop. No of course you wouldn't unless you were one of 'Gods chosen ones' that adheres to fact that this is all part of the plan.

The children of such unions have no real identity or belonging, they are lost, in some ways they are the victims of this vile NWO experiment.

Make NO mistake they want a world of 'Mud' slaves to serve the super rich that sit in judgement in their Ivory Towers, they do not want any racial identity among the masses, no National Pride just a hoard of of 'muds' that will shortly become slaves to them.

You thought you had problems when they mass induced Indians and Pakistani's into Britain? Well that was just the beginning, now they are flooding our country with Somalians and other sub-human species from the continent of Africa to finally wipe the White race out. 

Its no good blaming the worthless arse holes that come here tempted by our glorious Benefits System that is slanted in their favour while true Brits suffer, its all part of the plan. Anyone that votes Lib/Lab/Con is prescribing  their own destruction.

John Hardon

Staring into the abyss

Inside a despairing Greek nation where families queue at soup kitchens and women threaten to jump to their deaths as job losses mount

When Eleni Nikolaidou agreed to help a university research project, she was asked to plough through 6,000 newspapers from World War II.

Life was so difficult for the Greeks under Nazi occupation, she discovered, that papers printed ‘Recipes for Hunger’ on their front pages to help readers survive the deprivations of a dark chapter in history.

These included recipes for fried radishes and greens scavenged from parks, along with tips such as grating an aubergine on top of boiled rice to give the look of meat.


One item especially disturbed her: a suggestion that families collect the crumbs from their table after eating to make into a meal at the end of the week. ‘These were terrible times and thousands died of hunger, especially in Athens,’ said Nikolaidou, who is also a teacher. ‘But it struck me as outrageous that people were so hungry they had to keep the crumbs from their table to survive.’ She was so moved she turned her research into a book, reprinting many of the recipes and suggestions. To her surprise Starvation Recipes has become a big hit — a chilling symbol of the stark times confronting Greece once again.

What is so shockingly evident as you walk around Athens are the awful parallels between that war-time era and today. The soup kitchens, the beggars, the pensioners picking up discarded vegetables after street markets close, the homeless scavenging for food in bins. These are the signs that can be seen.

Less noticeable is the quiet desperation of dignified people who turn off heating despite the cold and share dwindling savings with jobless relatives. Or the workers unable to afford fares home and the children fainting in school from hunger.


It is three years since the financial tsunami struck Greece with dreadful force, exposing the most shocking example of a country living beyond its means. Three years of savage austerity — of sudden new taxes, salary cuts, job losses, rising prices and falling demand — have left the nation shattered and its citizens locked in a spiral of despair.

‘There are so many similarities between these periods,’ said Nikolaidou. ‘Of course, it was the Germans then, and once again the Germans are the dominant figures in our crisis now.’

Greeks seem torn between outrage at their venal politicians, anxiety over the future and the fierce anger they direct at Germany for demanding tough measures as the price of a European Union bailout to allow their country to continue to function.



Anguish: A police officer escorts a relative of Lambrousi Harikleia who was threatening to jump from an office block

The imposition of the latest package of conditions by the German-dominated EU and International Monetary Fund provoked riots last weekend, while newspapers made ugly references to the Nazis, and politicians talked of living under a ‘German jackboot’ as Europe’s festering wounds burst open.

Greece’s EU-imposed, unelected government has backed another devastating cutback in their economy — slashing the minimum wage, savaging welfare payments, sacking one-fifth of state workers — but many fear this is just one more chapter in a long-running tragedy.

It is only eight months since a previous package of austerity measures was supposed to solve everything. On the streets, people debate whether Greece should accept this latest deal or default on its debts and leave the euro, with all the devastating repercussions a return to the drachma would bring. They are damned whatever they do. Only one thing is certain: this nation of 11 million people is being slowly crucified on the cross of its adherence to the single currency.

It does not take long to discover the depth of the pain. Walking near Omonia Square, a central shopping area in Athens, I came across a large crowd. A man was pointing to a balcony three storeys up on an office block, where I could see the dangling legs of a distraught woman who was threatening to jump.


European Super State One Step Closer or Approaching Imminent Collapse?

Jean Monet, the founding father of the European Union, had a very particular vision of Europe's future back in 1952, and he expressed it in a letter to a colleague on 30th April that year: 

“Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”

Here, in a nutshell, we plainly see the trickery that stands behind the fabricated 'Union' of individual nations, each of which was led to believe that its economic and social stability would prosper once it committed to the 'common market' and the various treaties which mark its inexorable passage to 'superstate'.

The actual mission of the founders of the EU has always been something of a chimera; Monet's letter makes it clear however, that the motivation was both idealistic and elitist. The supranational entity was to be created “without (their) people understanding what was happening” following a pattern of elitist oligarchical ambition stretching back through past dynasties.


We can trace the roots of this latest 'superstate' experiment to the Schuman Plan of 1951, which was signed up to by six countries and took the form of a treaty (The Treaty of Paris) centred around coal and steel industries being placed under common management, ostensibly to prevent any recurrence of the death and destruction of the second World War. Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg were the signaturies to this treaty whose empirical purpose was stated to be ensuring that none of these countries could ever again manufacture weapons of war to be used against the other.

Then in 1957, the same six countries expanded cooperation to other economic sectors and signedThe Treaty of Rome. Thus creating the 'European Economic Community' also known as The Common Market. The UK joined up to this in 1973 under Mrs Thatcher.

The formal creation of the European Union, under the guidance of Jaques Delors, didn't occur until February 1992 under the Maastricht Treaty. It formalised the introduction of the European Parliament and European Commission, the latter gaining considerable 'management power' under Jaques Santer, its first president. Interestingly, the Commission was originally to be named “The High Authority”, which has strongly Masonic overtones. But this name was dropped in the 1960's.

The single currency (Euro) element of the expanding Union was launched in 1999, along with the European Central Bank. Lastly came the Lisbon Treaty of December 2009 which created the new post of President of the European Council.


Zombify to Unify: 'Euro schools pour propaganda brainwash'

Preserving Human Diversity and Freedom! - Dr David Duke

The Innocents Killed by Obama: They Never Saw it Coming


It's probably too much to ask an unrepentant murderer to speak the truth or show compassion, but even among murderers, the following video is a staggering example of having zero empathy. Even the warmongering Brookings Institution has concluded that there are 10 civilians killed to every 1 "militant" in Pakistan alone. Obama denies this, and a range of other documented evidence, when he states that only "precision strikes against al Qaeda and their affiliates" are undertaken. Then, listen as Obama makes a joke to the Jonas Brothers about being potential suitors for his own daughters. He says, "Boys, don't get any ideas. I have two words for ya' -- Predator Drones." I wonder if the family and who lost their daughter, or the community bombed in this video, would smirk quite the same as he.

