Planned Peacekeeper Occupation Of Libya

The peacekeepers are coming! The peacekeepers are coming! War, mass killing and destruction continue, but they're coming! In fact, paramilitaries are coming to kill and terrorize Libyans wanting liberation, not occupation. A blind eye won't notice mass rapes and sex trafficking, as well as other atrocities and crimes. They're commonplace, in fact, when Blue Helmets show up, operating as they please with impunity. More on that below. 

Moreover, when they come they don't leave as long as imperial powers want them there. Citizens of occupied countries have no say nor any rights. Their choice is obey or else. Libya's corpse belongs to NATO. It's now Libya, Inc. to be carved up for profit with paramilitaries deployed for enforcement. Under the UN Charter, the Security Council may act to maintain international peace and security, including by deploying peacekeepers host countries request. 

The UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations then enlists member states to provide contingents once the Security Council approves. In place, they're supposed to restore order, monitor the withdrawal of combatants, maintain peace and security, build confidence, enforce power-sharing agreements, provide electoral support, aid reconstruction, uphold the rule of law, facilitate economic and social development, help provide essential needs, and remain in place until government officials take over on their own. 

A previous article called them occupiers, serving power, not popular interests in Haiti, South Lebanon, Rwanda, Kosovo, Bosnia, DRC Congo, Sudan, Somalia, various other countries, and its initial UN Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) since 1948. Like elsewhere, it, too, failed to bring peace to Palestine. Yet it's still there, performing no active role. In fact, it opposes the interests of the people they're sworn to protect. 

Since 1948, dozens of "peacekeeping" missions did more harm than good. At present, 16 Blue Helmet operations are deployed on four continents. They include:

UNMISS in South Sudan, beginning on July 9, 2011 after the country was balkanized as part of an imperial scheme to prevent African unity, and exploit its resources - mainly oil; 

UNISFA in Sudan's Abysei region bordering the North and South, beginning on June 27, 2011; 

MONUSCO in the Democratic Republic of Congo, replacing an earlier MONUC operation on July 1, 2010; 

UNAMID in Darfur, beginning July 31, 2007; UNOCI in Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast), beginning April 4, 2004; 

UNMIL in Liberia, beginning September 19, 2003; MINURSO in Western Sahara since 1991; 

UNMIT in Timor-Leste since 2006; UNMOGIP Observer Group in India and Pakistan since 1949; 

UNAMA (special political) Assistance Mission in Afghanistan since March 2011; UNFICYP in Cyprus since 1964; 

UNMIK in Kosovo since 1999; 

UNDOF in Golan since 1974; UNIFIL in Lebanon since 1978; 

UNTSO in Palestine since 1948; and MINUSTAH in Haiti since 2004 after US marines ousted democratically elected Jean-Bertrand Aristide. From inception, it had no legitimacy. In fact, it was the first time UN occupiers enforced coup d'etat authority against an elected president, instead of staying out or backing his right to return. 

MINUSTAH, in fact, symbolizes the sham hypocrisy of all Blue Helmet missions and why occupied people deplore them. 

UNIFIL in Lebanon never established peace and security. It did little more than take up space or get out of the way when Israel attacked. 

UNMIK in Kosovo hid the grim reality of NATO terror bombing, mass killing, destruction, and balkanization of Serbia. In fact, it collaborated with Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) thugs, its leader Hashim Thaci, and their connection to organized crime. In January 2008, Thaci, in fact, became Kosovo's illegitimate prime minister, a gangster running a rogue state. 

MONUSCO in Congo never brought peace and security. It facilitated the plunder of Africa's most resource-rich country. It did nothing to stop the immiseration of millions, nor was it deployed to do so. 

Credible reports, in fact, linked Blue Helmet forces with mass rapes and other atrocities. The same ugly story repeats wherever Blue Helmets show up. 

In December 2004, London Times reports suggested UN staffers committed 150 or more sex crimes, including selling pornographic videos and photos, images of their handiwork. Congolese women and girls were raped. 

Congo's Minister of Defense, Major General Jean Pierre Ondekane, said peacekeepers in Kisangani would be remembered "for running after little girls," not doing their job. 

Two or more UN officials left after impregnating local women. In fact, sex trafficking, abuse and rape are commonplace wherever Blue Helmets are deployed. They have power. Occupied people don't. Who'll stop them no matter what they do. They take full advantage, terrorizing local people with impunity.

Read more...

The Global Bankers' FDR: A Communist Fellow Traveller (part 1 of 5)

When the peoples of Europe who escaped to the West in advance of the communist onslaught at the close of World War II are asked the question as to ‘what happened to their people and countries at the end of the War’, an overwhelming majority will say that their nations were ‘sold out’ to the communists and Soviet dictator Premier Joseph Stalin by American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR).

Today some historians recognize that this acquiescence was a tragic mistake whereby over one hundred million people and their nations in Eastern and Central Europe were left to Stalin’s mass murdering and enslaving Soviet communists, while others will state that it was the ‘cost of doing business’. However, ignored is not the question of what happened, but rather the question of whether this FDR action was just part of the continuum of the global bankers’ hidden geo-political agenda. 

This essay looks briefly at the influence these bankers had on FDR’s mentors, Woodrow Wilson’s presidency, and their continued influence on FDR’s policies and actions, including the establishment of post World War II boundaries in Europe.

