The 14 Words

Saturday, 31 March 2012

Dead MI6 Spy In Bag: Another Error By LGC Forensics

Someone had to go down for it to appease the Liberal Race Traitor Left, looks like these two drew the short straw!

Regular readers of Resistance Radio's articles will recall the name LGC Forensics -- Britain's largest privately owned supplier of forensic services, which took over from the government-owned Forensic Science Service, whichclosed this month due to its losing up to £2m a month.

LGC Forensics' managing director Steve Allen boasts that the company provides "capacity and faster turnaround times for DNA analysis than in most other countries", and their evidence has been central to many high-profile British murder convictions -- including the convictions of David Norris and Gary Dobson in January, for the murder of Stephen Lawrence in 1993.

We have previously detailed the many serious questions surrounding the forensic evidence that was central to Norris's and Dobson's convictions. During the trial, judge Justice Treacy even directed the jury that they should acquit both defendants, unless they were sure that scientific evidence tying them to the murder scene was not the result of contamination.

Earlier this month we reported how further doubt had been cast on the soundness of the convictions, after a rape trial collapsed following LGC Forensics' admission that a sample in its possession had become so contaminated during testing it could no longer be presented in evidence. The accuseds' DNA, taken in connection with another incident, had been allowed to contaminate a sample from the crime scene -- a location the man said he had never been anywhere near. This serious error led a "senior source" quoted in The Guardian to warn that:
Potentially this has national implications. Hundreds of cases will have to be reviewed. We have no idea what the parameters will have to be. It's serious – it's dealing with the credibility of the system.
Gareth Williams
Yesterday it was revealed that yet another serious error has been made by LGC Forensics, this time in connection to the bizarre case of the so-called "spy-in-a-bag" -- math genius and MI6 worker Gareth Williams, who in August 2010 was found dead at his London flat, his naked body zipped inside a sports holdall that had been padlocked from the outside.

At yesterday's interim hearing into Mr Williams' death, ahead of a full inquest next month, the court heard how a "mix-up" had been made over DNA found at the crime scene. The police believed that a sample of DNA found on his hand was their best lead in discovering who had locked Mr Williams into the bag, but as reported in yesterday's The Telegraph:

Earlier this month, during a review of the evidence, police discovered the DNA belonged to one of the forensics officers who had worked at the scene. A typographical error by a worker at the forensics firm LGC meant a numerical code for the DNA sample had been wrongly fed into a computer, meaning the sample was marked as unidentified.
That this is the second serious error by LGC Forensics to have been identified in a very short period of time is alarming. We do not know how many other mistakes have been made by the company, nor how many innocent people may have been found guilty based on their forensic evidence. A serious investigation needs to be conducted into procedures at the company, and cases in which people have been convicted on their forensic evidence clearly need to be urgently reassessed.

This includes the murder convictions of Gary Dobson and David Norris, currently serving 14- and 15-year sentences based on evidence that could well have been contaminated, as the defence convincingly but unsuccessfully argued earlier this year, during testing at LGC's laboratories.

National Socialism: Not Right-Wing, Not Fascism

National Socialism is NOT fascism, and yet the general public will frequently misuse both terms as if they are synonymous with one-another. George Orwell, the author of 1984, summed it up thusly: “…almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’. That is about as near to a definition as this much-abused word has come.” That is very true; misinformed people use the word as a slur towards anything they don’t like.

Often, the word fascist is aimed at National Socialists or general racial realists, and this is completely incorrect. However you wouldn’t expect someone who stands against their own racial interests (as often is the case, many anti-white activists are racially white themselves) to bother understanding the “what” or “why” of what they claim to believe, or even learning what “fascism” actually is. Hence we have groups calling themselves “antifa” which is short for anti-fascist even though they do not know what fascism is, nor are they actually against it. Instead, they are against National Socialism and White People who “dare” take pride in their rich European heritage.

National Socialism is a complete political ideology for governing an Aryan Nation, but also a guideline for healthy Aryan Living. NS takes many stances that run parallel to left-wing issues such as environmentalism, and anti-war. Fascism is simply a money-based economic system that doesn’t take race into account at all. Here are some quotes to help the reader understand:

“Therefore, for the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value,-outside the State. In this sense Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State, the synthesis and unity of all values, interprets, develops and gives strength to the whole life of the people.” – Mussolini
In contrast:
“The State is only a means to an end. Its end and its purpose is to preserve and promote a community of human beings who are physically as well as spiritually kindred.” – Adolf Hitler
“On all these grounds it is recommended for all National-Socialists to speak no longer of the total state, rather of the completeness (totality) of the National-Socialist worldview, of the NSDAP as the body of this worldview, and of the National-Socialist state as the tool for the preservation of the soul, spirit, and blood of National-Socialism as the powerful phenomenon which made its beginning in the 20th century.”
We discussed this issue in depth on one of our American Nazi Party talk show episodes (#13) that is embedded below. Finally, it is important to point out in this article that NS is against capitalism and all the greed, materialism, parasitism, and degeneracy that goes with it.

ANP Episode 13

Truth Hertz: Interview with Zion Crime Factory. 30/03/2012

Obamas (Handlers) Inner Lenin Invoked In Desperate Re-Election Strategy

It only stands to reason that where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where there’s service, there is someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master. Ayn Rand

Perhaps the forces that now menace freedom are too strong to be resisted for very long. It is still our duty to do whatever we can to resist them. Aldous Huxley

Matters are becoming especially nasty in US politics as we approach a seminal election. 
 The country is irreconcilably divided between hard-core liberals and conservatives. Fortunately, there are enough independents that neither hard-core can muster a majority without modifying, to various degrees, their views. At least that is the way that elections worked before this one.