US Is Being Conditioned For War On Iran

The staging of yet another war: We are what we claimed we despised

We are being preconditioned for another war of aggression, this time against Iran. We are being systematically deceived into thinking that Iran is now out to get us. Maybe they are…now. Let me see, we have cut off major food supplies, put a wrench in their banking system and messed up their economy, and have positioned several of our warships in the Straights of Hormuz showing them that we are a clear and present danger to their continued existence. They might just be upset with us. Ya think?

Announcements on cable news shows and subsequent statements by US officials claim that Israel is contemplating attacking Iran this spring some time. These statements are issued with a casualness of announcing a garden party. For some reason it is unacceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons, but quite alright for Israel to have more than 200 bunker buster mini nukes at their disposal provided to them by our government.

Three days after the initial announcement of this preplanned war of aggression in MSM venues, newspaper headlines across the country claimed “Iran planning attacks inside the US”. Personally, I believe that this is just advanced warning that future false flag attacks, perpetrated by the CIA on behalf of global interests will occur in the US. Of course, Iran will be blamed immediately, we’ll blow them off the map and ten years from now we’ll find out the whole thing was rigged and based on fictional events that never happened; at least not by the people we thought caused them. Don’t worry though. There will never be an honest investigation, no charges will ever be filed against those who really did attack us, and evidence will be destroyed faster than you can strike a match.

But we sold Israel those nukes and once the weapons were delivered, the stage was set.


THE INSANE WORLD OF ZOG (Zionist Organised Government)

A man freak thought to be Britain's first 'male mother' has told of his wish to live his life as a normal father.

The man, who was born a woman, gave birth to a healthy baby girl he calls his 'little angel' in March 2011 after ending the hormone treatment that had deactivated his womb.

He had been living as a man for five years and had legally changed his name and gender before deciding to attempt to conceive with his male partner, from whom he is now separated.


It is thought to be only the fourth case of its kind in the world, and comes four years after American transsexual Thomas Beatie, 38, sparked controversy by announcing his pregnancy. The Mail on Sunday knows the identity of the man but at his request is not going to reveal the details and will refer to him as 'Bob', which is not his real name.

Pictures of the little girl, seen by this newspaper, reveal a happy and beautiful baby with sparkling eyes and a beaming smile. A reporter spoke to Bob yesterday at his comfortable mid-terrace home in a residential area of a town in the North of England where he opened the door with his daughter cradled in his arms.


With short dark hair and a faint moustache, and wearing jeans, a blue polo shirt and sports trainers, Bob confirmed he had given birth to the little girl last year. He said: 'It's not something I want to become famous for. I don't want everyone to know that I'm transgender.'

Asked if he would speak to The Mail on Sunday about his experiences, he said: 'I would certainly want to help people in an anonymous capacity but I wouldn't want to become famous for that, I wouldn't want to be known like Thomas Beatie. And I have to think of my daughter and I don't think it would be good for her.'


The university graduate, 27, was in a gay relationship with another man. They parted recently and he is raising his child as a single parent. He requested anonymity because his history as a woman is not known to many of his friends, and he is reluctant to be labelled a transsexual parent because he identifies with being male.

His little girl, now 11 months old, is his biological daughter and was conceived using his own eggs. She is said to call him 'Dada' and Bob told The Mail on Sunday that he refers to his former partner as her 'other Daddy'.

The details of his case emerged in a fascinating and poignant blog written by Bob which charts the early days of his pregnancy and later announces the birth. In his first post, dated July 16, 2010, he writes of his excitement after taking a pregnancy test. Bob wrote: 

'I put it to one side while I checked my messages and then glanced over to see what it said, prepared to be disappointed. Not today. It said pregnant. As clear as anything, it said pregnant. I read it and re-read it, gave a cry of delight and rushed into the bedroom to tell my partner. I'm so thrilled, so excited, so apprehensive.
'I'm not the first man to have a baby and I won't be the last, but we're not fully accepted and understood yet, there's still a long way to go. But if there's one thing I've learned on my journey from being a girl to being a man, it's patience.'
A picture of his positive pregnancy test is also proudly displayed online. It is not clear how much surgery – if any – Bob had during the treatment to change his gender. But he refers to having taken male hormones in order to make the transition, which set in motion irreversible changes, including deepening the voice and increasing the amount and distribution of body hair.

Patients' lives will be at risk during Olympics


Olympic Road Network: This map highlights some of the roads in London which are expected to be given fast lanes, to help VIPs by pass congestion on the roads

Ambulances carrying the sick and vulnerable will be left stranded in traffic jams during the Olympics while dignitaries beat congestion with 'Games lanes' reserved for VIPs. Organisers for the London Games rejected a request from NHS London to let ambulances use the new fast lanes and have now been accused of risking patients' lives.

The lanes, which will be implemented across 39 miles of road in central London, will allow 80,000 accredited members of the ‘Olympic family’, including athletes, officials and sponsors to by-pass congestion on the busy roads.

Meanwhile ambulances will only be allowed in the lanes if they have their blue lights on. Blue lights can only be switched on by those specifically trained to do so and are only used in genuine emergencies and Leah Bevington, head of communications at Medical Services said this was totally unacceptable.


Rape is normal and part of being accepted into a group


Street gang girls will risk being raped in return for their membership of a group - according to a reformed woman gangster. Isha Nembhard, former member of an 80-strong gang in Peckham, south London, said being sexually abused when associating with male gangs was becoming normalised for many young woman. The 20-year-old said: 'It is about low self esteem and a craving for attention. Even if they know it's wrong, they will do it to get acceptance.'

Speaking to The Observer, she added: 'A lot of girls are sort of prostituting themselves to have sexual relationships within a gang and get treated in a bad way. For example, she might know about what happens to girls in the gang but sleeps with all of them just for the status.'

Nembhard said even after a girl has been abused, many maintain sexual relationships with the gang members because they feel they can not do better. She added young women are more girly now then when she was a teenager and more are becoming sexually active before they turn 16.

UK: Boy, 7, branded a racist

The mother of a seven-year-old boy was told to sign a school form admitting he was racist after he asked another pupil about the colour of his skin.

Elliott Dearlove had asked a five-year-old boy in the playground whether he was ‘brown because he was from Africa’.

His mother, Hayley White, 29, said she received a phone call last month to say her son had been at the centre of a ‘racist incident’.