Historians generally acknowledge that the post World War II fate of the Central and Eastern European peoples and nations who fell into the Soviet Union’s sphere of power was sealed when Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Soviet dictator Stalin (Iosif Dzugashvili) at the Big Three Conferences at Tehran [November 1943] and Yalta [February 1945]. Some will sympathize with Roosevelt at Yalta because he suffered from polio, and by then was in very poor health; thus he was no match for that aggressive ‘little man of steel’ Stalin. Meanwhile, the other potential protector of Europe, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill, is often portrayed as a tired man; tired of the war, representing an exhausted nation which no longer was a match for the two new superpowers of the world.

This essay sets the hypothesis that a ‘weak’ Roosevelt was not outfoxed in a situational confrontation with Stalin, but rather his seeming deference to the Soviet communists was consistent with the Democratic Party’s own collectivist approach, which accepted and promoted the totalitarian, ‘one world government’ philosophy and solutions of the global bankers. This essay looks at how FDR’s philosophical slant was harmonized with his World War II ally Stalin, and with the Soviet Union’s communists. 

Read more...

London Philharmonic Suspends Musicians for anti-Israel Remarks

A report in UK daily The Guardian stated that the London Philharmonic Orchestra has suspended four of its musicians for nine months for adopting its name when they called for the cancellation of an Israeli orchestra’s concert at the Royal Albert Hall.

According to the Guardian, the orchestra suspended cellist Sue Sutherley, as well as violinists Tom Eisner, Nancy Elan and Sarah Streatfeild until June 2012, after they signed a letter as members of the LPO condemning the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra as an instrument of Israeli propaganda.

The musicians’ statement claimed that “denials of human rights and violations of international law are hidden behind a cultural smokescreen. The IPO is perhaps Israel’s prime asset in this campaign”, and that Israel’s policy toward the Palestinians “fits the UN definition of apartheid.”

The Guardian’s report states that both Orchestra chief executive Tim Walker, as well as chairman Martin Hohmann released a statement regarding the suspensions, which were meant to send a “strong and clear message that their actions will not be tolerated … the orchestra would never restrict the right of its players to express themselves freely, however such expression has to be independent of the LPO itself.”

Read more...

Lets look at the truth about the so called ‘Doctor’:

The Destruction of the White Race, who's behind it and why!

The Psychic Pronouncements of Zionist Jews

The influential Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann, co-founder of the World Jewish Congress alongside fellow arch-Zionist Rabbi Stephen Wise (who, in the year 1900, stated that public perception of 6,000,000 suffering Jews would be handy in promoting sympathy for Zionism [1]), admitted in his book, The Jewish Paradox (published in 1976), that years before the end of the Second World War two influential co-conspiring Jews conceived the idea of a post-war Nuremberg show-tribunal and “German reparations” to be paid out to the Jews. Goldmann candidly admits that he, and his fellow scheming Zionists at the World Jewish Congress, intended the reparations to finance Jewish settlement in Palestine after the war. [2]
The conniving Zionist crook, Nahum Goldmann, made an astonishing prediction in June of 1940, only nine months after the Second World War began. He declared that if the Nazis were to achieve final victory “6,000,000 Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction.” [3] The Nazis were not victorious however, but that didn’t stop the deceptive and cunning Zionist propagandists from claiming exactly six million had died anyway.


Was another Zionist big-wig, Max Nordau, also born with the gift of foresight? At the sixth Zionist Congress convened in 1903, eleven years before World War I began and forty-five years before the nation of Israel was formed, Nordau just happened to be cognizant of an impending “world war,” and that “a free and Jewish Palestine” would be created with England’s assistance. [4] In 1914 World War I commenced as Nordau had predicted; in 1917 the British diplomat Arthur James Balfour decreed the “Balfour Declaration” promising the Jews a homeland in Palestine, as Nordau predicted they would. [5] In 1911 during the tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland Nordau made another astonishing prediction: 6,000,000 Jews would be annihilated. [6] Of course, no such thing as the annihilation of 6,000,000 Jews ever happened–the Zionists simply made the propaganda fit the prophecy. [7]


The aforementioned Nahum Goldmann also attended the tenth Zionist Congress in 1911 where that prediction was uttered. [8] As a side note: Goldmann was fingered as the arch-plotter behind the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in the book, Opium Lords: Israel, The Golden Triangle and the Kennedy Assassination. [9]

Read more...

Good is Evil

Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Resigns Over Global Warming

The global warming theory left him out in the cold.

Dr. Ivar Giaever, a former professor with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, abruptly announced his resignation Tuesday, Sept. 13, from the premier physics society in disgust over its officially stated policy that "global warming is occurring."

The official position of the American Physical Society (APS) supports the theory that man's actions have inexorably led to the warming of the planet, through increased emissions of carbon dioxide.

Giaever does not agree -- and put it bluntly and succinctly in the subject line of his email, reprinted at Climate Depot, a website devoted to debunking the theory of man-made climate change.

"I resign from APS," Giaever wrote.

Giaever was cooled to the statement on warming theory by a line claiming that "the evidence is incontrovertible."

"In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?" he wrote in an email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society.

"The claim … is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this 'warming' period," his email message said.
A spokesman for the APS confirmed to FoxNews.com that the Nobel Laureate had declined to pay his annual dues in the society and had resigned. He also noted that the society had no plans to revise its statement.

Read more...

AMERICA TODAY

Doug Hardman wakes up every morning with a song in his head—a vague memory of his days on stage.