President Obama sees within his reach his dream of transforming the country. Unfortunately for Obama, his failures are apparent to growing numbers of citizens, many of whom supported him the first time around and are now suffering “buyers remorse.”

He is so close to what he planned, yet it is slipping away and his desperation is showing. Apparently in an effort to prevent this from happening, he is willing to employ his community organizer skills on a national level. These Marxist-Leninist-Alinsky tools were not planned to be unveiled until after his re-election. Now that this occurrence is at risk, he appears to be willing to use them as tools for re-election. This strategy reflects either desperation or misjudgment.

What do I mean by Marxist-Leninist-Alinsky tools? Quite simply, they are practical tools designed to accomplish an objective without regard to the legality or morality of the means. Obama has committed all out to an “ends justifies the means” campaign. Here, for example, are instructions from Lenin on power:

Comrades! The insurrection of five kulak districts should be pitilessly suppressed. … 
1. Hang (and make sure that the hanging takes place in full view of the people) no fewer than one hundred known landlords, rich men, bloodsuckers.
2. Publish their names.
3. Seize all their grain from them.
4. Designate hostages in accordance with yesterday’s telegram. 
Do it in such a fashion that for hundreds of kilometres around the people might see, tremble, know, shout: “they are strangling, and will strangle to death, the bloodsucking kulaks”.
Telegraph receipt and implementation. 
Yours, Lenin.
This telegraph appeared in an article by James Lewis on American Thinker. Mr. Lewis in his article likens current Democrat behavior to that of Lenin. He does not suggest that hanging is a part of that strategy, although other thug-like behavior is. When one’s pedigree includes the likes of Marx, Alinsky, Ayers and others of that ilk, thug behavior as a part of politics is the norm.

The bizarre and nearly unprecedented recent political behavior on the part of the Obama Administration results from the recognition that the election is slipping away. Some of the headwinds Mr. Obama faces are the following:

  • The economy is not improving (nor will it before the election).
  • Government stimulus is increasingly seen as political favoritism and a waste of taxpayer money.
  • Government continues to spend money that it doesn’t have, leading the nation closer to bankruptcy.
  • Voters understand that this spending has mortgaged the future of their children and grandchildren and may destroy the country.
  • The centerpiece of Obama’s economic program, green energy initiatives, produced no new energy and a track record of failing companies. It was nothing more than political payoffs to Democrat supporters.
  • Gas prices are at record levels and expected to soar upward from here while Obama plays politics with an important pipeline.
  • President Obama’s Democrat-controlled Senate refused to pass his requested tax hikes on oil companies.
  • The Supreme Court has exposed Obama’s crowning domestic achievement, ObamaCare, for its legal absurdities (which does not mean they will overrule it). The CBO estimates have more than doubled, casting doubt on the integrity of the President’s cost estimates.
  • President Obama’s proposed budget did not garner one Democrat vote in the House.
Mr. Obama has no achievement to run on and many negatives to overcome. Furthermore, his once perceived mystical qualities are no more. Most of what he has done has been a failure. Everything he has touched has become worse.

There is no way to intellectually defend his failed policies, but then that holds for much of liberalism in general. Liberalism is not based on reason but on “caring.”  If you are not liberal, then you must be mean and uncaring. But what happens when you have been in charge and gotten all of your programs put in place and they don’t work? Under such circumstances it is hard to blame others for the problems. That is precisely the quandary in which Obama finds himself.

He cannot be re-elected running on his pitiful record. There is no way to defend it theoretically or empirically. “Caring”  is not an asset when incompetence overrides prevails. The only strategy left is the Leninist-Marxist politics of destruction and coercion. Hence, we see the beginnings of classic mob politics, madness passing off as idealist causes or movements. We saw it when Obama tacitly or overtly (take your pick) approved of the Occupy Wall Street mobs. Before that we saw the antagonism surface when Obama inserted himself on the side of Henry Louis Gates against the Boston Police Department even when he had no knowledge of what had transpired. Now we a similar insertion into the tragedy of the Trayvon Martin shooting.

The facts of this case were not known when the great ambulance chasers of the race industry (Sharpton and Jackson) began to spin their version of what had happened. (As more information leaks out, this duo appears to be as unreliable as ever.) That President Obama involved himself and encouraged this racial unrest is downright shameful and dangerous. He jumped in despite any knowledge of what had happened yet he remained conspicuously silent when the Black Panthers placed a bounty on Zimmerman, the alleged shooter.

Race-baiting by the country’s premier race pimps who pose as reverends is bad enough. It is disgusting and dangerous when the similar taking of sides occurs from the highest office in the land. The President is expected to adhere to the law and not encourage what appears to be misguided vigilante justice.