She was then summoned to a meeting with Elliott, his teacher and the deputy head of Griffin Primary School in Hull.


Ms White, an NHS healthcare assistant, said: 
‘When I arrived at the school and asked Elliott what had happened, he became extremely upset. He kept saying to me, “I was just asking a question. I didn’t mean it to be nasty” and he was extremely distressed by it all.’
Ms White claimed she was asked at the meeting to read a copy of the school rules and in particular its zero-tolerance policy on racism. 
‘I was told I would have to sign a form acknowledging my son had made a racist remark which would be submitted to the local education authority for further investigation,’ she said. I refused to sign it and I told the teacher in no way did I agree the comment was racist. My son is inquisitive. He always likes to ask questions, but that doesn’t make him a racist.’
The school had launched an investigation after the younger boy told his mother about Elliott’s comment and she complained. Ms White, who lives in a three-bedroom house with her son and nine-year-old daughter Olivia, has now applied to have Elliott moved from the school. She claimed she was told there were places at nearby Thanet Primary School, but the council informed her last Friday that this was not the case.


These Savages call themselves 'BRITISH'


Police in Germany are considering charges of grievous bodily harm against British boxer Dereck Chisora following his bloody brawl with rival UK fighter David Haye.

A Munich police spokesman said Chisora, who last night lost to Ukrainian Vitali Klitschko on a points decision, was taken from the city's airport this morning to police headquarters in Munich for questioning. His trainer Don Charles was also being questioned as part of the official investigation into the post-bout incident.

It follows ugly scenes last night when the two heavyweight boxers brawled with each other in the Olympiahalle, Munich.

The spokesman confirmed that police were still searching for Haye, who was not present at the hotel when they sought to question him this morning. They now believe he may have left the city at 6.00am before they had a chance to speak with him.

Police said they are scrutinising videotapes from the fight to try to determine what happened and if other people should be prosecuted. A police spokesman said: 

'Police picked up Mr Chisora at the airport at approximately 10.30am (German time) and are bringing him in for the investigation. They also picked up Mr Chisora's trainer for questioning. The police went to the hotel to speak to them but we had been informed they had just checked out.
'At present we do not know where Mr Haye is. We are currently looking for him. He was not at the hotel this morning and we have not seen him at the airport.'
The police spokesman said the investigation was 'only at the very initial stages' and said there had been no arrests following the bloody brawl. The brawl began after Chisora allegedly mocked Haye for his poor performance against Klitschko's brother Wladimir last year and tried to goad his rival into a future bout.

Read more...

Haye vs Chisora Fight Video from Munich Presser - Full video

Homeless? We'll send you to Hull - Government Source


Homeless people in London could be sent as far a way as Hull because of a lack of private accommodation in the capital. That is according to housing charities who fear new government legislation will result in a mass exodus of those on the bottom rungs of the housing ladder to areas with cheaper rents. The coalition's Localism Act, which is due to be enforced in the spring, enables local authorities to place those without a home in privately rented accommodation.

And Croydon Council is already seeking accommodation in Hull and other Yorkshire towns to rehouse their homeless, with other boroughs expected to follow suit. 

Speaking to The Observer, Campbell Robb, chief executive of housing charity Shelter, said 
'The fact that councils may be considering making use of these powers to offer people homes away from their local areas - potentially having to uproot families from schools, communities and jobs - is testament to the scale of the housing crisis. This upheaval could have a devastating impact on the children's education and a family's well being. Taking families away from their support networks at a time when they need them most is not going to help them back on their feet.'
According to the Localism Act authorities have a duty to find suitable accommodation for people who are homeless, are occupying insanitary or overcrowded housing or need to move on medical or welfare grounds.

How a Welshman deals with the TV Licence creatures

Written by Green Arrow


I see that TaffMasterFlash has posted a new video on his youtube channel, showing just how to deal with those smarmy creatures who try to extort money from decent people by claiming that you must have a TV Licence to watch television - some people still do by all accounts.

For those of you interested in talking to TaffMasterFlash, who is a one man army when it comes to taking on The Establishment, you can usually find him in the British Resistance paltalk room. Well done Taff.

If you want a step by step guide on just how to deal with these government gangsters, then you should go to The People's United Community site and read their instructions here. Enjoy the video - One up for the Good Guys.



Like I said. Well done Taff.

The Military are fucking Idiot Puppets...

FUCK THE NWO

Saturday, 18 February 2012

Iran Nuclear Coverage Echoes Iraq War Media Frenzy


NEW YORK -- Military strikes expected! Weapons inspectors called in! A murky al Qaeda connection! And Cheney says time's up for Ira...

Wait. Haven't we seen this movie before?

It's already been a decade since the media hyped bogus WMD claims prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq. But it sure feels like 2002 for anyone who was around then and is now scanning newspaper headlines or watching TV talking-heads discuss a possible Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities -- an act which could pull the U.S. into another thorny Middle East military conflict.

Some of the media's more overheated Iran coverage bears an eerie resemblance to Iraq coverage, but instead of former Vice President Dick Cheney we have his daughter Liz Cheney making the Sunday show rounds.

"A nuclear weapon in the hands of the world's worst sponsor of terror, one of them, is something we can't stand for," Cheney said Sunday on ABC's "This Week."

The Iran nuclear story has also led several network newscasts this week. On Tuesday, ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer talked of a "shadow war being waged by Iran," followed by chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross describing a "violent series of attacks by Iran," which may be retaliation for the recent killing of Iranian scientists.

CBS News anchor Scott Pelley kicked off Wednesday's broadcast by saying that Iran is "defying the world," while NBC's Brian Williams asked if "the U.S. about to get dragged into a new confrontation."

One national security reporter, who has covered the intelligence community and Iran but was not authorized to comment, says that pre-Iraq War coverage and recent Iran coverage are "terrifyingly similar."

"I don't think we are falling totally back into where we were before, but I do think you're seeing, in some corners of our profession, we're making the same mistakes we made a decade ago," the reporter said. "We're taking things at face value and we're rushing to get ahead of a story that we don't know where it's going."

While questions have loomed for years about Iran's nuclear intentions and ability to produce weapons-grade uranium, we're now in the midst of a full-scale flood of stories suggesting that Iran is on track to build a nuclear bomb, and even some speculating that the Iranian regime may strike the United States, perhaps in collusion with terrorists.