Inside his tepee in the woods outside Lakewood, NJ, at the homeless Tent City, the roosters wake early and the mornings are already cooler. A musician who lost his Florida home in the housing crisis, Hardman says he floats in and out of Tent City, that he's proud of his kids, and misses the life he no longer has.

He has a lot of company out here.
Click here for the pictures and story >


Tent City made the news recently and while community leader Steven Brigham says the media attention brought in greater donations, it also brought unwanted attention from the local politicians.

After battling with the city for years to have access to the public land here, Brigham found a New Jersey lawyer to represent his case pro bono.

The attorney, Jeff Wild, argued that the homeless population are part of the public and should therefore have access to public lands. Rather than take the case to court, Lakewood City Council settled, and Brigham signed an agreement to put up no more shelters and allow no more than 70 people to stay.

But last winter the community put up three wooden structures to house everyone and keep them warm.

"We didn't lose anybody last year," Brigham says, "and nobody got sick."

This year could be different. After City Council members saw the shelters on TV, they sent demolition crews in. The walls were torn down around whatever was inside, and meager furnishings were left to the elements.

Read more...

Israel: “Ungrateful [US] Ally”

The recently published comments by former US Secretary of Defense, who served also as the CIA Chief in an earlier administration, that Israel was “ungrateful ally,” warrant a serious review of the one-sided US/Israel relationship. Especially, since this statement is coming from a person who is considered as a good friend of Israel.

Gate was irate for despite the vast US financial aid, unconditional US support at all international forum, supplying Israel with the latest US defense technologies, financing Israel’s missile defense system, sharing of high level intelligence data, insatiable Israel was still ungrateful.

In layman terms: former Secretary Gate articulated the frustration of many US officials with regards to Israel’s arrogant and blatant indifference to US strategic interest in the world.

For instance, Israel was known to having turned around and shared US technology with potential US adversaries. In the early 1990s, Israel provided China with “back door” access to sensitive technology related to the US Patriot missile program.

According to American intelligence, China used the American technology to improve its surface to air missiles, and likely incorporated countermeasures in its ballistic and cruise missiles to overcome the US missile defense program. In early 2000, notwithstanding US expressed displeasure, Israel sold China Harpy Killer, unmanned anti radar drones.

In mid 1980s Israel was also suspected of sharing sensitive intelligence information with the Soviet Union in exchange for releasing Jewish dissidents and easing the immigration of Soviet Jews to Israel. Israel acquired the sensitive US information illegally from indicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard. Pollard, a Jewish American was granted Israeli citizenship while in US jail, and a Jerusalem park was renamed after Pollard rewarding him for spying on Israel’s only benefactor.

Read more...

The 9/11 Decade - The Image War

A PR stunt which killed thousands and launched a propaganda war that has, so far, lasted a decade. Since 9/11, how far has the US and al-Qaeda been prepared to go to win 'hearts and minds' with elaborate media strategies?

USA: The Zionist Sexualisation of Children continues.

New York Fashion Week was plunged into controversy today after a six-year-old was allowed to gyrate in skimpy clothing on the catwalk.

Shocking pictures emerged of a spray-tanned Eden Wood, who shot to fame after appearing on TLC reality show Toddlers & Tiaras, dancing provocatively in hotpants and a crop top at a show for children's footwear brand Cicciabella.

The images are likely to trigger outrage from parents across America, and raise questions about why Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week is allowing such a show to take place.

California-based psychotherapist Dr Tina Payne Bryson, who is co-author of The Whole-Brain Child, believes that Eden's oversexualised behaviour could lead to serious problems in teens and adulthood.

She told MailOnline: 'My main concern is two-fold. First, she has been taught and shown how to be sexy--to dance and walk and look (and even strip a layer!) like a sexy adult woman. She has been sexualised well before she has the social, psychological or relational maturity or development to understand the power of sexuality.

'And related, consider the implications of behaving and acting sexy as she matures around males. Sexualiding a child before they are emotionally and psychologically ready makes it difficult for them to handle the kind of sexual attention they get from men.

'Two, she is getting so much positive reinforcement for how she looks and how sexy she is. How is her brain wiring up her own expectations for who she is and what people value about her?'

Read more...

UK: Cost of basics in your shopping basket up 10%

More than a third of shopping basket essentials have shown punishing price rises of at least 10 per cent in a year. Fourteen out of 34 of the biggest selling foods have posted budget-busting price hikes, with some favourites – including beef mince, coffee and corn flakes – up by more than 30 per cent. The figures, compiled by shopping site mySupermarket, show that the total cost of a typical basket of food is 6.1 per cent higher than it was a year ago.

As a result, a household spending £100 a week to put food on the table in 2010 will now have to find another £317 this year to serve up the same meals. Research by retail analysts Mintel shows shoppers feel cheated over food price rises. A spokesman said: ‘Almost half of adults believe that retailers are using inflation as a cover to maintain their profits. This cynicism is shared by men and women of all ages.’

The mySupermarket research shows an annual increase of 34 per cent on beef mince – taking it up from £1.64 to £2.20 for 500g. A 500g jar of Dolmio Bolognese Sauce is up 17 per cent to £1.94, while a 200g jar of Nescafé Original Coffee Granules is up by a third to £4. Supermarket own-label corn flakes are up 37 per cent to £1.29, while vegetable oil is up 22 per cent.

The study did pick out some sharp falls on baked beans, eggs, milk, cauliflower and grapes. But it also provides evidence that products are shrinking.