The position of President Obama is unprecedented. It demonstrates extreme misjudgment or an attempt to capitalize politically by pandering to a set of his constituents. Regardless, it is not a good sign for the country.Doug Ross offers the best advice for the country:
All Americans — citizens of every race, creed, religion and color — should reject the Democrat Party and its vicious marketing of racial hatred.
Protein Wisdom opines on Obama’s blatant practice of identity politics:
That our President and members of his party have not only allowed the racial demagoguery to continue, but have in fact participated in it (and intend to extend its rhetorical reach), should be a chilling reminder that — even in the most sophisticated societies, under the stewardship of the most enlightened laws — the controls we place on government are, in the end, merely words. Once an anti-foundationalist ideological movement like the progressive left has decided it no longer has to abide by legal restraints should the context arise where they are “morally bound” to “resist” laws — that is, once they declare that law is man-made and thus contingent and not binding in particular contexts of their choosing — there is nothing left but force and the will to power, which become the de facto ruling conditions of society (albeit, these will be disguised and qualified with propaganda attempts to hide their baser imulses under the rubric of “social justice” and “civil disobedience,”  etc.).
In a society truly governed by the rule of law, Congressmen and Justice Department officials would be calling for a respect of due process and reinforcing the integrity of states and local law enforcement. Instead, we have members of Congress — and members of the media, like MSNBC race pimp and host Al Sharpton — essentially trying to lead a lynch mob based around public pressure, scapegoating, rank racialist politics, and the kind of bullying typical of identity politics reinforced by the social taboos long set in place by adepts of political correctness.

What we are witnessing is truly outrageous. And it is disgusting. And it has been cheerily manufactured by those who presume to rule over us by promoting various forms of tribalism to keep as at each others’ throats.

The President’s re-election effort, despite compliant support from the media and the Federal Reserve, appears to be in serious trouble. To most, the re-election is all he is interested in and he will stop at nothing in that pursuit. This situation is increasingly recognized by Democrats who see him as willing to sacrifice his own party to achieve his personal objectives. Look for more Democrats to decide the best way to protect their own careers is to distance themselves from this failed president.

It appears as though mob tactics may be the only viable strategy for this President. When one is unable to defend one’s record either theoretically or empirically, what else is left? You can try to buy votes by playing Santa Claus but the government is out of money and that would only anger the electorate more. In this position, you either recognize that you have failed or you resort to guerrilla politics. President Obama’s ego and arrogance does not allow the former, so brace yourself for a “scorched earth” election unlike anything seen in our lifetimes.

Protein Wisdom describes the point at which the country has reached:
We either fight back or we don’t. But the days of sitting quiet and hoping it all blows over are no longer a legitimate option. Because that maneuver has led to a kind of tacit complicity, and we have, as a nation, reached the tipping point where, if we don’t push back now, we will find ourselves living in democratic despotism — without the recourse of a stable set of laws to save us from the will of a political consensus born of propaganda, misinformation, intellectual laziness, and the deconstruction of every last tenet of classical liberalism institutionalized at our founding and framing.
This election will likely be a preview of what it will be like to live in a Banana Republic with no Rule of Law.

Secrets of Prometheus Film Leaked!

No, we’re not going to give away any SPOILERS here; instead we will reveal the agenda behindPrometheus, the new film by legendary director Ridley Scott (Alien, Blade Runner, Gladiator) hitting theaters June 8.

The secret is that the elite believe they are attaining godhood and are destined for the stars. Their ancient and occultic views are reflected in the dark themes of Prometheus, the very name of which hints at the quest for eternity and power among a group who think a divine right bestowed by a higher intelligence gives creedence to their meddling with the affairs of common man.

Micro-Chipping Agenda & RFID Chips Are Being Implemented

You can click on the link above and read the full article.

Please read my other article

Predictive programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as ‘natural progressions’; thus lessening any possible public resistance and commotion. Predictive programming therefore may be considered as a veiled form of preemptive mass manipulation or mind control.

Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda confirms the reality of the microchip agenda, and shows that the weapon of propaganda has been used against the public for decades in order to familiarize us with the idea of being chipped. This process is called predictive programming and its purpose is literally to program the mind of the victim so as to accept without question whatever is required by the programmer – in this case, the idea of being microchipped at some point in the future. The victim is generally unaware of being programmed, believing that it’s all just harmless entertainment. For this reason it can be a powerful and effective weapon against us.

By explaining this process and giving example after example, Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda is an attempt to alert the viewer to some of the ways in which we have been manipulated throughout our lives for the specific purpose of slowly but surely shepherding us all into a Hellish world of microchip implants and totalitarian control. We hope that by exposing the programming we can break the program and derail this diabolical agenda. To be successful we need your help.

We can clearly see how we slowly being brainwashed and forced to believe that it is in our benefit and convenience. We are slowly micro-chipping our children by convincing ourselves that it is for our peace of mind and for their safety. In the process we are getting them used to this kind of a way of life.

We are getting our children so used to and dependent on these ID’s and RFID chips that by the time they are adults they can not function without them.

It started with the micro-chipping of animals, first voluntarily and now often by law, and the same method is being used on humans. Just Remember human life can not be degraded to a 16 digit RFID chip number embedded under you skin under any circumstance.

Below are many highly revealing excerpts of important microchip implants news stories reported in the major media.

USA: Biden Uses Trayvon vs. Zimmerman Incident to Push Gun Control

You just knew it was coming. The Left never lets a manufactured crisis go to waste, and the Trayvon/Zimmerman incident is no exception. If you ask me, though, the Trayvon/Zimmerman incident is a shining example of why citizens should be allowed to carry guns.

After all, if some punk were smashing your brains into the sidewalk, wouldn’t you like to have the option of using a gun to make him stop?