POLICE STATE AMERICA

Police Shoot Unarmed 54 yr old Woman for Rolling Up Her Car Window

Bank of England, City of London and The Queen


One of the greatest deceptions in modern times is that the quaint little old Queen of England has no power and her role is purely ceremonial and for tradition. The fact is her role has not changed at all; just most of the Royal Family’s evil plans for world empire were hatched a long time ago in the old world. The British empire is still going strong, her common ancestors are in control of the US and the new world order. Now her majesty can sit back in her palace, relax and watch the world fall to bits, while the media paints a warm fuzzy picture of the family; who are in fact Nazi Germans.

The Queen is still Head of State and meets with important leaders from all around the world. One would assume they don’t talk about knitting or her pet corgis. Each day she receives documents and reports from Government ministers and Commonwealth officials. They must all be read and, if necessary, signed. So she is well aware of her country’s current affairs. She is also Head of the Armed Forces and is the only person that can declare war. Of course she meets with the prime-minister first, but it is still her duty and only hers.



On top of this she is Head of the Church of England. She appoints the archbishops and bishops; on what basis we can only imagine. In other words because she is the offspring of incestuous ancestors she is allowed to rule over people’s realtionship with God, just like the Pharaohs. It’s there in writing. “Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”. If God really did grace her with this position it would be nice to see the contract.

You don’t get any more elite in social circles than the Queen. The rich and powerful are just begging to be blessed with her astronomically wealthy presence. Tradition or not, Queenie is no innocent in anything. Somebody that asks for an extra £44m allowance during recession does not care about their people.

So where does her power end and the Government’s begin? Well the Government puppets do all the dirty work and the Queen signs the papers for the Government. Although she has more power than the majority believe, there is an even bigger power above both of these puppets. You guessed it, the private banking cartels that have a grip over the nation’s money. The Queen is fine, she is the richest land owner in the world and the bankers will always keep it that way; they have her family to thank for where they are today. The rest of us are not so lucky.


The Rothschild banking family is one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful family in the world; who rose to domination through the art of money changing. Money is the root cause of all evil; they are the route cause of all modern money!

Similar to Vatican City controlled by the Pope in Rome (another God appointed money hoarder), there is an independent state within London, known as the City of London. It is the richest square mile in the world, and London’s financial sector, housing banks and financial institutions from all major countries. The Governors of the city are called The Crown (deceptively nothing to do with the Queen), comprised of 13 members headed up by the Lord Mayor of the city (not the regular London Mayor). Today Ian Luder (of German decent like the Queen) is the allusive Lord Mayor, yet there is very little written of him online and his Wikipedia page is virtually empty. That’s because he wields incomprehensible power for the elites by manipulation of the economy.


The City of London is not part of England or the United Kingdom. It is a privately owned corporation masquerading as a county – often talking heads on TV will even call it London PLC. It isn’t under the power of the Queen or the Government. Her majesty and the Prime Minister are subordinate to the Lord Mayor and have to listen to him and his delegates on financial decisions; that is why during the financial news they always cut to “the City” for updates. If the Queen enters the Mayor’s city, she is met by him at the perimeter “Temple Bar”and must bow and ask permission to enter his private and sovereign state. He will dress in full regalia while she and her handlers dress in regular clothing. Get the idea? Even the old world Queen is a peasant to the new world order bankers. The city also has the pleasure of their own private police force, which is full of freemasons.

Along with the Rothschild family and their agents placed in various positions of financial power this secret mafia steer the world’s economy through the Bank of England, NM Rothschild & Sons and their web of private banks in all major nations. When an economic crash occurs it has most definitely been ordered from the City or across the pond by their associates at the Federal Reserve and Wall Street.

During a war you will never see the Vatican, City of London or Switzerland get attacked. On the grand chessboard these are considered neutral ground because it is where all the money flows. Without money to fund war, there is no war. Sitting somewhere in an ivory tower are the Rothschilds laughing at our stupidity. This happens right beneath our own noses!


While the Queen and her Government have control over our every day lives, our increasingly fascist laws and the issues that seem to directly affect us. The Rothschild family, the Lord Mayor, the financial City of London and WallStreet privately operate our currency and financial affairs, the real controller of our lives. We are in economic collapse, now you know where to look.

Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown “slave” colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful.

During the development of this two tiered British Empire the BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY (BEIC) owned by the CROWN began making a fortune through the Opium trade. One of their strategies was to get the vast impoverished Chinese population addicted to opium to create a mass market for the crop, while they also milked their exports at the same time. It didn’t matter to the Crown that China outlawed the drug. They wanted money and money they got.

The Royal Family also wanted their greedy claws on the profits so joined their counterparts in the CITY and negotiated a tax on the opium farmers in there Indian colony. Thus huge amounts of opium were shipped from India at a tax to China and the Royal Family added an enormous amount of money to their every increasing pot. Slaves in India produced the opium and gave them a cut for nothing, and impoverished laborers in China bought it to smoke while picking tea leaves for export back to Britain. Next time you pick up a box of teabags with the endorsement stamp “By appointment to Her Majesty the Queen”, spare a second for our Chinese neighbors.



The British Empire fighting China during the opium wars.

Now this was the 19th Century, not modern times, but over the years the operation became more sophisticated and secretive. Whole banks were created to launder the money, shipping companies were made to help hide the contents, and the corrupt institutions that are based out of the City of London and extend all over the globe still interface for world control and financial rule. From Bush’s Union Banking Corporation in America laundering Hitler’s finances, to the controlled collapse of the world’s economy in order to pool our tangible wealth, the bankers have always operated above the law, the state and modern royals.

The British may have had an enormous military empire in all corners of the globe, but the Crown and the City of London had their own economic empire that rules to this day. And that Empire started with the Bank of England.


Bank of England:


The Bank of England and its monstrous ancient temple of a building is the template for all big central banks that wish to perpetuate the global scam. Located in the private City of London the counterfeiting operation opened its doors in 1694 as an easy way for the Government to create finance. It was only later that the Rothschilds infiltrated the institution. The initial idea came from Scottish money changer William Paterson who some researchers claim was an initiate in to the Order of the Orange, a Merovingian Bloodline secret society developed by Dutch Freemason William of Orange.

Britain found it hard to find lenders with enough capital to meet their greed and warmongering debt issues, so when Paterson came along with a £1.2m loan they were more than happy to give him and his partners the exclusive rights to print the nation’s money and to continue loaning them money thereafter. Seemingly ignorant to the consequences of becoming indebted to private hands, Paterson was granted a 12 year charter, and thus the unethical monopoly London had over currency was now legally in the hands of Paterson…because they said so. Any independent free market bankers and traders would now lose out to the money changers.