And it is not just food which has been affected. Procter & Gamble has reduced the number of baby wipes in its Pampers packs from 63 to 56, while PZ Cussons, makers of Imperial Leather soap, have reduced the size of a bar by a fifth.

Industry research shows many are coping simply by buying less food, with total food purchases down 0.8 per cent on a year ago. Others are moving to cheaper products and switching to budget retailers like Aldi, where sales have leapt by a quarter. Household energy bills are also growing as families, pensioners and others face the biggest cost of living squeeze since the 1920s.

Read more...

Riddle in the sands

Peru’s Nazca Lines, the mysterious geoglyphs etched into the desert centuries ago by indigenous groups, are world famous – and now thousands of similar patterns have been found in the Middle East.

Satellite and aerial photography has revealed mysterious stone ‘wheels’ that are more numerous and older than the Nazca Lines in countries such as Syria, Saudi Arabia and Jordan. The structures are thought to date back 2,000 years, but why they were built is baffling archaeologists and historians.

‘In Jordan alone we've got stone-built structures that are far more numerous than the Nazca Lines, far more extensive in the area that they cover, and far older,’ David Kennedy, a professor of classics and ancient history at the University of Western Australia, told Live Science.

He added: ‘People have probably walked over them, walked past them, for centuries, millennia, without having any clear idea what the shape was.’

The local Bedouin, a nomadic people found in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Libya, Egypt and Israel, call them the ‘works of the old men’. They are often found on lava fields – but don’t fall into any pattern, according to Kennedy, whose research into them will be published in an upcoming issue of the Journal Of Archaeological Science.

Read more...

UK govt. kicks off Libya's exploitation

British Prime Minister David Cameron has taken the lead in negotiating with the new Libyan government in a bid to secure lucrative contracts for his government.

Following French foreign minister Alain Juppe's comments that it was “fair and logical” to grant slices of Libyan oil prize to those governments that first helped the Libyan revolutionaries, Cameron and French president, Nicholas Sarkozy, have arrived in the Libyan capital on what is considered to be the first visit by foreign leaders to the post-revolution Libya.

While more and more revelations are being made about secret dealings between the overthrown Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi and the British government, Cameron claims that the British government is after securing a better future for the Libyan people and keeps calling for Gaddafi to “give himself up” and “face justice.”

Cameron's comments come as leaked documents discovered in the abandoned office of Gaddafi's foreign minister, Musa Kusa, have confirmed the significant role of British government's intelligence agents in delivering Libyan revolutionaries to Gaddafi on several occasions.

Nevertheless, Cameron has claimed that his government will provide the Libyan revolutionaries with financial and military assistance. He even went as far as to claim the British government would set an example for others.

The world's public is now more aware of the British government's hypocrisy as it claimed that launching the war in Libya was for humanitarian purposes. Now the international community has realized that exploiting the country's vast oil resources is at the top of the British government's agenda.

Several political analysts have voiced their concerns over Libya's future as the British and French governments have initiated the long process of Western powers' exploiting Libya's resources.

Analysts believe that the new Libya would look like Iraq in the upcoming years. They believe the Western leaders' political interference in Libya's affairs and the exploitation of its resources would create an insecure and economically feeble Libya like post-invasion Iraq.

Source

Looters in suits

Three years ago this week, the collapse of the American investment bank Lehman Brothers signalled the onset of the global financial crisis, which has since escalated into a sovereign debt nightmare, boiling around us still.

In response to the financial services industry’s manic greed and incompetence, the British Government last year established the Independent Commission on Banking. On Monday, the commission published its final report, calling for Britain’s banks to be broken up, ring-fencing their retail arms from the investment ‘gambling’ operations.

Looters steal alcohol, cigarettes and other items from a Sainsbury's 

in the August riots: should today's bankers be considered any differently?

So far so good. But then the rocket fizzles out abruptly: reform need not be implemented for eight years. Some of us will be dead, for God’s sake, before anything happens. Barclays’ chief executive, Bob Diamond, declared emolliently that the commission’s report represents ‘a step towards greater clarity’. 

I have read enough to know that if I was drowning and needed a kindly hand, I would plead with Tony Soprano or Darth Vader before trying Diamond.

This is the man, you will remember, who told a House of Commons committee earlier this year that ‘the time for remorse is over’ about bankers’ excesses and who picked up a share-based bonus of £6.5 million last year, in addition to £250,000 basic salary, as well as having the potential to pick up a further £6.75 million in performance-related share options.

When Diamond shows that he thinks the Government’s plans for banking not too bad, the rest of us get the message: these princes of greed and amorality are off the hook again.

Read more...

USA: "This Is A Two Party Dictatorship Unless You're A Billionaire!"

Britain a safe haven for war criminals

The British government has taken another measure in favour of Israeli regime, as it announced legal reform, which would make it tougher to arrest the suspected war criminals.

Britain, being under constant pressure from Israel, amended a law on Thursday making it tougher for the ordinary people and anti-war activists to get arrest warrant against those who are suspected of committing human rights abuses in other countries.

Since 2001, UK's universal jurisdiction law has given the power to British courts to prosecute suspected war criminals and torturers, even if their alleged crimes took place in another country. The principle of the law goes back to the belief that some crimes including genocide, torture and hostage-taking must be fought wherever the criminal can be arrested.

Now, the legal reform has angered ordinary citizens and human rights campaigners, believing the amendments would keep the criminals away from justice.