Also, something that I haven’t noticed anyone else picking up on is that Zimmerman showed extreme self-control in shooting Trayvon. He could have unloaded his clip into Trayvon, yet he fired only once. You know what that tells me? That tells me there was no malice in Zimmerman’s actions and he was merely using the gun to stop Trayvon from beating him up and did not intend to kill him. If it had been me, I would have unloaded my clip into the little puke:

Biden: Trayvon case could spur gun laws debate

By Chad Sinclair

(CBS News) Vice President Joe Biden said Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” gun laws will be a topic of debate in light of the controversy surrounding the shooting of Trayvon Martin.

“It’s important that people be put in a position where their Second Amendment rights are protected, but that they also don’t, as a consequence of the laws, unintendedly put themselves in harm’s way,” Biden told anchor Bob Schieffer in an interview to air on “Face the Nation” on Sunday.
Florida’s gun laws allow people to shoot in self-defense if they feel threatened. Mr. Biden, who was chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee for eight years, said that the Martin case underscores the need to ensure public safety in accordance with current gun laws.
“The idea that there’s this overwhelming additional security in the ownership and carrying concealed and deadly weapons… I think it’s the premise, not the constitutional right, but the premise that it makes people safer is one that I’m not so sure of,” Biden said.

What a moron!

The Jew Shall Make His Name Live Forever

Please don’t cry. The World has cried enough.

Yep... Just like Stephen Lawrence over here in the UK


Money is Not Needed with Energy Abundance

In order to understand the very basis of money, it is best to contemplate how it developed in the first place.

Once society developed past the clan stage, when barter, trade and so forth arose, it became the practice to place value on the products of human energy expended. If one used one's energy to build a bow, go out hunting, kill an animal, process the carcass, and transport the meat back to be traded or bartered for, this gave that meat value. The bow components were free, as was the animal. The same was true for the farmer, who expended meaningful energy in tilling, sowing, tending, harvesting, and, if need be, transporting what that farmer produced. The produce had value. Even the gatherer expended meaningful energy in seeking things to gather, then transporting the find back to be used as "money" for other things. The miner expended the meaningful energy to find the (free) ore, hew it out of the earth, and transport it.

From these beginnings, the practice of using coin and other objects arose to represent this meaningful energy expended when transporting large amounts of goods, as well using to acquire something another had but not having the specific thing the other wanted. And from this, humans went on to bills when coins and jewels and other objects became too cumbersome. And, lately, we have added electronic funds, as even bills are cumbersome in million unit, billion unit and trillion unit transactions. But the foundation of all these monetary units is the meaningful energy expended, whether human or resource-based (oil, coal, nuclear, etc.) energy.

Given this, it becomes clear that an addition of abundant energy -- in the form of overunity ("free energy") and robotics (to replace human energy in necessary work nobody wants to do), the need for money in any form -- barter, trade, work exchange, coin, bills, electronic funds -- becomes unnecessary.

That science/technology is electrogravitics.

Back in the 1950s, electrogravitics, with the Biefeld-Brown Effect as its foundation, was being pursued at all the major aerospace companies: Lockheed, Boeing, Convair, Lear and many others were excitedly exploring what electrogravitics had to offer. Sometime, around 1959 or early 1960, this work became highly classified and, though ostensibly for its "weaponization" concerns, the true reason it became highly classified was because of its overunity capabilities. The power elite grasped that that was the biggest threat to their continued control.

As a source of energy, electrogravitics is ideal. From it, We can have energy that is free of pollution, is easily constructed, and does not contribute to the entropy of the universe. Because it is so ideal, and because the power elite seem bent on Naziesque control of the planet -- with "Patriot" Acts, NDAA's, TSA's, and other fascist enactments -- it is vital that the awareness of such technology spread to the tipping point.

If we can achieve that, Humanity will demand this tech and free itself from:
  • Poverty
  • Hunger
  • Slavery (outright or wage slavery)
  • War (most wars are incited to ensure profit for the war suppliers and "infrastructure rebuilders")
  • The control of the many by the few
  • The love of money (the root of all evil)
  • The need to pay for education (going deeply into debt or forgoing education)
  • Products made to fail so as to ensure future sales
  • Hidden cures (cures are not a money-maker in the long run; sick People keep paying)
  • Spam
  • Aggressive advertising
  • Focus on the material
  • Politics for Self- or special-interest
  • GMO for control of food
  • Water control
  • Hydrofracking, rain forest clearing, oil drilling, coal mining
  • Corporations
  • Corporate "farmers" paid to NOT produce food (so as to keep the prices inflated through supply and demand)
  • Doctors who are more interested in money than patients
  • Bankers
  • Insurance
  • Internet takeover
  • "Voting" machines with proprietary software (why would a simple vote-counting program need to be proprietary? Why do we accept such things?)
  • Waste (presently supermarkets alone throw out hundreds of thousands of tons of food a month, distributing by profit and not need; other waste such as packaging can virtually be eliminated, products will not be made to break so as to ensure future sales)

There's more, but as one can see, just this list is an elimination of most of the problems we presently are beset with.

To the end of achieving the tipping point of awareness, I am offering a petition to the US Military (which presently controls the science of electrogravitics) to release this information. I offer it here in the hopes that you sign -- and not only that, spread the awareness of what I have presented and of the petition itself. More info on how I know about electrogravitics and its capabilities is at the petition site:

Big Government Seeks New Ways to Manage "Big Data"

Government continues to grow, while the amount of data they amass about the lives of citizens grows exponentially. We have seen major corporations in the areas of advertising, social media, defense contracting, and computing form partnerships with government agencies to compile virtual dossiers on all humans.