While the royals used loans to extend the empire by force, the Bank used its economics to extend an empire by money and it wouldn’t take long for Britain to amass a dangerous level of national debt. It would increase every year and by 1844 the government owed the banksters over £11m. The original charter stated that after each term the government could sever ties with the bankers and go about their own issuance of currency, but because debt expanded each year under the weight of the system, they were hooked on a never ending fishing line of credit. It was eventually agreed that the bank could hold the monopoly until the government had paid them back. They have never come close to doing so, hence the ever increasing national debt and global private banking control today. Taxation goes to pay off the debt, not to fund public services.

Why does the Government allow this to go ahead, can’t they just tell them where to go?

Unfortunately it’s not that simple. The tentacles that the private banking cartels have spread around the globe are so interconnected with the entire economy and power structure that the Governments that are now in power are only puppets to the banks. There aren’t any true leaders left and probably very few that understand the system. After all they are more than happy to skim off the top in their expense accounts as hit the headlines in 2009. Gordon Brown the Prime Minister of England as of writing, granted the Bank of England operational independence to set interest rates in 1997 and sold all of the country’s gold overseas at knockdown prices before the economic crisis. You can see that they don’t much care about the situation.



Gordon Brown gave free reign to the Bank of England to set interest rates in 1997, now since the crash he is calling for a New World Order for the economy; coincidence?

You then have to factor in laws that have been developed over the years to accommodate the banking scam. You’re not even allowed to talk about the Bank in the house of commons. So how could you ever create a campaign to abolish it?

If Gordon Brown suddenly flip-flopped and said he was closing the Bank of England and all national debt is void, they’d lock him up. All the financial goons would want his head on a silver platter. The controlled media would probably spin it as if Gordon was about to destroy the world, and of course the world’s entire economy would feel the reverberations in the beginning.

It won’t be pretty when the system does come down, but we sure as hell cannot rely on our current leaders to do it for us.


Jubilee 2012 The House of Rothschild


Evelyn Rothschild was in a New York hotel on 9/11 – seemingly watching from his Ivory tower.

1. The Grand Vizier.

Similar to the structure of government in ancient Egypt, consisting of a step pyramid model with the grand viziers and priesthood one step below the pharaoh, today's monarchy reigns using a much more sophisticated pyramid model of authority.

Like the pharaohs of Egypt who had a grand vizier, QE2 also has a grand vizier who serves as her most trusted advisor. His name is lord Evelyn Rothschild and he is the second wealthiest and most powerful person on earth. He is also lord of the world's financial capitol, the City State of London. Lord Rothschild and his ring of power hide their identities behind 13 City Council members who stand in as their representatives.

Just how rich and powerful is lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically, the Rothschild family wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschild's secret financial records are never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled. But researchers estimate their wealth at close to 500 trillion dollars – more than half the wealth of the entire world.

Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, race horses and exotic resorts, the Rothschild's bought Routers in the 1800's. Routers then bought the Associated Press, which selects and delivers the same new stories to the entire world, day after day. They have controlling interests in three major television networks and easily avoid media attention, since they own the media.

Until recently, they owned and operated England's Royal Mint and continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct. They control the LBMA – London Bullion Market Association, where 30 to 40 million ounces of gold, worth over 11 billion dollars are traded daily. The Rothschild's earn millions weekly, just on transaction fees alone. They also fix the world price on gold on a daily basis and profit from its ups and downs.

Over the centuries, the Rothschild's have amassed trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world's gold supply. They own controlling interests in the worlds largest oil company Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and off-shore banking services where the wealth of the Vatican and black nobility is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts and holding companies.

Although Evelyn Rothschild may seem like a harmless old man, make no mistake about it. Rothschild and his ancestors have hand-picked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of millions.

The wealth hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe and shelter every human being on Earth.

How did Evelyn Rothschild become the filthy rich grand vizier to QE2 and godfather of the black nobility? By birth. Evelyn Rothschild is the great, great, great grandson of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, and will be passing the godfather-ship down to David de Rothschild.


2. Mayer Amschel Bauer.

Their story begins in 18th century Frankfurt Germany, on a cobblestone street called Frankfurt on the Main. Mayer Amschel Bauer was the son of a goldsmith and loan-shark, called Moses Amschel Bauer, who hung a red hexagon shield over the doorway of his shop. When Mayer took over his father's business, he changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild, which means “Red Shield” in German. The red hexagon shield was the symbol for the world revolutionary movement.

Family biographers describe Mayer Rothschild as a poor man, who lived with his family above his shop and sold rare coins to Royal customers. On the contrary, Mayer stashed a big supply of gold, precious coins and jewels in special hiding places inside his house.

One special hiding place was beneath the back courtyard, where he accessed his strongbox, through an underground passageway. Mayer taught his 5 sons the tricks of the trade. To them he wasn't just his father, he was their lord and master. To them, he was Lord Mayer.


3. The Birth of the Illuminati and the New World Order Conspiracy.

In 1773, Mayer Rothschild invited 12 wealthy revolutionary-minded men to his goldsmiths shop. Together they formulated a plan to seize control of the worlds wealth. They made a pact to secretly pool their wealth to bankrupt the nations of the world and create a New World Order.

Using his connections, Mayer teamed up with prince Wilhelm IX Landgrave, who was the ruler of Germany's Hesse-Kassel district. Wilhelm had a reputation as a cold-blooded loan-shark, who trained and rented out his Hessian solders as mercenary troops.

It was a popular blood for money business which made prince Wilhelm one of Europe's richest men. Working as prince Wilhelm's agent, Mayer Rothschild collected fees for each dead Hessian solder killed on he battle-field. He hired his sons to help him collect the blood money from renter nations. Since wars were good for the rent-a-troop business, prince Wilhelm used his Royal connections in Denmark and England to provoke these wars.

King George the 3rd. of England rented Hessian solders from Mayer Rothschild and prince Wilhelm to fight the American colonists. American colonists had already shot down millions of American Indians, whose spears and arrows were useless against the deadly gunfire. The worst holocaust in human history occurred not in Nazi Germany but on American soil.

By 1776 British and Hessian troops arrived on American shores, ready to fight the American colonists. The colonists won their independence and Mayer Rothschild won his blood money from the heads of each and every Hessian solder killed on the battle-field.

Back in Europe, Napoleon with his mighty French army, became master of Europe. When Napoleon and his troops marched into Germany, Wilhelm feared for his life and his vast fortune. He left 3 million dollars in the hands of Mayer Rothschild to pay the Hessian solders. Then he escaped to Denmark to stay with his royal relatives.

Mayer Rothschild received a stock-market tip from his world revolutionary network. Instead of paying the Hessian solders with the 3 million dollars that was left to him by Wilhelm, he bet the money on his insider stock market tip.