Geoffrey Robertson, a UN judge who has delivered main verdicts on war crimes, said, "This marks a backward, nervous step by the U.K., which is reluctant to bring tyrants and torturers to justice if it suits the government to sell them arms or to turn a blind eye to their human rights violations."

Amnesty International also accused the British government of planning to give war criminals "a free ticket to escape the law.”

Israel has been urging the British government to amend its legal law, after former foreign minister Tzipi Livni cancelled a visit to Britain in 2009, fearing arrest over crimes committed during Gaza war.

A spokesman for the Israeli embassy said, "The cloud that has hung over the UK's ability to play a role in our area has been lifted, and should no longer cast a shadow over the diplomatic relationship between our two countries.

"We are hopeful that this correction will finally close that loophole which was abused by opportunistic groups promoting their sinister purposes."

Moreover, UK ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould called Livni to inform her about the new legal amendment. He claimed that Britain's justice system could no longer be abused for political reasons.

"The change will ensure that people cannot be detained when there is no realistic chance of prosecution, while ensuring that we continue to honour our international obligations," he added.

In 2007, Israeli public security minister Avi Dichter was forced to refuse an invitation from British officials after being informed he would be detained for his part in the assassination of a Hamas leader, killing 14 people, including nine children. 

Source

USA: Congress Contemplates Draconian Punishment for Internet Lies.

'Imagine that President Obama could order the arrest of anyone who broke a promise on the Internet. So you could be jailed for lying about your age or weight on an Internet dating site. Or you could be sent to federal prison if your boss told you to work but you used the company's computer to check sports scores online. Imagine that Eric Holder's Justice Department urged Congress to raise penalties for violations, making them felonies allowing three years in jail for each broken promise. Fanciful, right?

Think again. Congress is now poised to grant the Obama administration's wishes in the name of "cybersecurity."

The little-known law at issue is called the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. It was enacted in 1986 to punish computer hacking. But Congress has broadened the law every few years, and today it extends far beyond hacking. The law now criminalizes computer use that "exceeds authorized access" to any computer. Today that violation is a misdemeanor, but the Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet this morning to vote on making it a felony.'

Read more...

Lazy householders are to blame for high energy bills - Chris (I'm all right Jack) Huhne

Chris Huhne has risked insulting millions of hard-up homeowners by saying that they are to blame for paying high-energy bills.

The Energy Secretary said families 'do not bother' to hunt for bargains on gas and electricity, but would rather spend more time looking for a cheap toaster. He also said people could save up to £300 if they made the effort and could use the spare money to go on a short weekend mini-break.

The Liberal Democrat said: 'They frankly spend less time shopping around for a bill that's on average more than £1,000 a year than they would shop around for a £25 toaster.

'If they got that in perspective and said, 'OK, we are going to spend a little bit of time shopping around' [they] could save very substantial amounts of money,' he said in an interview with the Times. Mr Huhne said 85 per cent of households do not shop around, and challenged customers not to 'just sit back and take it and succumb to the myth that all energy tariffs are the same'.

His comments came after energy firm EDF announced a 15.4 per cent jump in gas tariffs as it became the last of the major suppliers to put up prices. Average electricity tariffs will also rise by 4.5 per cent in changes that will come into effect on November 10 and reflect rising wholesale energy, network and other costs.

EDF's decision means that all of the big six power suppliers have now raised their tariffs for the coming winter. The firm said the higher charges will add about 33p a day to a dual-fuel bill, while the annual cost of a standard dual-fuel bill paid for by direct debit will rise to £1,165 against £1,051 previously.

Read more...

Glad I Left Decadent England

English ex-pat David Richards, 24, lives near the beach (left) in Dalian in Northeast China. He contrasts the civility of life there with the decadence of
Brighton Beach and English life in general.

by David Richards
(henrymakow.com)

Two cities I have visited, Brighton in England and Dalian in China, possess beaches that are startlingly similar. Yet the behavior by each set of holiday-goers couldn't be more different.

Dalian beach is a wholesome environment where families relax and elderly people do Tai Chi. Brighton beach is a scene of vice and depravity, hosting drug-fuelled raves and gay sex.

I currently live in Dalian, a prosperous coastal city in North Eastern China. The city has many beaches to cater for wealthy Chinese holiday-goers.

One particular beach is very reminiscent of a traditional English seaside holiday. There is a fairground with a rickety Ferris wheel, bumper cars and arcade games. There are stalls selling candyfloss and ice cream. Extended families play card games under parasols and children play in rock pools.

The beach is also pebbled and has a pier; characteristics that make it look virtually identical to Brighton beach. The similarity ends there.

BRIGHTON
Brighton is a liberal paradise housing all kinds of alternative lifestyles, sexual experimentation and drug use. The city is known as the gay capital of England and has a large permanent gay community. Every year it hosts a world-renowned gay pride festival.

It is the sort of place you don't blink twice seeing a 6 foot 5 black-transsexual in a mini-skirt down your local grocery store.

I visited the city because I have some friends and an aunt who lived there. During my time in the city I stayed in different homes and youth hostels, meeting a lot of people. Most were into drugs and/or various new age ideas.

The locals are very sexually promiscuous and proud of it, mistaking their fixation on their carnal desires as the height of liberty.

I wasn't comfortable with Brighton's promiscuity. I lost my virginity when I was 19, and while that doesn't seem very old in retrospect, by the standards of my generation it is very late.

I lost it late not due to any lack of desire or opportunities, but because I couldn't work with the mating rituals of my generation, namely getting drunk and kissing random people and then 'seeing' each other. I would talk to a girl and like her, but recoil when she would get drunk at a party and stumble towards me like a zombie, expecting us to kiss in front of 15 onlookers. I couldn't butcher sex from intimacy.

Being a virgin in a promiscuous generation riddled me with doubts and insecurities. What was wrong with me? Why couldn't I act on my desire? The longer my virginity went on, the insecurities built up like water against a dam.

I was still virgin when I lived in Brighton so I found the open sexuality of the city provocative.

English girls are out of control wherever you go but more so in Brighton. One example sticks in my mind.

I went to a bar on the pier with a large group of young people who all worked together. One of the guys was apparently quite a player and slept with many girls. A big-breasted blonde girl in the group was furious with him for some unspecified reason, and when he went to the toilet she started screaming and shouting obscenities about him- that he was nasty and treated people badly etc- and then spat in his pint (which he returned to and drank). Later in the night she went home with him!

I was in Brighton during the gay pride festival (left.) It featured floats representing the gay community from all over the world. When I was there Amnesty International sponsored a pink tank to drive through the city, on top of it were lesbians with crew cuts drinking cans of lager and laughing like hyenas. I couldn't work out what they were celebrating, as no one in Brighton is homophobic. Who were they in defiance of? It seemed to me to be their own sense of inadequacy.

Most of the gay men you see in Brighton are not like the funny charming ones on TV; they're largely ugly middle-aged men who smell of alcohol. They stand outside bars smoking, leering at every young guy that walks past.

On the night of the festival many non-gays also come out. The locals view it as their own Mardi Gras; a time for party and free expression. Many guys also reckon that girls are easier during Gay Pride. I found the scene of people running around desperately trying to quell their sexual desire depressing.

With many mentally unstable people on drugs, Brighton beach can be dangerous. I remember being accosted one evening one the beach by a 'gay chav.' For non-British readers, a chav is a teenage delinquent from an underclass background. They wear sports tracksuits and 'bling', and abuse drugs and alcohol. The boys pride themselves on being macho, so the bizarre sight of a 'gay chav' is presumably unique to Brighton.

The teenage boy stumbled up to me holding a knife and told me in a camp but menacing voice he was going to fuck me. Luckily the beach was fairly crowded and fear snapped him out of his drug-induced frenzy, and he ran off.

CIVILIZATION REGAINED
In great contrast, the scene on Dalian beach is wholesome. Families play together on the beach, old men gather in groups to play chess and smoke. 50 people gather around a karaoke machine and sing old songs. In the beach promenade there is a stereo system and in the evenings middle-aged couples dress up and ballroom dance while dozens watch.

Young couples take strolls along the beach and in the evenings can buy a lighted hot air balloon and release it into the sky: their love shining over the city.

I am not writing this to glorify Chinese people, but to show how far we have been degraded. Before the Illuminati attacks on family values and morality, the scenes at Brighton beach were wholesome like those in Dalian.

While Dalian is not a particularly interesting city, with little cultural value or nightlife, I much prefer living here than in Brighton. It is a settled environment where I can focus on work and building a good future. In Brighton, with its myriad perversions and altered states, I cannot achieve emotional equilibrium.

I am young man from a lower-middle class background, so I wont be given an easy ride to a successful life. What I do in my twenties will dictate my future. You reap what you sow. If I choose to live a hedonistic and degenerate lifestyle I wont be going anywhere.

Source

UK: Why I let my son live as a girl

Livvy, who has just returned to Year 6 at school as a girl, 

stands proudly with her mother Saffron at home in Worcester

Ten-year-old Livvy James loves her new school uniform, particularly the smart, grey skirt with two pleats and pockets decorated with hearts.

‘Walking to school on my first day back, I was nervous and excited, but most of all I just felt like shouting ‘‘Yeay!’’ ’ says Livvy, who wore her shoulder-length blonde hair that day in a swishy pony-tail.

‘I was so excited that I didn’t care what people thought about me. Even if people looked at me or were saying nasty things, I didn’t care. I felt happy because I could be me and didn’t have to pretend any more.’

Pretty, softly spoken and unashamedly girlie, with a passion for pink and diamante, there is little to distinguish Livvy from the other Year 6 girls returning to primary school in Worcester. Except for one startling fact: Livvy finished the summer term of Year 5 as Sam — as in Samuel.

He walked out of the school gates in July as a boy wearing trousers, polo shirt and trainers, and returned in September, with the school’s agreement, as a girl.

That nerve-racking morning, Livvy’s anxious parents Saffron, 36, and Phillip, 34, sat in the school hall as the headteacher gave a special assembly to explain to the pupils that Sam was now Livvy and they should refer to ‘him’ as ‘her’. The headteacher explained that Livvy had a medical condition called gender dysphoria, which meant that ‘in her head she felt she was a girl and not a boy’.

She added that just as with other medical conditions, such as being disabled or having to wear glasses, on no account would any name-calling or bullying be tolerated. The response, says Livvy, was one of understanding. At least initially.

‘None of the other children called me nasty names and the boys accepted me as a girl. A few of them kept calling me by my old boy’s name, but I didn’t mind because it takes time to get used to something new. I have a small group of close friends — all girls — who would look after me if anyone tried to pick on me, so I’m not worried. I have as much acceptance as I need.’

But does she? The day we meet she is not in school, though she longs to be, but at home. She tells me she has been in hiding since her real gender became public knowledge, turning her family’s life into ‘a circus’.

Some disgruntled parents at Livvy’s school were so outraged they hadn’t been informed of the situation by letter before the assembly that they went to the local paper to vent their anger. The story quickly went global.

One parent reportedly said: ‘We are not against the child. It’s the children being asked to treat her differently and watch a transgender video without parents knowing.

‘My children came home and said: “What are genitals?” ’

A minority, however, have been far more vicious, posting online comments about Livvy’s ‘freak family’. Meanwhile, a debate rages as to whether her symptoms are a result of a medical condition or due to the way she has been brought up.

Read more...

UK: The Destruction of our Culture and Christian Values continues.

The coalition is to push ahead with plans for gay marriage following the personal intervention of David Cameron. Liberal Democrat Lynne Featherstone will today unveil plans to legislate to bring in gay marriage before 2015. The Equalities Minister will also announce that Britain should be a ‘world leader for gay rights’.

Vowing to be a personal ‘champion for gay rights’, Miss Featherstone will risk controversy by arguing that the Coalition should go even further in future. At present, gays and lesbians are allowed to enter civil partnerships, which offer most of the legal protections of marriage. But the term ‘marriage’ is not used.

Miss Featherstone will announce that a consultation will begin next March on allowing homosexuals to get married. A change in the law will follow the consultation.

Under the plans, same-sex couples will be able to have full marriages in registry offices, as heterosexual couples can. But they will still be barred from getting married in churches and other religious buildings – even though some denominations want to offer the services. Coalition sources said ministers are determined to enact the change before the next election.

Downing Street made it clear that the Prime Minister had taken a strong personal interest in the move, and had insisted that progress be speeded up. Under changes announced earlier this year, churches and other religious buildings will soon be able to host civil partnerships for the first time – although they will not be forced to do so.

The new move will be announced by Miss Featherstone, a divorced mother of two daughters, in a speech to the Lib Dem party conference in Birmingham today.

Read more...

Cameron and Sarkozy to carry on bombing Libya

Cameron and Sarkozy visited Tripoli today (15/09/2011) in a carefully staged public relations operation.

The two held a press conference with Chairman Mustapha Abdel Jalil and Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril as the two western leaders pledged to carry on bombing Libya as long as it takes. There was, of course, no mention of the recent seal of approval Mahmoud Jibril gave to the ethnic cleansing of Tawergha and no mention of the ongoing reign of terror directed against pro-Gaddafi supporters and black-skinned Libyans.

The unfortunate fact is that these leaders are not interested in finding a peaceful political accommodation between the people of Libya, but are committed to the unconditional surrender and to the brutal suppression by military force of all forces who do not share their vision of Libya’s future. This will include the taking by force of Sabha. As Chairman Jalil said:

"There will be fierce battles in Sabha with equipment that we do not yet have, and we ask for more equipment to retake these places"

As usual, the BBC faithfully relayed the messages being sent out by the British government (all the Libyan people are so grateful etc.) so we have to look to Russia Today for any kind of objective reporting of the facts on the ground:

A particularly worrying feature of Sarkozy’s recent pronouncements have been his references to Syria and the fact he obviously sees Libya as a prelude to what he wishes to achieve in that country. The preparations for an attack on Syria are already being laid (itself a prelude to attacking Iran), both in the media, by supplying arns to violent elements of the opposition and imposing economic sanctions designed to destabilise the country further.

In this context, it is fortunate that the position of Russia, reiterated by Vitaly Churkin, Russian Ambassador to the United Nations is sensibly: "If you want to protect civilians the last thing you do is start a civil war"

Source

New Videos Of Demo Explosions? In WTC 7

Degrees of Darkness in the Absence of Light.

I have been putting myself through hoops since last evening when I read this, wondering what I should say and if I should say anything. I was especially astonished by the admonitions given to the Germans about being responsible for the Palestinian troubles, however convoluted the argument. If anyone should take responsibility for The Palestinian Genocide it is Israel and this should be proclaimed by those Israelis who present themselves as friends of The Palestinians. Those who call themselves Israelis have no right to be in Palestine in the first place and they are only there through devious maneuverings and pornographic revisionism.

I’m not here to debate the extent and reality of their marketplace holocaust and I’ve no inclination to deny or question the details. What I do know is that when you make it against the law to question something then there’s something wrong with the facts because the only reason for worldwide suppression of inquiry would be that the facts wouldn’t hold water against it. To question the affair is the real province of those who present themselves as agents of truth, in seeming opposition to their countrymen. No one can be an agent of truth who does not only admit but also proclaim that Israel was behind 9/11. No one can be an agent of truth who parrots official lines and never brings certain untenable absurdities to light. Of course, this requires the courage of being capable of it.

The reason I don’t flat out deny that certain things took place is because that isn’t the important point. The important point is that the descendants of those responsible for the far larger and greater lasting holocaust in Soviet Russia, are those presently living in Israel. Given that, and accepting six million dead, one can only say that what followed was righteous karma and they are still millions of bodies short on the debt. That is the cardinal issue. Another point is that the majority of Young Turks in the Armenian holocaust were Jews. Another point is the owners of the slave ships that trafficked in human flesh, much as their present day descendents still do. Another point is that there are so many points to point out, concerning these perpetual victims that a picture begins to emerge and which is verified in their having been the only group of people on Earth to be tossed out of most of the countries in the world and sometimes more than once. An agent of truth would know these things because an agent of truth seeks the truth and should know why as well.

Read more...