The fact that we are tracked, traced and databased is indisputable, but even many privacy advocates seem to believe that the sheer amount of data being collected is itself the Achilles Heel of the surveillance-industrial complex; that it is a sort of protection, as who or what could ever sift through it all?

John P. Holdren, Obama's science czar, and author of the controversial eugenics tome,Ecoscience, is one of those directing the solution to the data overload problem. Enter "Big Data."

It was recently announced that the NSA is constructing a massive new $2 billion data center that aims to expand its spy activities.

At this facility the NSA will be spying on every single form of communication, ranging from the entirety of private emails, cell phone calls, Google searches and other Internet activity, to data on travel, parking receipts, purchases at bookstores, and anything and everything they can get their hands on. (Source)
This data collection initiative is one taking place across the board in our largest federal agencies and departments such as the National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the U.S. Geological survey, and DARPA. As government data collection ramps up, the Obama administration through the Office of Science and Technology Policy has announced a $200 million investment in taking this information "from data to decisions."

Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?

Dedicated to the long-suffering Palestinians and Iranians who have been sidelined by the United Nations in favour of the Nuclear Apartheid State of Zionist Israel in the most blatant exercise in International Double Standards that our world has ever known.

The Samson Option

Climate Change Skepticism a Sickness That Must be “Treated,” Says Professor

'Hi, I'm Kari, and when I speak people lose the will to live.This is very good for the earth because it reduces the population.'

Comparing skepticism of man-made global warming to racist beliefs, an Oregon-based professor of sociology and environmental studies has labeled doubts about anthropogenic climate change a “sickness”  for which individuals need to be “treated”.

Professor Kari Norgaard, who is currently appearing at the ‘Planet Under Pressure’ conference in London, has presented a paper in which she argues that “cultural resistance” to accepting the premise that humans are responsible for climate change “must be recognized and treated” as an aberrant sociological behavior.

Norgaard equates skepticism of climate change alarmists – whose data is continually proven to be politicized, agenda driven and downright inaccurate – with racism, noting that overcoming such viewpoints poses a similar challenge “to racism or slavery in the U.S. South.”

“Professor Norgaard considers that fuzzy-studies academics such as herself must stand shoulder to shoulder with the actual real climate scientists who know some maths in an effort to change society and individuals for their own good. It’s not a new idea: trick-cyclists in Blighty and the US have lately called for a “science of communicating science” rather reminiscent of Isaac Asimov’s science-fictional “Psychohistory” discipline, able to predict and alter the behaviour of large populations,” reports the Register.
As Jurriaan Maessen documented yesterday, the ‘Planet Under Pressure’ confab at which Norgaard is appearing to push this insane drivel is nothing other than a strategy session for neo-eugenicists to hone their population control agenda.

A statement put out by the scientists behind the event calls for humans to be packed into denser cities (eco-gulags?) so that the rest of the planet can be surrendered to mother nature. It’s a similar idea to the nightmare ‘Planned-Opolis’ proposal put out by the Forum for the Future organization last year, in which human activity will be tightly regulated by a dictatorial technocracy in the name of saving the planet.

The mindset of this gaggle of arrogant, scoffing elitists in their drive to micro-manage the human race, which they regard as a plague on the earth, is best encapsulated by the following quote from ‘Planet Under Pressure’ attendee and Yale University professor Karen Seto.

“We certainly don’t want them (humans) strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together],” Seto told MSNBC.

UK: Paki whipped, beaten and punished with jump leads clamped to his nose by his relatives

A child-like man nicknamed 'The Clown' by his own family was subjected to a campaign of violence and cruelty by relatives who regarded him as a financial burden, a court was told today.

In one of many painful and humiliating punishments Ghalib Hussain, 27, of Accrington, Lancashire, had one end of a pair of jump leads clamped onto his nose and was hit with the other end because he cannot read and write, Burnley Crown Court heard.

On other occasions Mr Hussain was punched in the face when he failed to learn Arabic text and was also warned he would be buried alive in a cemetery and have his tongue ripped out.

He was also whipped with a belt and a stick by those who should have cared for him, it is alleged.

At Burnley Crown Court, his uncle Nek Alam, 72, and Alam’s sons Janghir Alam, 29, Zahir Alam, 33, and Zahoor Alam, 32, went on trial accused of false imprisonment, making threats to kill and causing grievous bodily harm. The jury was told he also had to kiss the feet of his uncle and was not allowed to eat until he was told to.

Finally he was rescued by police who found him huddled on a settee at his home unable to stand due to a broken right hip, said to be inflicted when he was forced to the ground and jumped on.

Girl of five is youngest UK victim of forced marriage

Up to 400 children in the past year have been coerced into or threatened with marriage – including a girl aged just five. She is the youngest victim in Britain, according to the Home Office's Forced Marriage Unit.

The young age of victims was disclosed as ministers consider whether to bring in new laws to make it possible to prosecute families who compel children to marry.

A new criminal offence of forced marriage could be similar to the system in force in Scotland, which carries a maximum penalty of two years in jail.

Children make up nearly a third of cases dealt with by the Home Office organisation. Its head, Amy Cumming, said: 'The youngest of these was actually five years old, so there are children involved in the practice across the school age range.'

Miss Cumming said 29 per cent of the cases her unit dealt with last year were under the age of 18. The name of the five-year-old has not been disclosed and no details of where or how she was married have been released.