With his new fortune, Mayer Rothschild set up 5 family banks to be run by each of his 5 sons in London, Paris, Naples, Frankfurt and Vienna.

On Sept. 19th 1812, Mayer Rothschild died at the age of 68. He left instruction that the amount of the inheritance must never be made public, that secrecy and ruthlessness must be used in all business practices and that family members must intermarry with their own relatives to keep the family fortune all in the same family.

All 5 brothers dedicated themselves to their ancestor's world revolutionary dream. That dream was to control the entire world under One World Government.

Mayer Rothschild's most successful sons were Nathan, who ran the London bank, and James who ran the Paris bank. Together they changed the face of history and became known throughout Europe as the Demon Brothers. Their father had given them a detailed NWO plan for world control. Adam Weishaupt wrote and completed the plan on May 1, 1776 with Rothschild financing. It was a futuristic plan that would put NWO members over the next century into political power positions.

It was a plan to divide and conquer the nations of the world, by provoking war then profiting from war loans and sales of weapons to both sides. Exhausted by war, terror and chaos, humanity would eventually bow-down to One World ruler and One World army as a solution.

It was a plan to control public opinion, by purchasing controlling shares in newspaper houses, TV networks, publishing houses and film studios.

Sports, games and alcohol would be used to distract the masses. Laws would be changed, banks would be monopolized and people and nations would be made into obedient debt-slaves.

With Rothschild financing, Adam Weishaupt formed a secret world revolutionary group called the Illuminati. He recruited thousands of influential members by convincing them that only men of superior ability had the right to rule over the ignorant masses.

French police exposed the plan, when they found documents on an Illuminati courier who was struck by lightening while traveling from Germany to France.

The Illuminati was forced underground. They took refuge with the Freemasons.


4. Taking control of the Bank of England.

Nathan and James Rothschild had come up with a scheme that would put the Illuminati plan for world domination into action. It would also make them filthy rich.

The brothers helped finance both sides of Napoleon's famous battle at Waterloo, between the French and the English.

With advanced knowledge of the British victory, Nathan Rothschild spread lies that the British had been defeated, which caused a crash in the value of British Government bonds. While panicked English investors sold up their life savings, Nathan Rothschild bought-up their bonds for pennies on the dollar.

When official news of the British victory at Waterloo arrived, the English bond-market skyrocketed and so did Nathan Rothschild's wealth.

In one foul swoop, the Demon Brothers had double-crossed the English masses and taken control of the Bank of England.

Flaunting their tremendous wealth, the brothers went on a lavish spending spree. They bought mansions, fashionable clothes and hosted extravagant parties.


5. International Banks and Multinational Corporations.

By 1818 they had fleeced the French investors, by crashing the French Government bond market.

According to plan, the brothers formed the first International bank and named it M. Rothschild and Sons.

The pope became their most famous customer. The Catholic Church which had financed the wholesale slaughter, torture and looting of hundreds of thousands of Muslims during the Christian Crusades, were now doing business with the Demon Brothers.

By 1823 the Rothschilds were guardians of the entire papal treasure and took over the financial operations of the Catholic Church.

Enraged citizens accused the Rothschilds of trying to control the world's money markets. Fearing for their lives, the Rothschilds retreated into the shadows and cast their eyes on the youthful USA. To avoid publicity, the Rothschilds made themselves invisible by creating and hiding behind two front companies. J P Morgan and Kuhn and Loeb.

By 1906 J P Morgan's bank controlled 1/3 of America's railways and over 70% of the steel industry. He eventually had a major stake in the 20th. century’s major companies. Among them ATNT, ITT, General Electric, General Motors and Du Pont.


6. The Opium trade with China.

The Rothschilds bought controlling interests in British East India Shipping Company and the illegal Opium trade with China. They offered junior partnerships to New England's leading American families.

The Russell, Coolidge, DeLeino, Forbes and Perkins families became fabulously rich smuggling Opium aboard their speedy Clipper ships into China. In 1820 Samuel Russell bought out the Perkins syndicate and ran the Opium smuggling operation with his partner Warren DeLeino Jr. who was the grandfather of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Britain had finally found a commodity that China would take – Opium. Imported from India, just a few chests at first, and then thousands. When the Chinese authorities tried to stop the Opium trade, the British sent in their Gunboats. After nearly 20 years of turmoil the treaty of Tien-Tsin in 1858 not only allowed Opium to be imported, but handed over China's ports and all her International trade to Western control.

After the war, Opium poured into China on an even greater scale and her Emperors were powerless to stop it.

In 1842, the British stole Hong Kong from China in an Opium drug-deal called the treaty of Nanking. The Russell family who controlled the US arm of the Rothschild drug smuggling operation, set up the Skull and Bones fraternity at Yale University. America's big money families formed the fraternity's inner power circle. Taft, Russell, Schiff, Haremon, Bush, Warburg, Guggenheim, Rockefeller, Stemson, Weighouser, Vanderbilt, Goodyear and Pillsbury were all members.

These families intermarried over the generations to form America's big money aristocracy. Skull and bones member Alfonso Taft catapulted his son William Taft right into the top job at the White House. President Taft's 17th. Amendment to the US Constitution guaranteed the right of big-money insiders to hand-pick Senators and buy control of the US Senate. Today, the most influential members of the CIA, the US Government, and big finance are Skull and Bones men.

The Hollywood movie lots are owned by the Illuminati Lehman brothers, Rothschild agent Kuhn and Loeb and Goldman Sacks.


How Quickly We Forgot

By Jim Kirwan

When 911 happened the people of this country demanded answers. What we got instead of ‘ANSWERS’ was something both unexpected and totally unnecessary: That ’something’ was called The US Department of HOMELAND Security.

And from that day to this, DHS has been a colossal FRAUD and as ‘security’ goes a complete and utter failure.

When “the Decider” was questioned about 911 he answered by explaining that ‘America would never let anyone do to the United States anything that could “hurt us.” And that basically the United States was far too strong to ever be harmed by a bunch of terrorists.’ 

Looks like he was right—because he and his buddies in Israel did 911 and in the aftermath the United States has been nearly totally destroyed. At the heart of this destruction HOMELAND SECURITY has always played a massive and invasive role in the destruction of the US Constitution as well as in the take-down of so many American Industries that it is almost difficult to remember. 