EU: French bank downgrade increases pressure for austerity across Europe

The ratings firm Moody’s downgraded two of France’s biggest banks Wednesday, increasing pressure on governments across Europe to impose austerity measures on the working class.

Moody’s cut its rating for France’s second largest bank, Société Générale, from Aa2 to Aa3, and downgraded the third biggest bank, Crédit Agricole, from Aa1 to Aa2, citing their exposure to Greek government bonds. It left BNP Paribas, France’s biggest bank, at Aa2, while putting it on negative watch.

The move, which had been widely anticipated, came in the midst of mounting fears of a Greek debt default and resulting collapse in confidence in French and other European banks that have large holdings in Greek bonds.

Political leaders in Germany, France and the US intervened demonstratively on Tuesday and Wednesday to reassure financial markets that Greece was not on the verge of bankruptcy, while insisting that the social democratic PASOK government escalate its assault on the jobs and living standards of Greek workers.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Tuesday disavowed statements by her deputy chancellor and economy minister, Philipp Rösler, indicating support for an “orderly default” by Greece as an alternative to further bailout funds from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. She said she was confident that the “troika” overseeing the 110 billion-euro fund for Greece—the EU, the IMF and the European Central Bank (ECB)—would approve the next tranche of financing, 8 billion euros, which Greece says it must receive within days to avert a default on its debt payments and wage and pension obligations.

Choosing her words deliberately, she did not in principle rule out letting Greece go bankrupt. “It is our top priority to avoid an uncontrolled default,” Merkel said.

On Wednesday, she held a teleconference with French President Nikolas Sarkozy and Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou after which all three issued statements reaffirming their common commitment to aiding Greece and keeping it in the euro zone—contingent on Greece meeting strict deficit- and debt-reduction targets that have already plunged the country into a depression.

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner also sought to reassure the financial markets. In a speech at a New York conference co-hosted by the cable financial channel CNBC and Institutional Investor magazine, and in subsequent interviews, he declared his confidence that the European powers would take whatever measures were needed to avoid a Greek default and contain the sovereign debt crisis that is threatening to undermine the euro currency and the banks.

Geithner made clear, however, that the US considers the steps taken by Europe thus far to be inadequate. He called on European governments to use “overwhelming force” to deal with the continent’s financial crisis and added, “They have to move more quickly.”

Indicating the extreme concern in Washington over the deteriorating financial situation in Europe, Geithner is taking the unprecedented step of attending a meeting Friday of the European Union’s Economic and Financial Affairs Council (Ecofin), which is being held in Wroclaw, Poland.

The main purpose of Wednesday’s three-way teleconference was evidently to lay down the law to Greece and extract a pledge of further layoffs and budget cuts. Over the weekend, after negotiators for the EU, IMF and ECB had broken off talks on the next installment of bailout funds because Greece was 2 billion euros over its deficit target, Papandreou announced a 2 billion-euro hike in property taxes. However, the financial markets brushed the move aside and escalated their speculative betting that Greece would default.

Read more...

UK: The Government finally admits its reason for opposing an EU referendum: it would lose

A constituent gets in touch following last week's blog about how opponents of an In/Out referendum never admit their real motive. He had written to the Prime Minister to ask for such a vote, and received a reply from an FCO official called Cathy Kerry. It began as follows:

Thank you for your letter to the Prime Minister about concerns you have regarding the European Union. I apologise for the delay in our response. Where relevant, letters are delegated to officials for a response. Therefore your letter has been forwarded to the Europe Directorate of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for a reply.

Like you, many British people feel disconnected with how the EU has developed and about the decisions that have been taken in their name. The Government believes that membership of the EU is in the national interest of the UK. We champion vigorously the interests of the UK and play an active role within the EU. We also believe that the EU needs to change and can improve, and we are confident in the UK's ability to move the EU in the right direction. For this reason, there will not be a referendum on this issue.

Well, ten out of ten for honesty. We're against a referendum because we'd, you know, lose it. The FCO functionary artlessly admits what elected ministers dare not: Britain would vote to leave the EU.

Never mind the twisted logic ("many British people feel disconnected with how the EU has developed and about the decisions that have been taken in their name," so "for this reason, there will not be a referendum on this issue"). The most striking aspect of the letter is what it tells us about the location of power.

You possibly have to have been in politics to understand the extent to which David Cameron works for Cathy Kerry rather than the other way around. Alright, not for her personally, but for the mandarinate she represents. When she writes in the name of "the Government", she doesn't mean a few dozen transient ministers; she means the state machine.

Read more...

UK: Motorists are paying over the odds for fuel

Hard-pressed motorists have seen little or no benefit from the recent fall in crude oil prices, the AA has revealed.

A 7 per cent drop in the value of the pound against the dollar since August has denied drivers the possibility of a 2p per litre price cut on petrol, the motoring organisation said. Prices dipped around 1.5p in August but have climbed again to leave prices of both petrol and diesel within a fraction of their all-time high seen in May, even though the market prices of crude oil have fallen by more than 10 per cent.

The cost of a litre of petrol is now 135.61p while a litre of diesel is 139.62p, meaning there has been none of the usual downward move following the end of the summer driving season, said the AA.

President Edmund King added that the price of Brent crude was also 10 US dollars a barrel out of line with the US equivalent of light crude, something that was potentially worth 5p a litre to UK motorists, he said.

'Current fuel prices would be worse were it not for UK supermarkets' traditional lag in passing on higher wholesale costs.'

Read more...