The Home Office said that most cases involve families from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, Iraq, Iran, Turkey and North and East Africa.

The doctors and nurses putting lives at risk because they can't speak English

When Jan Middleton woke in her hospital bed at 2am, she feared immediately that her life was in grave danger. She had already undergone an operation to remove a brain tumour but had been readmitted after developing a serious post-surgical infection.

So when she woke in the middle of the night to discover the infection had spread, causing new lesions to open up on her face, Ms Middleton, 54, realised she needed help quickly.

‘It was terrifying, and made worse by the fact that I had been told the brain infection put me at a high risk of meningitis and stroke,’ she says. ‘I told the nurse, an Asian lady, that she needed to call the on-duty doctor straight away. But her English was extremely poor. She kept repeating, “What you saying to me? I don’t understand. Your English not good.” ’
After trying for half an hour to get through to the nurse, Ms Middleton was exhausted — and very scared. In desperation, she pulled out her mobile phone to dial 999 for help.
‘I was on the tenth floor of the hospital. I couldn’t get down to A&E on the ground floor on my own,’ she explained. 'But I couldn’t wait until the morning. When I started to tell the nurse that I was calling 999, she seemed finally to understand and bleeped for a doctor. But it had taken a 30 minutes.’
Ms Middleton, an articulate and resourceful former lawyer, eventually received the emergency attention she wanted. But she had fallen foul of a burgeoning problem in Britain’s hospitals — one which many other patients are not nearly so well equipped to handle.

Growing numbers of the NHS’s medical and nursing staff come from overseas, and their English is so poor they cannot communicate effectively with patients.

Yet, far from tackling this dangerous situation, the European Union is set to reinforce rules which ban English tests for doctors and nurses from the EU before they are allowed to work here, branding it a ‘restraint of free movement’ of workers.

The European directive, currently being debated in Brussels, insists that British employers can only test medics from Europe after their poor English has endangered patient care, flagging ‘serious and concrete doubt about the professional’s sufficient language knowledge’.

The week politics all but died of shame

Could there be any greater indictment of our political class than the election of George Galloway? After a terrible week for all parties, this collapse in trust between voters and MPs should terrify us all

Race Traitor George Galloway will now represent the Muslim 'colonisers' in Parliment

George Galloway is the sort of politician who gives mavericks, exhibitionists and charlatans a bad name. In his years as a Labour and later independent MP, he was seldom out of trouble about women, money and the means by which he got his hands on it, or his support for off-the-wall causes and personalities, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein foremost among them.

When in 2010 he lost his battle for the Poplar and Limehouse seat after being Respect MP for neighbouring Bethnal Green and Bow since 2005, the whole House of Commons heaved a sigh of relief at witnessing an end to 23 years of embarrassments ‘Gorgeous George’ had inflicted on the British body politic.

Yet today, heaven help us, he is back on the public payroll, strutting his stuff as Respect MP for Bradford West, where he has achieved a stunning upset by-election victory in a safe Labour seat. What goes on? How is it possible for such a man with such a history to be given a ticket to resume his half-comic, half-deplorable, entirely cringe-making political career?

The immediate answer is that he fought Bradford West as standard-bearer for British [?] Muslims in a constituency with a large majority Muslim population. Next, confidence in the Labour Party, usual holders of the Bradford seat, has hit rock bottom.

[Ashkenazi Jewish immigrant] Ed Miliband is regarded by most of his Shadow Cabinet colleagues, never mind Labour voters at large, as less credible than a Greek economic bailout. Indeed, you would find a lot more Labour voters willing to put their savings into drachmas than to believe Miliband will ever be Prime Minister.

But beyond this partisan issue, almost everybody interested in British politics agrees that there is a much more deeply-rooted malaise, afflicting every party and indeed almost every institution in Britain. There is a collapse of trust in those in charge, and especially in our politicians, which should thoroughly alarm all who care about democracy.

Voters look at Westminster, and see government in the hands of people who seem to care nothing about their opinions, their troubles, their hopes and fears. They are wholly uninterested in representing their constituents’ wishes and hopes — only in their own advancement.

Government after government fails abysmally to address passionate public sentiment about human rights legislation, unrestricted immigration, a justice system that seems skewed in favour of offenders at the expense of their victims, a financial services industry that enriches itself while impoverishing those who trust their money to it, the ludicrous excesses of Health and Safety, and the terrifying growth in youth unemployment.

The inadequacy of the Commons is embodied by its Speaker, John Bercow, a vertically disadvantaged clown with an ego that makes George Galloway appear modest. And MPs chose this man to be their figurehead.

The consequence is reflected in a YouGov poll months ago, which shows public contempt for our politicians at rock bottom. Just 24 per cent of respondents believe MPs are capable of ‘debating issues of public concern in a sensible and considered way’.

Worse, only 15 per cent see Parliament as ‘representing the interests and wishes of people like me’. Barely one-tenth of voters (12 per cent) think our politicians capable of understanding their own daily lives. They believe the Commons fails to hold ministers to account.

Friday, 30 March 2012

Dont Worry USA Israel`s Behind You

Sarkozy compares Toulouse false flag to 9/11

French President and Mossad asset Nicholas Sarkozy is claimingthe Toulouse "attack" has traumatized the French public in a manner similar to how 9/11 traumatized the American public:

Following a sweep of arrests of suspected Islamic militants, French President Nicolas Sarkozy compared the fatal attack outside a Jewish school in Toulouse to the trauma of 9/11. 
The trauma was “very deep in our country,” said Sarkozy, who is facing an uphill reelection battle. He added that it was “a bit like the trauma that followed in the U.S. and New York after 9⁄11.”
Although it's now been established that Mohamed Merah, the patsy who took the blame for the Toulouse rampage, was a French intelligence asset with connections to Israel, and this entire episode has all the signs of an Operation Gladio-style false flag/PSYOP, Sarkozy and the Zionist establishment in France and around the world will use this event to advance their Jew World Order agenda.

I suppose every Jew-run Western country has to have their own version of 9/11, right?

John McCain Is Furious That He Can't Lock Up Americans Under The NDAA

Late last year Senate Armed Services Chairman senior member John McCain (R.-Ariz.) and Carl Levin (D-Mich) crafted a National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) addendum that outraged Americans and put the president on the spot.

The bill, in part, called for allowing the indefinite detention of Americans with no due process whatsoever.

After Obama capitulated and signed the bill into law January 1, we identified the additions everyone was freaking out about:

  • Section 1022 expressly states that the military will imprison anyone who is a member of al-Qaeda or "an associated force" that acts like al-Qaeda; and anyone who planned or carried out an attack, or attempted attack, against the U.S. 
  • Section 1022 continues that detaining American citizens is not required. "UNITED STATES CITIZENS — The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States."
The bottom line being that the government could have imprisoned anyone suspected of, or even associated with, terrorism. But on February 28, Obama issued a Presidential Directive announcing section 1022 would not apply to Americans.

This power was apparently much anticipated by Senator McCain because he's now doing everything in his power to get the legislation enforced, including tying up defense appointments made by the president.

McCain pledged yesterday that until the Pentagon and the White House meet his demands to enforce certain provisions of the NDAA, including indefinite detention, he won't participate in voting on nominees and will do all he can to see the process grinds to a halt.

The Senator even put his ire to paper and sent off a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta referring to a series of bullet-pointed NDAA grievances, one-by-one.

The list is filled with concerns over force assessment and budgetary priorities, but in the second to last bullet-point McCain lashes out directly at Obama for undermining the indefinite detention clause in the 2012 NDAA.

Greatest TV Moment Of The Trayvon Martin - Zimmerman Case

Nothing tops this. Not the mindless liberal talking heads on MSNBC and their over the top rhetoric. Not the Bobby Rush on the House floor donning the hoodie. This one takes the cake.

We won't spoil it for you. Just hit click, and enjoy!

Some background; Ms. Brown represents an oddly shaped district in northeast Florida that includes urban areas of Jacksonville. She has been in congress for over a decade. She has had serious opposition in the past, including a black conservative female opponent who ran a strong race against her a few years back.

Let us hope someone runs a serious challenge to her in 2012. [Niggers are so god damn stupid!]

ABC Faked the Zimmerman video

The Daily Caller has investigated the ABC News claim that police closed circuit television of George Zimmerman being brought to the Sanford, FL police station, in the news network claims that Zimmerman shows no sign of injury, in what appears to be an intentional effort by the network to cast doubt on Zimmerman’s accounting of events. Zimmerman claims he was forced to shoot high school football player Trayvon Martin after Martin knocked him to the ground and began slamming his head into the ground.

ABC News blatantly lied about what the video showed.
“A police surveillance video taken the night that Trayvon Martin was shot dead shows no blood or bruises on George Zimmerman,” ABC News reporter Matt Gutman wrote, noting that Zimmerman told police “he shot Martin after he was punched in the nose, knocked down and had his head slammed into the ground.”
ABC News reported that Zimmerman appears uninjured in the video. But a still image from the video indicates what appears to be a vertical laceration or scar several inches long.

In fact, not one but both both camera views showed that Zimmerman has a laceration several inches long on the back of his head. Any blood had been cleaned up by the Fire Dept assets that had treated Zimmerman at the scene, and bruising would not have shown on the low-resolution video.

More disgusting is the obvious fact that ABC News used a strategically placed chyron (graphic) to cover up the back of Zimmerman’s head for their broadcast, covering up the video that would have disproven their story. View the video at the Daily Caller, and you’ll note that they did not even need a chyron, their was no need to transmit any additional visual data to explain the story.

The only logical reason the chyron exists is to cover-up Zimmerman’s wounds. ABC News doctored the video to sell a false narrative, in a dishonest attempt to brand a man a murderer. I’d be very interested to know if Zimmerman can pursue legal action against ABC for constructing this false narrative.

USA: Why Does The Department Of Homeland Security Need 450 Million Hollow Point Bullets?

Somebody out there has decided that the Department of Homeland Security needs a whole lot of ammunition. Recently it was announced that ATK was awarded a contract to provide up to 450 million hollow point bullets to the Department of Homeland Security over the next five years.

Is it just me, or does that sound incredibly excessive? What in the world is the DHS going to do with 450 million rounds? What possible event would ever require that much ammunition?

If the United States was ever invaded, it would be the job of the U.S. military to defend the country, so that can't be it. So what are all of those bullets for? Who does the Department of Homeland Security plan to be shooting at? According to the U.S. Census, there are only about 311 million people living in the entire country. So why does the Department of Homeland Security need 450 million rounds of ammunition? Either this is an incredible waste or there is something that the Department of Homeland Security is not telling us.

I could understand if the U.S. military was ordering ammunition in this quantity. When you fight wars you can go through ammunition very rapidly. But the Department of Homeland Security is only supposed to be shooting at people very rarely. It simply does not make sense that they would need so much ammunition.

The following is an excerpt from the official press release about this deal between ATK and the Department of Homeland Security....
ATK announced that it is being awarded an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) agreement from the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS, ICE) for .40 caliber ammunition. This contract features a base of 12 months, includes four option years, and will have a maximum volume of 450 million rounds. 
ATK was the incumbent and won the contract with its HST bullet, which has proven itself in the field. The special hollow point effectively passes through a variety of barriers and holds its jacket in the toughest conditions. HST is engineered for 100-percent weight retention, limits collateral damage, and avoids over-penetration.'We are proud to extend our track record as the prime supplier of .40 caliber duty ammunition for DHS, ICE,' said Ron Johnson, President of ATK's Security and Sporting group.
But this is not the only kind of ammo that the DHS is placing an order for. Business Insider is also reporting that the Department of Homeland Security is seeking to buy 175 million rifle ammunition rounds....
We've also learned that the Department has an open bid for a stockpile of rifle ammo. Listed on the federal business opportunities network, they're looking for up to 175 million rounds of .233 caliber ammo to be exact. The 223 is almost exactly the same round used by NATO forces, the 5.56 x 45mm.
This all comes at a time when gun sales are absolutely going through the roof in the United States. Gun manufacturer Sturm, Ruger & Co. recently announced that it would be suspending new orders until May because it received orders for more than one million guns during the months of January and February.

Australian Globalist Senator Bob Brown Calls for World Government

The Globalists have officially infiltrated the Australian Government and have now admitted on record that they want Australia to lead the world to introduce global government and the new world order.

Australian Globalist, Greens Party leader and unofficial leader of the Australian Labor Party, Senator Bob Brown, has been quoted as saying that the “world should be ruled by a new global parliament under the auspices of the United Nations”

Senator Bob Brown then went on the say that "Australia should to take the lead in establishing a global parliament to govern issues such as nuclear proliferation, international financial transactions and poverty."

These comments made by Globalist Senator Bob Brown prove that the government is now actively seeking global government and the new world order. Senator Bob Brown even went as far to describe how a global government will function. He was quoted as saying "a global government should consist of a bicameral (two houses) parliament with equal representation from every nation."

This is not the first time Senator Bob Brown has declared that we should all accept global government and the new world order. In June 2011, Senator Bob Brown was quoted as saying “the issue of a global parliament was "conceptual" at the moment." He then went on to say that "why should Australia not be at the centre of what is inevitably going to be a global parliamentary governance down the line – if we human beings are going to live with each other on this marvellous planet of ours as we go on our joy ride of the future? Of course we are going to have to make consensus decisions."

As concerning as the above statements made by Senator Bob Brown are, what’s even more concerning is that at the moment he has the influence, power and political mandate to direct Australian foreign public policy. As a result of the close nature of the last Australian federal election, the Greens Party and the Labor party in Australia have joined forces to form government with the help of three independent senators.

So what does this mean for Australia and the Globalist agenda? Well, because we now have evidence that the government is actively seeking global government and a new world order, we can use this information to gather support and build momentum in the wider community to campaign and rally against the globalist agenda and global government. We must stop the formation of global government and we must not allow the Globalists to further influence our politicians.

Global government will only benefit the Globalists and multinational corporations. You and I are not part of the globalist agenda and will suffer the most if a global government is formed. There is now no doubt that the Globalists are seeking a formal global government and this is the most compelling evidence of how the government and globalists are seeking to establish the framework of the new world order since that famous speech made by George Bush Senior.

HULU Commercials are Brutally Honest

'This series of commercials depicts TV viewers as near-zombies with rotting brains that are too feeble-minded to pry their eyes off their TV screens…and that’s exactly what their alien overlords are looking. Is this ad hilarious? Yes. Could the aliens in the commercial stand for the ruling elite that is looking to consolidate its power by dumbing-down the population using brain-dead TV programming? You betcha.'

CNN Loses Half Its Viewers

Corporate Media Downhill Plunge Continues As Alternative Media Explodes

In the last few years the people of the world have witnessed and been a part of a mass awakening of humanity on a level never seen before.

The people are no longer standing idly by as the powers that be further seek to control every aspect of their lives.

A major part of this mass awakening has been the revelation that the corporate controlled media has literally served the military industrial complex for at least the last 20 years.

As advertisers and readers flock to the alternative media, the old dinosaur media continues its downhill plunge with CNN leading the free fall.

This fact was solidified by the recent release of the March and Q1 cable news ratings which showed CNN down a total of up to 50% and a downhill turn by all three cable news networks.

An article released on these numbers by TVNewser outlined the new ratings:

CNN bore the brunt of the downward trend the news networks experienced this month and for much of the first quarter, when compared to the busy first few months of 2011. For the month of March, CNN was down -50% in total viewers and down -60% in A25-54 viewers (Total Day). 
Although overall net traffic was down up to 21%, the fact remains that the alternative media continues their upward trend while the corporate funded lapdog media continues to plunge into oblivion.

When you consider that stations such as CNN and Fox News are receiving millions and millions of dollars of corporate advertising revenue yet failing to expand, the reality of the continual mass awakening that we now find ourselves in becomes much clearer.

News outlets that continue to server the new world order will soon be the thing of the past as real media finally breaks through the once rock solid stranglehold the powers that be have had on the media.