We used to have an automotive industry, and we used to be able to fly, anywhere with ease. We had a manufacturing base that was the envy of the world—but now all that we “manufacture” is garbage and lies. Yesterday it was announced that DHS now wants an additional $32 Billion to pay for its continuing sexual and sociological invasions into the lives of every person that still tries to fly. Foreigners did not do this to us—we allowed this to be done to ourselves in the name of an ever greater amount of false-flag-security that we purchased by giving away our human rights, by the truckload. What did we get in exchange for this “sacrifice”?
“The Obama Administration has proposed significantly hiking air travel fees to cover the costs associated with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) molestation of air travelers. Under the new plan, which would garner a whopping $32 billion in ten years, ticket fees that cover the costs of TSA security screenings would more than double for passengers, costing them at least $5 per one-way trip.
As the TSA continues installing naked body scanners at U.S. airports and hiring hordes of new agents to grope travelers at airports, bus stations, trains stations, and even sports stadiums, the agency's more than $8 billion annual budget is rapidly ballooning. And rather than continue to siphon the cash to pay for this unconstitutional nightmare of tyranny directly from taxpayers, Obama and Co. wants to make airlines, airports, and air travelers foot the bill. 
According to a recent Reuters report, the administration wants to charge airlines a $100 departure fee for every commercial, business, and other type of jet that takes off from an airport. The plan would also eliminate federal grant funding for medium and large-sized airports to complete construction projects, which means the airports would have to significantly raise fees for travelers and airlines in order to cover these costs.” (1)
In 15 days, US troops will replace civilian cops and this nation will become just another place that is now formally a POLICE STATE! No Constitution, No formal LAWS, just another bunch of international Outlaws that will have taken over one more country in the name of greed, massive arrogance and global-corruption. And ‘NEVER FORGET’ that “we” made all this possible because we have never resisted any of the crap they’ve been trying to sell us since September eleventh 2001!

Oh and in answer to the NEW $32 Billion Dollar Question: NO ­ HELL NO! The US Department of Homeland Security Must be dissolved!

The people of this country have paid, and paid, and paid into this dump: Over three trillion (far more than the one trillion they are claiming) went into the Iraq War alone, and what did anyone get for that? We’re still at it in Afghanistan and that FAILURE will continue so long as the Poppy-fields grow and the oil continues to flow. We are currently involved in seven ongoing wars, and we have possibly four more on the side-burners just waiting for the “right moment” to launch those as well. Is ‘eleven’ still our magic number: and how much longer can this one way street survive where we pay for every mistake that every corporation makes and every fraud that every major bank chooses to indulge in? New taxes are proposed every week now, along with new draconian limits on every facet of our lives. Don’t just dissolve Homeland Insecurity SMASH IT, and arrest everyone associated with this criminal enterprise.

There are only a few days left: Is there nothing that you will not just accept without questions or resistance! This goes way beyond disgusting!

kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net

Revealed: The occult obsessions of Britain's greatest scientist Sir Isaac Newton

He laid the foundations of classical physics and is considered to be one of the greatest scientists of all time. But Sir Isaac Newton was also deeply interested in the occult and applied a scientific approach to the study of scripture and Jewish mysticism.

Now Israel's national library, which contains a vast trove of Newton's esoteric writings, has digitised his occult collection and posted it online.

Among the yellowed texts is Newton's famous prediction of the apocalypse in 2060.

The quintessential scientist, Newton revolutionised the approach to physics, maths and astronomy in the 17th and 18th century.

He laid the foundations for most of classical mechanics, including the the principal of universal gravitation and the three laws of motion which bear his name. However, the curator of Israel's national library's humanities collection said Newton was also a devout Christian who believed that scripture provided a 'code' to the natural world.

'Today, we tend to make a distinction between science and faith, but to Newton it was all part of the same world,' said Milka Levy-Rubin. 'He believed that careful study of holy texts was a type of science, that if analysed correctly could predict what was to come.'

To further his understanding, Newton learned Hebrew and delved into the study of esoteric Jewish philosophy, the mysticism of Kabbala and the Talmud. For instance, he based his calculation on the end of days on information gleaned from the Book of Daniel, which projected the apocalypse 1,260 years later.

Newton figured that this count began from the crowning of Charlemagne as Roman emperor in the year 800. He also believed that the geometry of Solomon's temple encoded ancient wisdom about proportions in nature and man's place in Creation.


The Coming World Government

By ADRIAN SALBUCHI—

Lucid and aware people observing world events unfold over the past decade or so – say, since September 11, 2001 – will have surely asked themselves what on Earth is going on here? We see ever-growing violence, war, outright lies, invasions, false flags, social upheavals, poverty, ruin and the death of millions… The world’s become a pretty dangerous and pitiful place to live in, and it only gets worse…

Which leads us to the obvious question: Why? Why is all this happening? Can we explain it away as Man’s wicked nature? Or his folly and ignorance? Perhaps just a series of bad mistakes and wrong turns on key issues?

Most everybody will have a ready reply, no doubt coloured by his or her own philosophical outlook. The more rational will say it’s just wrong decisions taken by normal people in an environment of growing complexity. Optimists will shrug their shoulders playing things down with the quaint statement that there’s always been war, persecution, poverty and corruption… Pessimists, as always, will complain that we’re all doomed, especially if they are “2012-repent-the-end-of-the-world-draws-nigh” types. What, then, should we think?


World Government

The dream of erecting a world government controlled by a very small, extremely powerful and elusive minority goes back several centuries. Its roots lie not just on the political stage but, more so, in social, cultural and religious spheres, often with symbolic, “occult” overtones.

In our time it has been variously described under the guise of “New World Order,” “One World,” “Over-World” and, more recently, “Globalisation.” Call it what you will, the facts are that national sovereignty, which is the ability of the People to organise around nation-states, to make the final decisions on their own affairs, from being a sharply defined concept is now so eroded and diffuse that no one can readily define exactly what sovereignty means today.

Maybe this would be acceptable if national sovereignty were lessened for the sake of better coping with global problems affecting Mankind as a whole – for the Common Good – however increasing famine, disease, contamination and war shows a very different picture. Why? The reason is that basically World Government is not emerging around robust global public institutions that have (or should have) the Public Good of We the People in the forefront, but rather around private organisations that have sectorial profit and interests at their forefront. In fact, the World Government we see rising before our eyes has one key, seldom mentioned, characteristic: it’s private.


GREEDY EURO MPS DEMAND PAY RISE AS THE EU FALLS APART


GRASPING Euro MPs sparked fury last night by demanding a pay rise of up to three per cent.

As the eurozone teeters on the brink of catastrophe and Britain is forced to tighten its belt, the shameless demand added to the growing clamour for us to pull out of the EU. The basic salary of an MEP is already £82,915 a year, compared with £64,766 for an MP at Westminster. Euro MPs can also rake in £360,000 in expenses.

