We Are Not Anti-Semites We Merely Oppose The Psychopathic Religion Judaism

Michelle Renouf defines Anti-Semitism and Judaism in such a new light that she tramsforms the whole of the anti-Semitic debate.

Michelle Renouf said Judaism was not a real religion but psychopathology. Why? She said the Old Testament writers were psychopathic because they created a pseudo religion in which God, the Father, gave everything to one favored son and nothing to the others. This would naturally result in the favored son becoming narcissistic and going to war against the other sons. She cited the Talmud which said that to strike a Jew for any reason was to strike God and that a rabbi won his debate against God.

Renouf defined anti-Semitism as not being genetic as many Jews falsely claim but rather as being a response to Jewish anti-Gentilism. By that she meant that people opposed Judaism as learned psychopathic behavior and not the genetic race of Jews for being born Jewish. It is the white phosphorous and Depleted Uranium and the torture and starvation of Palestinian children by Jewish adults that we oppose. This is learned behavior taught by psychopathic Jewish rabbis and political leaders to young impressionable children. And we object to the behavior of a Jewish man named Ben Shalom Bernanke who will print dollars until all wealth in the world is transferred from 7 billion non-Jews to a small group of Jewish bankers affiliated with the Israel-Rothschild Network. As Lady Renouf said, “There had to be Anti-Gentilism before there could have been anti-Semitism.” In fact she says she thinks the Jews invented the term anti-Semitism as a propaganda tool to move the debate from opposing bad Jewish behavior to hating their race.

Are we Anti-Semitic because we do not want to die of starvation after Bernanke and his co-conspirators destroy the dollar, the pound, the euro and every other currency in the world?

Those Jews who oppose free speech she says are enraged when they find those of us they want to call anti-Semites do not hate. She says she does not hate Jews. She says the Jewish problem is not with us but with the Hebrew Scriptures which excuses bad behavior as being not only acceptable but as divinely inspired. She says the Old Testament is Loveless because it incorrectly teaches God only loves the Jews.

Lady Renouf is an atheist and English. I am religious and an American. Neither of us believe the Old Testament exemplifies anything but the ravings of lunatics. We both agree there is no Judeo-Christian religion. We would both say that the Loveless and Psychopathic pseudo-religion of Judaism has nothing to do with Christianity.

Why else would she say there is no Judeo-Christian religion? Because as she said, “Judaism was never a religion but a political organization.” It does not teach us to become better people. All it does is lay claim to the property and wealth of other people who worked very hard for what they have. And these are real people. We are seven billion strong and have an equal right to life and liberty and to the fruits of our labors.

She told the story of a Jewish concentration camp survivor, a psychologist, who said the worst thing in the camps was not German cruelty but their refusal to treat the Jews as ‘Special.’

Her criticism of Christians is that they are like sheep who trust that there are no psychopaths in their midst.

Before concluding I must cite the works of Israel Finkelstein who wrote The Bible Unearthed to educate the Christian Zionists in our midst. Professor Finkelstein teaches us that:

The events of the Exodus never happened. There never was a unified Kingdom of Israel and Judah. They were two separate nations. That the Israelites were originally Canaanites who lived in the hills. That there never was a King David of Judah and there never was a Temple of Solomon. In fact there never was a Moses. The Bible writers stole the achievements of the Omrides who lived at Megido and ascribed them to David whose village Jerusalem had no more than 1,600 inhabitants.

This is the Michelle Renouf video:

Source

RT - Occupy Wall Street: Police brutality, media blackout

As Occupy Wall Street demonstrations enter their second week, over 80 people were arrested over the weekend and police brutality surges on the streets.­ Many protesters say the mainstream media is undergoing a black-out since many corporate networks sleep in the same bed with Wall Street.

More from the Lefty Fairy Pinko anti racist Brigade

Dress witches in pink and avoid white paper to prevent racism in nuseries, expert says

From the Wicked Witch of the West in the Wizard of Oz to Meg, the good witch from the Meg and Mog children's books, witches have always dressed in black. But their traditional attire has now come in for criticism from equality experts who claim it could send a negative message to toddlers in nursery and lead to racism.

Instead, teachers should censor the toy box and replace the pointy black hat with a pink one, while dressing fairies, generally resplendent in pale pastels, in darker shades. Another staple of the classroom - white paper - has also been questioned by Anne O'Connor, an early years consultant who advises local authorities on equality and diversity.

Children should be provided with paper other than white to drawn on and paints and crayons should come in "the full range of flesh tones", reflecting the diversity of the human race, according to the former teacher.

Finally, staff should be prepared to be economical with the truth when asked by pupils what their favourite colour is and, in the interests of good race relations, answer "black" or "brown". The measures, outlined in a series of guides in Nursery World magazine, are aimed at avoiding racial bias in toddlers as young as two.

According to the guides, very young children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance that nursery staff must help them "unlearn". If children develop positive associations with dark colours, the greater the likelihood that the attitude will be generalised to people, it says.

The advice is based on an “anti-bias” approach to education which developed in the United States as part of multiculturalism. It challenges prejudices such as racism, sexism and ageism through the whole curriculum and teaches children about tolerance and respect and to critically analyse what they are taught and think.

Read more...

Age of Illiteracy: Shocking 20% UK youths struggle to read

Hardons comment:
Look at the ethnicity of the pupils and the teachers? Thanks to generations of immigrants from third world countries ethnic White British (True Brit) Kids have had their educational standards brought down to a level that these immigrants a lot of which have not even mastered the English language properly can understand. That's right our kids are suffering because this was a planned policy by successive Zionist bought and paid for puppet governments and the Zionist owned media acting on the orders of their masters. Go read the The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, its all in there. 


The Goyim are only required to be serfs and servants to 'Gods Chosen People' in there New World Order and I don't need to spell out here who 'Gods Chosen People' are (Or so they think). 

Has All This Comet Elenin Hype Been a Form Of Viral Marketing for a Movie Release In The US? Preview Here. Release Date, 11/11/11:

USA: AP Labeled “Racist” For Accurately Transcribing Obama Speech

MSNBC has yet again played the race card to demonize not even criticism, but merely unsympathetic portrayal, of Barack Obama as racist after an AP writer was lambasted for accurately transcribing Obama’s Black Caucus speech.

During his speech, Obama attempted to fool the black audience into thinking he was one of them and not a paid teleprompter reader for Wall Street by dropping the g’s at the end of his words.

“Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes,” Obama lectured the audience. “Shake it off. Stop complainin’. Stop grumblin’. Stop cryin’. We are going to press on. We have work to do.”

However, after the Associated Press accurately transcribed Obama’s dropped g’s, MSNBC aired a debate segment asking whether the decision not to “clean up” Obama’s words was “racist”.

“On MSNBC, the African-American author Karen Hunter complained the news service transcribed Obama’s speech without cleaning it up as other outlets did–specifically including the “dropped g’s,” reports Yahoo News.

“Hunter called the AP’s version “inherently racist,” sparring with New Republic contributing editor and noted linguistics expert John McWhorter, who argued the g-less version “is actually the correct one,” noting that the president’s victory in the 2008 election was due, in part, to how effortlessly “he can switch into that [black] dialect.”

It goes without saying that Hunter’s claim is completely ridiculous. Obama’s dropping of his g’s was blatantly deliberate. If the AP had “cleaned up” his speech it would have been completely misleading and inaccurate.

Hunter claimed the AP transcriber didn’t “fix” Obama’s grammar because of the color of his skin, while failing to mention the fact that transcripts of George W. Bush’s speeches were routinely transcribed (accurately) by including dropped g’s and other idiosyncratic styles of speech. She then ventured further into the realms of absurdity, claiming the AP writer was using a secret “code” through which to express his racism.

Read more...

Pravda - Libya: Cameron's 2-billion-pound nightmare

What do you get when a wannabe imperialist invents a war to get out of trouble at home, straying into deep waters that he neither controls nor understands, getting embroiled in an internecine tribal conflict that spins out of control? The answer to this question is the place where the UK's David Cameron finds himself now: a 2-bn. pound nightmare.

Not so many months ago, we had David Cameron and William Hague declaring that the Libya Question was "not about removing Gaddafi" and that all it would take would be an immediate ceasefire from the Libyan Armed Forces. Not so many months ago we had David Cameron and William Hague declaring that the war would cost in the region of 200 million pounds, that there would be no NATO boots on the ground and that NATO would not arm the "rebels".

What they did not tell us was that the French and Americans had been planning this imperialist little adventure for years, what they did not tell us was that the rebel flags had been ordered well in advance from a British company, what they did not tell us was that the entire operation was indeed to remove Colonel Gaddafi, not because he posed any threat to his "rebels" (after all, what do you do when tens of thousands of marauding thugs armed with machine guns take to the streets, decapitating Negroes, chanting racist slogans, promising to ethnically cleanse Libya of Negroes, torching government buildings, raping and killing women and children and destroying public and private property?). They knew that the decision "to go in" had been taken long before the rebels strafed their own position to blame Colonel Gaddafi, they knew that their own media had been spreading lies about the Libyan Air Force bombing civilians - the one bombing civilians is NATO.

We saw the British reaction - draconian measures - when a few hundred bored schoolkids ran amok in August. One wonders whether Cameron would simply have given up and walked away from Number Ten Downing Street if they had been armed, or if someone had done to his youth what he did to Libya's.

What they did not tell us was that this entire charade is about removing Colonel Gaddafi from power because his humanitarian and developmental projects in Africa and his plan to launch a gold-based currency, the Gold Dinar, would be too costly for selfish western interests. What Cameron and Hague did not tell you is that their forces are to spend seven times more of the British tax-payers' money than they originally admitted - nearly two billion, or two thousand million or 2,000,000,000 pounds... on what?

I will tell you. They have strafed the Libyan water supply (war crime) to "break the back of the population", they have targeted the electricity grid (war crime), they have targeted private homes (war crime), they have taken out civilian structures with military equipment (war crime), they have murdered children (war crime, and they did not even apologise), they have targeted civilians (war crime). They then held a conference in Paris to divide up Libya's assets.

Read more...

Just Who The Hell is INCOG MAN? And who the fuck is John Hardon?

Does INCOG MAN belong to an evil Corporate/Nazi SS cabal — secretly plotting to oppress and re-enslave “people of color?”

FOR SOME REASON, White people just have to know who the messenger is, or else they can’t take things seriously enough, even when the facts — having nothing personally to do with the messenger — are staring them right in the face.

This weakness is used by the Jews to screw up the White race constantly. If, for example, you’re against what Israel does to the Palestinians, then you just have to be a leftist pinko anti-war type. But if you also happen to be against our White countries getting turned into third world cesspools before our own eyes, they’ll call you a racist right-winger, a hater, etc., etc., ETC.

Just look at the whole Left/Right/Democrat/Republican paradigm for chrissakes. This is the over-all Jew trick that’s ruined America’s self destiny; right along with “Political Correctism,” a social taboo cleverly promoted to cloak the International Jewish power structure. This self-censoring mind set serves both to intimidate those who might speak out, as well as persuading other Whites not to pay attention. Everybody stays silent, even those smart enough to know better.

But just who is this reclusive, invisible entity calling himself INCOG MAN? Does it really matter? Well, I could be a number of things — who can really know the source of articles, posts, comments on the Internet?

Maybe I’m an artificial intelligence construct hiding on Internet servers across the planet and not even human to begin with.

Isn’t it remotely possible the simplest answer is true – that I’m just a regular, fairly nondescript White guy, angry as hell about what’s being done to his own race and country by the lousy Khazar Jews? This subversive and criminal bunch have been kicked out of every place they’ve ever lived before — you might start to think there’s a damn good reason for that, instead of thinking about little old me.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE WHO I AM?

The only thing important is what’s going down, Jack.

– INCOG MAN

Read more...

The Latest Orchestrated Threat to America and The End of History

Have you ever before heard of the Haqqanis? I didn’t think so. Like Al Qaeda, about which no one had ever heard prior to 9/11, the “Haqqani Network” has popped up in time of need to justify America’s next war--Pakistan.

President Obama’s claim that he had Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden exterminated deflated the threat from that long-serving bogyman. A terror organization that left its leader, unarmed and undefended, a sitting duck for assassination no longer seemed formidable. Time for a new, more threatening, bogyman, the pursuit of which will keep the “war on terror” going.

Now America’s “worst enemy” is the Haqqanis. Moreover, unlike Al Qaeda, which was never tied to a country, the Haqqani Network, according to Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, is a “veritable arm” of the Pakistani government’s intelligence service, ISI. Washington claims that the ISI ordered its Haggani Network to attack the US Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, on September 13 along with the US military base in Wadak province.

Senator Lindsey Graham, a member of the Armed Services committee and one of the main Republican warmongers, declared that “all options are on the table” and gave the Pentagon his assurance that in Congress there was broad bipartisan support for a US military attack on Pakistan.

As Washington has been killing large numbers of Pakistani civilians with drones and has forced the Pakistani army to hunt for Al Qaeda throughout most of Pakistan, producing tens of thousands or more of dislocated Pakistanis in the process, Sen. Graham must have something larger in mind.

The Pakistani government thinks so, too. The Pakistani prime minister,Yousuf Raza Gilani, called his foreign minister home from talks in Washington and ordered an emergency meeting of the government to assess the prospect of an American invasion.

Meanwhile, Washington is rounding up additional reasons to add to the new threat from the Haqqanis to justify making war on Pakistan: Pakistan has nuclear weapons and is unstable and the nukes could fall into the wrong hands; the US can’t win in Afghanistan until it has eliminated sanctuaries in Pakistan; blah-blah.

Washington has been trying to bully Pakistan into launching a military operation against its own people in North Waziristan. Pakistan has good reasons for resisting this demand. Washington’s use of the new “Haqqani threat” as an invasion excuse could be Washington’s way of overcoming Pakistan’s resistance to attacking its North Waziristan provence, or it could be, as some Pakistani political leaders say, and the Pakistani government fears, a “drama” created by Washington to justify a military assault on yet another Muslim country.

Over the years of its servitude as an American puppet, the Pakistan government has brought this on itself. Pakistanis let the US purchase the Pakistan government, train and equip its military, and establish CIA interface with Pakistani intelligence. A government so dependent on Washington could say little when Washington began violating its sovereignty, sending in drones and special forces teams to kill alleged Al Qaeda, but usually women, children, and farmers. Unable to subdue after a decade a small number of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, Washington has placed the blame for its military failure on Pakistan, just as Washington blamed the long drawn-out war on the Iraqi people on Iran’s alleged support for the Iraqi resistance to American occupation.

Some knowledgeable analysts’ about whom you will never hear in the “mainstream media,” say that the US military/security complex and their neoconservative whores are orchestrating World War III before Russia and China can get prepared. As a result of the communist oppression, a signifiant percentage of the Russian population is in the American orbit. These Russians trust Washington more than they trust Putin. The Chinese are too occupied dealing with the perils of rapid economic growth to prepare for war and are far behind the threat.

War, however, is the lifeblood of the profits of the military/security complex, and war is the chosen method of the neoconservatives for achieving their goal of American hegemony.

Read more...

Fidel Castro calls Obama UN address 'gibberish'

Cuba's Fidel Castro blasted Barack Obama's speech to the United Nations as "gibberish" on Monday, saying the US president used a rambling address to justify the "unjustifiable."

In his first published column since July, the 85-year-old revolutionary icon slammed US and NATO intervention in Libya as "monstrous crimes" and said Obama -- whom he called the "yankee president" -- used a bully pulpit at the UN General Assembly last week to try and sway global opinion.

Fidel, who handed the presidency to his younger brother Raul Castro in 2006 due to a health crisis, has laid low in recent months, and his column published in state media was his first since July 3.

In Monday's piece he came out swinging, saying Obama distorted the situations in Syria, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Afghanistan, North Korea, Libya and the Palestinian conflict, and that the US leader used "a long rant to explain and justify the inexplicable and unjustifiable."

"Who understands the gibberish of the president of the United States before the General Assembly?" Castro asked.

Castro also took issue with the "fascist methods by the United States and its allies to confuse and manipulate global opinion," and said he was heartened by the "resistance" of his key allies Hugo Chavez and Evo Moralez, presidents of Venezuela and Bolivia, respectively, who criticized US and UN policy in their speeches.

"Has any nation been excluded from the bloody threats of this illustrious defender of international peace and security?" Castro said of Obama, whose UN quotes he cited extensively in his column.

"Who gave the United States such privileges?" Castro said.

He said countries must consider taking a stand at the General Assembly against the "NATO genocide in Libya," an action Castro described as one of many "flagrant violations of principles."

"Does anyone want it to be recorded that under their direction, the government of their nation supported the monstrous crimes by the United States and its NATO allies?" he said.

Washington and Havana are Cold War adversaries who have brought their mutual dislike and distrust into the 21st century, and Castro routinely makes political attacks on his ideological foe.

Source

More Main Stream Media Bullshit & Lies

British TV Broadcaster ITV use fake videogame footage, claim its authentic IRA video shooting

Are the Tribes of Europe Ready to Explode?

The Greek tragedy: no money, no hope ... Despairing middle classes could be the biggest threat to Greece's future, writes Paul Mason in Athens ... Dmitris Andreou made the last sale out of his small estate agents business in June. His wife Mary, makes her living preparing high-school students for English exams. But her living has dried up. Their savings are exhausted, their disposable income has dropped by about 50 per cent in two years, and they are angry. – UK Telegraph

Dominant Social Theme: Once the Greeks – and the PIGS generally – get used to austerity, the Eurozone will rebound.

Free-Market Analysis: This story is interesting because it is written by a mainstream journalist and actually tells the truth about Greece – that Greece, or its citizens, are ready to explode. One can extrapolate from Greece to the rest of the EU, or at least its Southern half. Push "austerity" a little further, as a solution to the "sovereign debt" crisis and all Europe may begin to detonate.

It is not just the Southern PIGS which are reeling. It is Northern Europe, too. The Northerners, especially Germany, do not want to pay for Southern profligacy. And Southern Europeans are well aware the fault does not lie with them, especially, but with elite political and financial interests.

It was not the average Greek or Spaniard who borrowed the money that has put the South in debt. The analyses of the European situation make it sound as if each individual was guilty. Not true. The Anglosphere banks arranged the lines of credit that are throttling the PIGS now.

The politicians and private interests accepted the money and buried it in Swiss bank accounts; today, everyone else has to pay. And Mary and Dmitris are well aware of who profited from the explosion of leverage in the 2000s, and who has been tasked with the clean-up.

It is even worse. What is unsaid in the article, despite its bluntness, is that the leverage was calculated to do exactly what it has done. The political and financial classes were in a sense tasked with creating what is now called the "sovereign" debt crisis and they did so deliberately.

This is never mentioned in analyses of the situation. We only read glib vignettes about austerity and predictable IMFsolutions having to do with higher taxes, reduced public benefits, a shrinking public sector and lower compensation all around, for those who still have jobs or businesses anyway.

While we often cover the unraveling EU and euro as if it is a kind of force of economic nature, we've also been careful on many occasions to point out that what occurred in Europe was instigated by financial powers at the highest level. And for years, Eurocrats have been talking about how a financial crisis was bound to occur, and that it would be used as a pretext to build a political union out of an economic one.

Just the other day, we reported on an article in the UK Telegraph that presented the latest meme – that the "guilty men" of Europe and Britain – the ones that had backed the EU project most enthusiastically – were going to walk away from the mess without ramifications.

Our problem with the article was that it didn't go far enough. There is an Anglosphere elite and it has coldly and forcefully built the EU from the ground up. These great central banking families that want one-world government are behind the current mess, but as is always the case, those who are really in charge will not be written about, or not by the mainstream media.

Read more...

Why the white, Western 'sisterhood' feels uncomfortable

The granting of the right to vote to women in Saudi Arabia is a wonderful leap forward for democracy. Yet it has induced a weird concoction of cynicism and shoulder-shrugging indifference amongst the so-called sisterhood in the West, including in the upper echelons of human-rights groups who normally campaign for this kind of breakthrough. Amnesty International sniffily says "it is no great achievement to be one of the last countries in the world to grant women the vote". Both Amnesty and the even more high-minded Human Rights Watch are serving up generous dollops of doom about this big shift in Saudi life, warning that having the vote is no "guarantee of rights" for Saudi women. Meanwhile, female members of the liberal commentariat pump out articles with headlines like "Why women in Saudi Arabia have a long way to go yet".

Why are so many people so down on this development? Of course, the "democracy" which, from 2015, Saudi women will be allowed to take part in is far from perfect; like men, they will only get to vote in occasional municipal elections for advisers to the religious Shura Council. And yes, Saudi women's lives will not magically transform overnight. In Britain in 1918, female suffrage was first only granted to women over the age of 30; it wasn't until 1928 that women got the vote on equal terms with men. And it took many more years, decades in fact, for women to become full participants in society. Yet nobody, surely, would look back at the breakthroughs won by the Suffragettes in the 1910s and say, "Well, it was a big fat waste of time giving women the right to vote when many of them couldn't aspire to anything more than housewifing drudgery". Why do we say such things in relation to Saudi Arabia?

Read more...

Get Ready for the Poverty Deniers

I knew this was coming. It's a trend I wrote about last year. As the US economy continues to struggle, the free-market, get-the-government-off-my-back organizations will become more and more insistent that unemployed Americans are losers and loafers too lazy to help themselves.

The latest evidence of this propaganda campaign surfaced a few weeks ago when the Heritage Foundation published a "report" (a word that sounds very official) asserting that the "actual standard of living of America's poor -- in terms of amenities in the home, housing, food consumption, and nutrition -- is far higher than expected."

The basic message is, "Hey things aren't so bad." Lots of people with little or no income may have a computer, TV, or a dishwasher. The logic is inescapable. How can people claim to be living at or below the poverty line when they don't have to wash dirty dishes by hand? I think proponents this idea should be referred to as "poverty deniers."

According to the Heritage folks, the word "poverty" is very misleading because it conjures up images of ragged, starving refugees in places like Somalia. This mantra is now making its way around the online universe. You can see its effect in the comments readers are posting post about news stories dealing with poverty and high unemployment. The best one I've read so far declared, "Anybody living in the USA is not poor."

It's the sort of claim that makes good campaign fodder, like holding up a copy of the want ads in front of a crowd and announcing, "Anyone who's looking for a job should just look right here!" What they never mention is that in most cities right now, dozens if not hundreds of applicants are chasing each of those job postings.

Read more...

Let the Euro and the European Union Collapse

The Central Bankers in Europe have been trying to enslave the world by fraud and a phony debt the people do not owe. Europe should just default on the derivatives, abandon the Euro altogether and arrest the bankers if they use financial terrorism as an end to a means. We are starting to see a financial insurrection world wide against the private central bankers. These bankers know they are being found out and the people in power better learn real quick that being an agent for these oligarchs will not mean they will escape justice aiding in banker fraud.

The bankers have been responsible for much of the famines and disease around the world because they see these people's lives have no value to them. The politicians or dictators in these countries are brought and paid for by these same bankers to keep these countries from ever developing industry and elevating the standard of living in these underdeveloped nations. The banking cartel has been the people behind all the unnecessary misery because they are saving mother earth is their justification. The world bank has terrorized villagers in Uganda shooting children, forcing innocent people off their land in the name of saving the planet. This was done in southern Mexico relocating the Mayans off ancient land that was theirs in the name of biodiversity. These bankers are very sick people with no regard for humanity.

The free people in the world have been defrauded by these bankers to pay a debt they do not owe them. The people in Europe should not have to do with less, pay more in higher taxes to these bankers and be impoverished to pay a phony debt . It is time we just default on the debt completely and tell the bankers no more. We are tired of the Bank of England, The Federal Reserve Bank, the IMF, The Bank of the World, the Bank of International Settlements, Wall Street and the City of London playing with our future as free people. These Bankers are not above the law and should not escape justice for their crimes against humanity. They been behind wars,mass murders and famines to achieve their means to an end. These European countries should just default completely on the debt, get out of the euro, get out of the EU and not give the bankers what they want. Let the too big to fail banks go under, life will be better without them for all of us.

Read more...

UK: Labour's mealy-mouthed 'apologies' for immigration levels are doubly insulting

Paul Waugh has highlighted how Labour have been mainlining on immigration at their conference, with former cabinet ministers falling over themselves to identify that which was obvious to the rest of us for a decade: the last government allowed too much immigration.

Being political apologies, of course, these aren't real apologies at all. Hazel Blears said that it was wrong not to put transitional arrangements in place at the time of eastern expansion of the EU – presumably to get pesky elections out the way before the barriers came down. When is uncontrolled immigration OK with Labour? When there's not an election in the offing.

She correctly highlighted the unfairness issue about access to benefits – when Labour said newcomers wouldn't be able to claim benefits, they meant "in the first period of residency"; in other words, they were lying. But she missed the point completely when she said that her party's failure on the topic was down to a "London-centric" view of the benefits that come from multiculturalism. On two counts.

First, because those of us who live in the most multicultural areas of London were never asked how we'd feel at seeing our boroughs transformed in Labour's term of office.

Secondly, and more damningly, because Labour's policy of cultural transformation via immigration wasn't an accident, but completely deliberate. Remember Labour adviser Andrew Neather's admission: that their policy was intended to "rub the Right's nose in diversity"? Which Tory activist hasn't canvassed an immigrant voter, with a poor command of English, who's been told by the Labour campaign team that their flat would be taken from them by the Conservatives? I've met several over the years. Herbert Morrison wanted to "build the Tories out of London". His descendants had the same policy, without all the fuss of building homes.

Despite all the hand-wringing now, they knew what they were doing. "Apologies" from Labour about the impact of unparalleled levels of immigration are thus doubly insulting. It is a continuation of their pre-election policy: to treat us like fools. It's also a disgraceful message to send to the hundreds of thousands of immigrants who came here at the implicit request of the government in which Ms Blears was proud to serve for so long. Ms Blears (et Labour al.) welcomed the newcomers up to the point that it was no longer politically expedient so to do.

Read more...

UK: Police inquiry over Jehovah's Witness magazine

An official magazine for Jehovah's Witnesses that described those who leave the church as "mentally diseased" is at the centre of a police inquiry, it has emerged.

Detectives are investigating whether the article, published in July’s edition of The Watchtower, is in breach of Britain’s religious hatred laws. The article, published in the magazine which is distributed by Jehovah's Witnesses across the globe, reportedly warned followers to avoid "false teachers" which it condemned as being "mentally diseased".

"Suppose that a doctor told you to avoid contact with someone who is infected with a contagious, deadly disease," part of the article stated.

"You would know what the doctor means, and you would strictly heed his warning. Well, apostates are 'mentally diseased', and they seek to infect others with their disloyal teachings." [Of course fundamental Muslims openly state that apostates should be killed but thats ok isn't it?]

A group of former Witnesses, based in Portsmouth, have made an official complaint to Hampshire Police about the article. Police have launched an investigation.

Read more...

USA: The Fed Wants You To Beg For QE3

The psychological effects of the Dow are undeniable. When the average investor or even consumer sees green, life is good, even if every other indicator in the economy clearly says otherwise. For the common Dow lemming, “green” supplants reason, mathematics, instinct, and blatant logic. If mushroom clouds came in that particular shade of bull market green, nuclear holocaust would be welcomed with beers, barbeque, and jubilee. Green in the Dollar Index is no different. Many market joyriders and MSM parrots decree victory for Team Dollar without even a remedial understanding of the implications of dollar strength being measured against multiple faltering currencies across the globe. Just because the Euro, for instance, is nearly as superfluous as the greenback, this does not mean the dollar is a stable or healthy currency by default. They are BOTH screwed. But hey, as long as that little ticker points up, all is right with the world……right?

Red is the ultimate party stopper. Red makes Americans pause and reflect. It makes them question their economic sensibilities, their political loyalties, their futures, perhaps even their choice of marriage partners or favorite football team. The sight of red in the Dow brings to mind thoughts of recession, depression, collapse. At bottom, red makes our government and the people charged with safeguarding U.S. financial good-time-tootie-fruitiness look bad. Red?!Red?! Vote the bums out!

Given this American predisposition to ignore all other indicators except the Dow and sometimes the DXY, you can imagine why the private Federal Reserve in tandem with the U.S. Treasury has focused so much of their attention on stimulus measures designed to keep these two indexes predominantly in the green since the derivatives crash of 2008. They have done this through direct and indirect injections of fiat into market systems which have acted as a buffer; multiple yet temporary patches in the hull of a scattershot ship on the verge of being swallowed by the voracious waters of the briny deep. The problem is, after over three years of this activity, the opiate of fiat is starting to lose its euphoric aftertaste. Like some dirty track-marked heroin fiend, the U.S. economy is now nervously scratching its rancid fiscal sores and screaming for more of that sweet sweet fiat juice. The more we get, the more we need later down the road to satisfy our dependency.

Read more...

The Four Horsemen - Official Trailer

We will not return to 'business as usual'. The Four Horsemen is an independent feature documentary which lifts the lid on how the world really works.

Demand the movie now: http://eventful.com/fourhorsemen
Website: http://www.fourhorsemenfilm.com
Official Facebook: http://facebook.com/fourhorsemenfilm

Coming Autumn 2011 #FourHorsemenFilm

Directed By: Ross Ashcroft

Featuring: Noam Chomsky, Max Keiser, Joseph Stiglitz, Prof. Herman Daly, Dr. Ha-Joon Chang, Simon Johnson, Michael Hudson, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, John Perkins, Tarek Al Diwany, Camila Batmanghelidjh, James Turk, David Morgan, Hugo Salinas Price and more...

UK: These terrorists should all be wearing orange jumpsuits

Call Me Dave was elected on a promise to scrap the venal European yuman rites act and replace it with a British Bill of Rights. But he says his hands are tied because his Lib Dem Coalition partners won’t let him.

Only last week, Nick Clegg nailed his colours to the yuman rites mast and declared the Act would never be abolished while he was in government. His infantile conference delegates cheered him to the rafters.

This is precisely what we have come to expect from a politician who openly admits he feels more European than British. But he’s not just the leader of a soft-headed minority party of protest, he’s Deputy Prime Minister. He has a responsibility to put the national interest before political posturing. Clegg should not be allowed to place his pro-European fanaticism ahead of the safety of the people he is paid to serve.

Yet again we have glaring evidence that the perverse rulings of Left-wing judges in human rights cases are not only an affront to natural justice but pose a clear and present danger to our national security.

It has been revealed that two of the men involved in the plot to set off suicide bombs in London on July 21, 2005, are back on the streets after serving disgracefully short prison sentences.

Eritrean national Siraj Yassin Abdullah Ali was released halfway through his nine-year jail term and is living in a bail hostel. He was photographed at the weekend boarding a London bus. Somali Ismail Abdurahman spent just three years behind bars before being freed.

Both men were convicted of providing support to the gang of five Al Qaeda terrorists who intended to repeat the carnage of two weeks earlier on the London Transport network, which claimed 52 lives and wounded hundreds of commuters.

The fact that they were let out halfway through their sentences is another shocking indictment of the deceit of our so-called criminal justice system. No one ever serves their full tariff.

In the cases of Ali and Abdurahman, their sentences were woefully inadequate in the first place. In America, they’d be serving 35 years to life, as a basis for negotiation, without prospect of parole. That’s if they didn’t get an orange jumpsuit and a one-way ticket to Club Gitmo.

We can’t even deport them to Eritrea or Somalia because the courts have decided that their lives could be in danger if they were returned home and it would therefore be an infringement of their inalienable yuman rites.

Consequently, they are free to mingle with the very people they planned to murder and the hard-pressed security services have to spend a vast amount of money and manpower to keep them under constant surveillance.

Convicted foreign terrorists routinely argue that they would face torture, or worse, if they were repatriated. The courts always take them at their word. The more heinous their crimes, the more likely they are to be believed. As a result, dozens of foreign nationals either convicted or suspected of planning atrocities are granted leave to remain. Most of them end up living in council houses on benefits, leeching off the innocent British taxpayers they want to kill. Other cases are pending.

Even if we are prevented from deporting them, at the very least we should have the right to detain them indefinitely in prison, unless they agree to leave voluntarily.

Thanks to the Human Rights Act, Britain has become a safe haven for terrorists from all over the world. British courts seem to delight in implementing the most extreme interpretations of the law. Our European ‘partners’ appear to have no such difficulty deporting undesirable aliens.

The Prime Minister has a duty to keep his election promise and repeal the Act immediately. He should defy the Lib Dems to try to stop him. Does anyone seriously believe that Clegg would collapse the Coalition simply to defend the rights of dangerous foreign terrorists and criminals to remain in Britain at taxpayers’ expense? Not unless he’s got a political death wish. Vote Lib Dem: the Terrorists’ Friends.

I’d love to see Cleggy attempt to sell that one on the doorsteps. His struggling party would be wiped out. Call Me Dave should call his bluff.

Read more...

BBC Speechless As Trader Tells Truth

'In an interview on BBC News this morning that left the hosts gob-smacked (google it... it is the BBC after all), Alessio Rastani outlines in a mere three-and-a-half-minutes what we all know and most ignore. While the whole interview is worth watching, the money shot for us was "This economic crisis is like a cancer, if you just wait and wait hoping it is going to go away, just like a cancer it is going to grow and it will be too late!".'

UK: New busybody army

Thousands of civilians have been given sweeping police-style powers allowing them to fine people and demand personal details.

Following a worrying expansion of a discredited Labour project, more than 2,200 civilians including street wardens, housing officers, traffic marshals and stewards can issue financial penalties for ‘offences’ such as dropping litter, dog fouling and truancy.

Coalition ministers have allowed the numbers signed up to the Community Safety Accreditation Scheme to grow by a third over just 12 months.

It comes despite senior Liberal Democrats and Tories strongly condemning the scheme when in opposition. Under it, councils and private sector firms pay a few hundred pounds for accreditation by the local police force. They then pay as little as £32 for each employee they want to be accredited. Those chosen undergo a short training course and are given a uniform and a special badge approved by the Chief Constable.

As well as handing out fines of up to £80, the accredited civilians – dubbed ‘Jacqui Smith’s Irregulars’ after the former Labour home secretary – can photograph members of the public and demand their names and addresses. It is an offence to refuse to provide such details when they ask. But they have no power to detain or arrest and must call a police officer or PCSO.

Read more...

UK: Families face £5,000 bill to bail out debt-stricken Euro nations

Britain could be asked to find £115billion to rescue debt-stricken countries – nearly £5,000 per household.

Fears were growing last night that the International Monetary Fund might not have enough cash for a global bailout of struggling economies. Its crisis fund may need to grow ten-fold – meaning a huge increase in contributions from the UK.

Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the IMF, said the current war chest of around £250billion ‘pales in comparison with the potential financing needs of vulnerable countries’ and needs to be expanded to deal with ‘worst-case scenarios’.

Sources in Washington said the IMF’s pot of cash could be expanded to £2.6trillion although officials in London said that figure looked ‘incredibly high’. Mrs Lagarde’s warning came as U.S. President Barack Obama said the debt crisis in Europe was ‘scaring the world’ and that eurozone leaders were not dealing with the issue quickly enough.

And a top Bank of England economist urged leaders around the world to stop the world plunging back into recession. ‘It’s doing something rather than just saying something that counts,’ said Ben Broadbent, a member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee charged with setting UK interest rates.

Britain is liable for 4.5 per cent of IMF funding – meaning it would have to contribute around £115billion to an enlarged bailout fund, or £4,600 per household. It is conceivable that figure may turn out to be slightly lower because Britain’s share is falling as rapidly growing economies such as China contribute more. Britain has already handed over £12.5billion in emergency loans to Greece, Ireland and Portugal to help prop up the euro.

Read more...

Fed Will Gather Info On Its Enemies

Two weeks ago, the media's heart went aflutter when it learned that the president had borrowed a page right out of ole' Joe McCarthy's communist witch hunt book with the launch of Attack Watch. The response by everyone, even fans of Obama, was immediate and brutal. Yet where Obama took about 24 hours to crash and burn, someone else has stepped in with a far stealthier method of ferreting out the traitors amongst us: none other than our old friends, the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States, which in a Request for Proposals filed to companies that are Fed vendors, is requesting the creation of a "Social Listening Platform" whose function is to "gather data from various social media outlets and news sources." It will "monitor billions of conversations and generate text analytics based on predefined criteria." 


The Fed's desired product should be able to "determine the sentiment [ED:LOL] of a speaker or writer with respect to some topic or document"... "The solution must be able to gather data from the primary social media platforms – Facebook, Twitter, Blogs, Forums and YouTube. It should also be able to aggregate data from various media outlets such as: CNN, WSJ, Factiva etc." Most importantly, the "Listening Platform" should be able to "Handle crisis situations, Continuously monitor conversations, and Identify and reach out to key bloggers and influencers." 


Said otherwise, the Fed has just entered the counterespionage era and will be monitoring everything written about it anywhere in the world. After all, why ask others to snitch for you and anger everyone as Obama found out the hard way, when you can pay others to create the supreme FIATtack Watch^TM using money you yourself can print in unlimited amounts. And once the Internet is completely "transparent", the Fed will next focus on telephone conversations, and finally will simply bug each and every otherwise "private" location in the world. Because very soon saying that "printing money is treason" will be treason, and such terrorist thoughts must be pre-crimed before they even occur.

Read more...

Israel and the Upcoming Nuclear War!

Heretic Productions present...; Gordon Duff's "Israel and the Upcoming Nuclear War" http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/11/israel-and-the-upcoming-nuclear-war/

Indicting The Israel Criminal Banking Network

This is a response to a powerful and poetic video trial of the Israel Criminal Banking Network. I have decided to briefly add my testimony to the court case against the Israel Crime Family. This is merely a partial outline of Zionist crimes. The Palestinians and the Lebanese can give far better evidence of Israel’s multitudinous war crimes than I could.

One man asked how do we get from here to there or from our present condition as debt slaves to free men and women sitting in judgement of the Israel Banking Network’s crimes? This first essay should make that clear.

I recently said, “FED Chairman Ben Bernanke will take over the Bailout of Rothschild owned European banks from the Germans who are resisting. Bernanke will swap trillions of dollars in freshly printed Bernanke Bucks for euro bad debts. He will continue printing dollars until the dollar, the pound and the euro are worthless.

When the Bailouts are over, you will have nothing and the Rothschilds and their fellow members of the Israel Banking Crime Family will own everything including your children.

To divert the justifiable wrath of the 7 billion non-Jews the Zionist Crime Family will then need a war to solve their problems. The obvious target being Iran.

I have said before the US military will not allow Israel to attack Iran. Let me explain why. On 911 Israel brazenly bragged of their declaration of war against America and the world. They sent live video footage of the planes hitting the North and South Towers to the Bush administration. Dr Richard Fuisz who was the CIA handler for Susan Lindauer saw those Israeli videos and immediately and rightfully concluded that Israel did 911. You might remember that on the morning of 911 Bush said he saw a video on the monitor of the first plane hitting the North Tower before he entered that classroom in Florida. The general public did not see Flight 11 crash into the North Tower until 24 hours later when the Naudet brothers documentary footage was released.

Since 911 Dr Alan Sabrosky, a former Director of Studies at the US Army War College, has come forward and publicly accused Israel of doing 911. Dr Sabrosky is partially of Jewish descent. I maintain that 911 was the third in a series of the criminal Israel Banking network crimes against America and the world.

Read more...

Proof Of NATO Cluster Bombs On Sirte

Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Very scary for the women and children in Brega, Libya.

Please read Gaddafi's 28 page, oft-mentioned, "Green Book" so you can see for yourselves what the western media has told us about Gaddafi and Libya is mostly lies. You can download a PDF of it athttp://www.mathaba.net/gci/theory/gb.htm

Illuminati Give Young Stalin a Makeover

"The evidence Montefiore willfully ignores suggests that even in his early career Stalin was already an instrument of the corporate PTB who were building up the Soviet Union as an industrial and military counter-balance to the USA."

Review by Guy Nicholls
(Edited by henrymakow.com)

In 2004 Simon Sebag Montefiore described Georgian Prime Minister Mikhail Sakashvilli as "the dashing young victor of Georgia's Rose Revolution" (1).

His biography of another Georgian, Josef Stalin, up until the Russian Revolution in 1917, was published in 2007. Young Stalin was favorably reviewed in all the establishment media. Montefiore contends that the man who Trotsky deemed a "mediocrity" was actually the master tactician and prolific fund-raiser behind the Russian Revolution.

Simon Sebag Montefiore is the scion of an old Illuminati banking family. Simon's great-great uncle, Sir Moses Montefiore, was a banking partner of N M Rothschild & Sons. The book is an attempt to paint the former Soviet dictator and mass murderer as the Robin Hood of Revolution and rebut Trotsky's charge.

Aside from failing to convince us that Stalin was more of a swashbuckling revolutionary, soon to be a major Hollywood movie, Montefiore fails in a number of other ways to rehabilitate his subject.

Indeed, though it might be highly entertaining as a novel; from an historical point of view, a vast lacunae of unanswered questions lies at the heart of the book. Though Montefiore was given access to the Rothschild archive and newly released Georgian documents, the book is thoroughly and deliberately under-researched.

THE MONTEFIORES
Banker Moses Montefiore (1784-1885) was one of the founding fathers of the Jewish Freemasonic group, B'nai B'rith, and an active Zionist in the nineteenth century (4). Montefiore visited Palestine seven times during his lifetime and also paid a visit to Russia in 1872. Trotsky himself was a B'nai B'rith member having joined in New York from whence he sailed for Russia in 1917 with Wall Street gold.

Readers will find little depth to the coverage here of far more significant sources of finance behind the Bolsheviks than supposed master bank-robber, Stalin (5). Wall Street financier, Jacob Schiff and the Warburg group as well as the Rothschild agent, Alexander Parvus are airbrushed in this account. These men --the true shapers of history-- do not figure in Young Stalin.

Parvus had been a pioneer of the permanent revolution tactics used in the Young Turk Revolution in 1908. This turned out to be the Judaeo-Masonic rehearsal for the Russian Revolution. According to Solzhenitsyn, Parvus taught Lenin and Trotsky as well as the German High Command how a small clique could seize power in Russia (6).

Parvus was an instrument of the powers of "Alien High Finance" described by Ivor Benson (7). According to Benson, financiers like the Warburgs, Rothschilds and Montefiores were able, by Stalin's time, to control politics on an international basis. In other words-though of course Simon Sebag isn't going to tell us this - an illegitimate financial elite is the true power behind figures like Stalin and Hitler in the last century!

WHO WAS STALIN'S FATHER?
A number of conspiracy researchers like Cliff Shack hoped Montefiore would shed light on Stalin's relationship with the Rothschilds (8). Shack along with another researcher, Greg Hallett, has suggested that Stalin was fathered by Edmond de Rothschild who in his capacity as a wine entrepreneur had been let loose in Georgia, a country which, according to Montefiore-"virtually floated on wine" (9).

There he may well have come into contact with Yakov Egnatashvilli the prosperous Georgian wine merchant for whom Stalin's mother worked. Alas, we can only wonder why the possibility that Stalin was a Rothschild bastard remains unexplored by Montefiore!

Montefiore describes Stalin's elation in 1902 when he secured a job in the Rothschilds' Batumi refinery and how within days he had burned down the warehouse (11). We can only speculate about the secret evidence Montefiore tells us exists re-"the secret contact with the Rothschild management-the start of his murky relationship with the oil barons" .

Despite his having access to the family archive, we never learn whether Stalin was a paid saboteur FOR or AGAINST the Rothschild oil interests. Nor do we discover how long his relationship with the "Franco-Jewish dynasty", as Montefiori quaintly refers to them lasted. He tells us about the protection rackets Stalin ran to extort money for the Bolshevik cause from the oil tycoons. We also learn that he enjoyed the protection of the manganese-mining tycoons (12) but due to Montefiore's irritating intellectual fan-dancing, this crucial part of Stalin's career remains murky.

It is, however, illuminating to discover that once in power in 1925, Stalin farmed out contracts for the development of Soviet oil to the Rockefellers whereby in return for financing his Five Year Plans, they got a half-interest in Soviet oil including the Baku field.

In the same year Stalin also allowed the Harriman interests and Guarantee Trust to develop and exploit the Georgian manganese mines at Chiatura. Montefiori notes that Stalin had been active at Batumi, Baku and Chiatura before the Revolution, but he does not touch on the relationships Stalin may well have cultivated with the US financial oligarchy at this time. Anthony Sutton found that US-built infrastructure and technology were crucial to subsequent Soviet industrial development (13).

The evidence Montefiore willfully ignores suggests that Stalin even in his early career in the oilfields was already becoming an instrument of the corporate PTB who were building up the Soviet Union as an industrial and military counter-balance to the USA. Montefiore with the Rothschild archive at his finger-tips merely signs off on his threadbare coverage with the suggestion that Stalin was "probably" still on their payroll in 1907 (14)!

STALIN AND THE FABIANS
The London Conference of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party was hosted by the Fabians during April-May 1907. The fact that London was a training ground at this time for foreign subversives and terrorists much like the "Londonistan" we know today is alluded to by Montefiore who likens the Bolsheviks at that time to jihadis today (15). Characteristically Montefiore keeps the real purpose of Stalin's visit and the connections between the early Bolsheviks and the British Fabians vague.

Evidently Stalin's terrorist exploits had so alienated his fellow Georgians that none of his delegation had voting rights. The Bolsheviks had been routed in Georgia and Party finances were at a low ebb. Nevertheless the Conference was covered by the tabloids which reflected the vicarious fascination the British had for these exotic swarthy anarchists from the East (6)!

Every day Okhrana agents and British Special Branch kept eyes on the subversives. Whether Stalin received training from British military intelligence on this visit or subsequently as Greg Hallett has suggested, is another off-limits topic area for Montefiore (13).

STALIN: KHAZAR BANDIT ON THE LOOSE!
Pictured wearing a scarf resembling a Jewish prayer shawl Stalin's dashing (Sakashvilli-like) features stare out from the cover of the book. Montefiore's coverage of the spectacular Tiflis bank raid Stalin organized on his return to Georgia from London in 1907 implants the image of the romantic young brigand in our minds. Yet just what dividends for the Bolshevik revolutionary cause did Stalin's repertoire of permanent revolution tactics achieve?

Notwithstanding all Stalin's "shakedowns, currency counterfeiting, extortion, bank robberies, piracy and protection rackets-as well as political agitation and journalism" the Bolsheviks were still losing support and desperate
for money.

Despite Stalin's much flair vaunted flair as a "super-conspirator" (256) the Bolsheviks were deeply penetrated by Okhrana double agents. Stalin himself fell victim to their machinations in 1913 when he was betrayed by Malinovsky and sent to Siberia ( 278-281).


WERE STALIN AND THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION A FRAUD?
By his failure to address the question of how far Stalin's links with international finance may have been forged early in his career, Montefiore has in fact answered the question that lies at the heart of this book.

For Montefiore admits that if Stalin had been a "phoney," then the whole Soviet experiment must have been a fraud too (228)!. To an establishment historian, the possibility of answering both questions in the affirmative is unthinkable. To the rest of us-as well as all his millions of victims-no amount of execrable poetry and vicarious revelations about his romantic liaisons should be allowed to deceive into thinking otherwise!

Read more...