If the three per cent budget increase is ratified in Brussels next month, MEPs would receive an extra £2,500 in pay and more lucrative expenses and pension entitlements. It would also add the equivalent of an extra £45million a year to the hugely inflated parliamentary budget, just as debt-ravaged Greece faces financial ruin.

The increase would bring the total cost of the army of MEPs and their hangers-on to a staggering £1.55billion next year. It proves the juggernaut of EU excess shows no signs of slowing and will add more support to the Daily Express crusade for Britain to pull out of Europe.


Syrian Girl - Why Al Qaeda is Al CIAda

We are also told about the Salafists, and a little on the secular nature of Syria, and the competing goals of the Gulf States, particularly Qatar to rule by religion.

US, Israel Invoke Terror To Ratchet Up War Threats Against Iran


US, Israel Invoke Terror To Ratchet Up War Threats Against Iran

By Bill Van Auken

Both Washington and Israel have seized upon a string of abortive bomb plots in India, Georgia and Thailand to escalate war threats against Iran.

In India, an unknown individual on a motorcycle attached a bomb to a car in which the wife of an Israeli diplomat was riding in Delhi on February 13. The woman and the car’s driver were lightly injured. On the same day in Tbilisi, Georgia, a bomb was discovered attached to an Israeli embassy vehicle and defused.

And in Bangkok, Thailand, three individuals identified as Iranians were arrested after a bizarre incident Tuesday in which explosives detonated inside their apartment and one of them blew off his own legs with a homemade grenade.

The three incidents, in which there were no fatalities, were immediately labeled by the Israeli government as terrorist attacks organized by Tehran that, in the words of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, demonstrated why all nations must draw “red lines against Iranian aggression.”

“Iran’s terror operations are now exposed for all to see,” Netanyahu said during a Knesset [Israeli parliament] plenum on Wednesday. “Iran is undermining the world’s stability and harms innocent diplomats.”

What was striking about the first two incidents in Delhi and Tbilisi was that they involved the use of devices—bombs attached by magnets to cars—similar to those used to assassinate at least four Iranian nuclear scientists over the past two years.

The reported aim of these attacks has been to sabotage Iran’s supposed quest for a nuclear weapon, although Tehran has denied such aims and neither the International Atomic Energy Agency nor anyone else has provided evidence that Iran is seeking nuclear arms. For its part, Israel is believed to possess some 400 nuclear weapons.

As US intelligence officials and Israeli sources have confirmed, those terrorist attacks—the latest of which claimed the life of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a scientist employed at Iran’s Natanz uranium enrichment facility, on January 11—were organized by the Israeli spy agency, Mossad, in collaboration with operatives of the MeK, or People’s Mujahedin, a group classified by Washington as an international terrorist organization.

Despite Israel’s assertions, no officials in any of the three countries that were the scene of the latest incidents have charged the Iranian government with responsibility.

What all three bomb plots appear to have in common is their inept, amateurish character. This was particularly the case in Bangkok, where the three individuals involved made no attempt at concealing their identities—all of them carried Iranian passports, moved into a building close to an Iranian cultural center and then proceeded to blow themselves up.

In Georgia, a government official suggested that a Georgian employee of the embassy may have been targeted for personal reasons.

Why Iran, if it were to seek revenge for Mossad’s murder of its scientists, would choose to do it in two friendly Asian countries—India is the world’s largest importer of Iranian oil—is far from clear. Nor for that matter does the wife of a low-level diplomat seem a likely target for such retaliation.

One curious piece of information was published in the Times of India Thursday. It seems that the chief of Mossad, Tamir Pardo, flew to Delhi just days before the bomb attack as the head of a large delegation of Israeli intelligence agents. While there he held talks with Indian officials on the possible threat of Iranian attacks.

In India itself, there is substantial skepticism about Israel’s charges of Iranian culpability in the attack.

As Times of India columnist Shobhan Saxena commented Wednesday:

“The West, led by the US, has been trying for years to damage India’s ties with Iran, our second biggest supplier of oil. Is it a coincidence that this attack happened just about when Iran agreed to take payment in Rupees for the oil it’s selling to India? The Rupee payment agreement signalled the total failure of western countries to stop India from doing business with Iran. So, if Delhi terror incident leads to a friction in Delhi-Tehran ties, who benefits? The whole incident has to be seen in this perspective...The only country that benefits is Israel.”
In Tehran, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said that the Israeli charges of Iranian government responsibility for the incidents in India, Georgia and Thailand represented “the continuation of the US government’s false claims [that Iran had plotted to] assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to Washington.”

That alleged plot was floated last October by US Attorney General Eric Holder. It supposedly involved a failed Iranian-American car dealer from Texas being recruited by Iranian agents in Mexico and then made the go-between for the hiring of members of the Mexican drug cartel, Los Zetas, to blow up the Saudi ambassador in a Washington, DC restaurant. Iran denied having anything to do with the supposed plot and its details were so improbable that it was widely dismissed as a fabrication, though it is now being revived by US officials in conjunction with the Israeli accusations.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast denied any Iranian role in the three latest incidents. “The Islamic Republic of Iran regards the Zionist regime’s agents as perpetrators of such terrorist actions with criminal and hidden purposes,” he said.

Meanwhile in the midst of the steadily escalating campaign of war propaganda by the US, Israel and the mass media, all depicting Iran as the greatest threat to world peace and security, two US intelligence chiefs presented revealing congressional testimony on Thursday.

Defense Intelligence Agency director Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess told a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee that Iran is unlikely to initiate any war and would only respond if it were attacked.

“Iran can close the Strait of Hormuz at least temporarily, and may launch missiles against United States forces and our allies in the region if it is attacked,” he said.

Despite the continuous provocations by Israel and Washington, however, along with an ever-tightening sanctions regime that is itself tantamount to an act of war, Burgess added that “the agency assesses Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict.”

Testifying at the same hearing, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper declared it “technically feasible”  that Tehran could produce a nuclear weapon in one or two years, “but practically not likely.”

In other words, beneath the unrelenting attempts to brand Iran as an aggressor that must be stopped from imminently acquiring nuclear weapons, the assessment of US intelligence is that Iran would only act militarily if attacked and is not even close to challenging Israel’s regional monopoly on nuclear bombs.

The lies about “weapons of mass destruction” and terrorism are being used against Iran—just as they were a decade ago against Iraq—to prepare a war of aggression aimed at furthering US imperialism’s aim of achieving hegemony over the strategically vital energy producing regions of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia.